Siheyuan: Those Things in That Year and Month

Zhi Da Cai Shu 😒 After reading the following content, I found that the ability is just that, better than no brain, but not as satisfying.

The author Qin uses the protagonist as a raft to collect money from relatives, and backhands the blame to the protagonist. The protagonist still ignores the plot after knowing it. It is too poisonous. It is okay to establish the Jia family as a villain, but he cannot give the protagonist an intelligence to highlight the villain. Martyrs increase the courtyard brother and increase the elder's character design. He actually let two semi-literate widows do all kinds of calculations. They knew they were cheated and didn't react at all. I don't want the protagonist to be a honeycomb, but he can't be too stupid.

The title of this book should be (Prequel to Siheyuan: I am laughing at other people's lives from the side) 🙂

How to put it, let's just imagine, look at those years from today's perspective. Isn't it necessary to find faults? People are stupid enough to lick Qin Huairu willingly. Can they be persuaded to come back with a few words of red lips and white teeth? There was also the matter of job introduction, which made me a bit wise and tell the truth. Someone once discussed with me how we must have a good relationship with our close neighbors at that time. I think you should take good care of yourself first, and then be kind. Help when you can, and help those who deserve it, instead of being unjust and unappreciative. In short, you must take good care of yourself first. No one will respect you if you abuse good people.

Because there have already been TV series, readers of Siheyuan Wen are basically familiar with Zhongqin. Siheyuan Zhongqin has only one theme: calculation. What readers want to see is the wisdom and strength displayed by the protagonist when faced with the calculations of the birds again and again. However, this article uses the perspective of the protagonist to whitewash all the animals and also fantasizes about influencing them. Isn't this a saintly bitch?

What can I say about this book? It feels like you are an outsider looking at the past from an outsider's perspective, so you feel out of place. It feels like this when I read it too

Is this stuff written on the Internet? I thought it was documentary literature!

It's a bit messy. I don't know what it means. It doesn't have a grand program. It's very messy and has no sense of substitution. The ratio of authors is really bad.