Cyber: The Immortal King

From the current point of view, there are relatively few cyberpunk elements, mainly the description of the training sequence From a purely plot point of view, it is still very good. The multiple personality disorder at the beginning is very thoughtful, which reminds me of a movie recommended to us by a university psychology teacher. There are already many books in this area (such as companies, enterprises, consortiums), I hope the author can write his own style Finally, hurry up, the new year is over, it is time to go to work, the author is great!

So the male protagonist traveled through time and space through the original protagonist's main personality (the leader), and the other idols, including Pig Killer Thor and others, are all sub-personalities (members)?

How should I put it... It seems interesting, but a bit hard. I said feeling. The foreshadowing is interspersed with text, and a sudden hammer knocks the villain to death. We know it is inevitable, and everyone can guess the reason. There is no harshness in the excessiveness. What if: a bland narrative, blandly knocking the villain to death with a hammer... When I first read the novel The Debtor, the writing was about calmly knocking the villain to death on the road. It feels very different

There are not many cyber elements, but the story is good and you can watch it.

It's well written, with distinct characters and their own characteristics.

Did I read it wrong? I ranked fifth in 7 hours of reading? Is the author so miserable? This is a strong recommendation.

The writing is good. This uncle is a good uncle. Don't define the character first when you see it. It will be reversed later. It's very lovable, including the character of the uncle.

I wonder if any readers of this book really want to read Cyberpunk?

What route should we take? Better write something cyberpunk