Prince of the Han Dynasty

Speed ​​up the update😍

I personally think this is correct, but many people who have unique insights into history are very opposed to it. Next, I will use a question-and-answer method to prove the correctness of my affirmation of Qin Shihuang's achievements 1. Question: Punishing Qin was the zzzq of the late Qin Dynasty. Isn't it against heaven for the protagonist to rectify Qin Shihuang's name? Answer: zzzq is your personal imagination. At the end of the Qin Dynasty, there were some who used the banner of punishing the Qin Dynasty, some who used the banner of "Fu Su" (the original Chen Sheng and Wu Guang), and some who were loyal to Zhengtong II (Zhang Han). Among those who punished the Qin Dynasty, there were those who restored the six kingdoms (Xiang Yu) and started a new dynasty (Liu Bang). After you sing these banners, we will appear. , There have been many changes, and there has never been a universally recognized correctness. The so-called correctness only depends on who has the biggest fist. In the final analysis, this period is originally a chaotic and creative era. If you have the ability, you can open a XX family, let alone rectify the name of the deceased, and the protagonist is in the second largest fist at the time. 2. Question: Qin Shihuang is stupid and unprincipled. To rectify Qin Shihuang's name is to annihilate himself and the people. Answer: It is still Chen Sheng and Wu Guang. If the whole world really wishes for the demise of the Qin Dynasty, then why do they still use the banner of Fusu and so many people respond? In fact, the real violence against the Qin was directed at the second generation, just like those who rebelled against the Qing Dynasty and restored the Ming Dynasty must be the current emperor rather than the Taizu of the Qing Dynasty, and those who rebelled against the Qing Dynasty must be Nanming or anyone else rather than Zhu Yuanzhang. 3. Question: What is the use of rectifying the name of Qin Shihuang? It's really useful. Why didn't Liu Bang use it in history? Answer: Good question, why don't you ask Liu Bang why he didn't open subjects to obtain scholars and open three provinces and six departments in history? Are these useless? Judge whether it is useful based on whether Liu Bang has used it. . . You are truly a heavyweight. 4. Correcting the name of Qin Shihuang will make future generations respect Qin and demote Han, which will allow Qin Shihuang to take advantage. Answer: If rectifying a person's name can affect future generations' understanding of the Han Dynasty, then it can only be said that he deserves to be demoted, but is it possible? So what affects future generations is all your own imagination. Only mice with low self-esteem will think that if another person is strong, it means that the public will devalue themselves As for saying that Liu Bang could have won, on this basis, to rectify Qin Shihuang's name is Qin Shihuang taking advantage, a good idea, judging from the latest plot of the novel, Shang Shan There is no need for Si Hao to come. Liu Bang could have won anyway, so they are taking advantage, and all the talents who appear later who are discovered in advance or persuaded to surrender are also taking advantage. If you think like this, what novels are you reading? Read more history books, no one takes advantage in the history books 5 Qin Shihuang is a fool, what is his name? Answer:. . . . I refuse to answer this most important one After seeing the Humanoid Awards for several months, let me add one more sentence. Those junior users who have been for thousands of days or private junior users do not need to reply to me. You are all right.

Liu Bang. . . It's a big story, don't write it as a gangster or something like that. How did he treat the Xiang family after his death, how did he bury Xiang Yu, how did he treat the heroes, don't look at the marketing account, look at the historical facts.

Some people really only know about the First Emperor of Qin but not about the remaining heroes of the Sixth Generation. They only know about the unification of the Qin State and don't know about Duke Zhou's intention to establish the Zhou rites and establish China. They only know about the First Emperor of Qin who swept through the six kingdoms but don't know about the painstaking efforts of the six generations of Mingjuns in the Han Dynasty.

I remember that Liu Bang would have deposed the crown prince without the help of my mother, Lu Fei, and Zhang Liang's advice.

This record of Liu Bang kicking the child out of the car is outrageous, let alone escaping without riding a horse or taking a carriage. Then Xia Houying either has a world or a platinum star. He picked up children several times and the pursuers couldn't catch up 😅

Don't hold back, why did the author start to engage in pseudo-historical theory? People's Republic of China doesn't want these dinners.

I'm making a pseudo-history, I can't stand it anymore, I'm going to delete the book, I'm sorry. Before deleting the book, I would like to give the author a friendly reminder that I am slightly interested in coin collection. A large number of Seleucid silver coins have been unearthed in India, as well as other cultural relics. The currency type of Greece directly influenced Hellenistic countries such as Rome and Macedonia, including Bactria, Indo-Greece, Indo-Stage, Parthia, etc. I don't know much about other cultural relics of ancient Greece and Rome. I only know a little bit about coins. Their size is quite large, which is enough to prove the size of civilization; the distribution of coins is also very wide. Teacher Wang Yang from the School of History of Nankai University also wrote about this aspect in "Research on Apollo-Type Coins of the Seleucid Dynasty". From 1978 to 1979, the Soviet Union also discovered a large number of ancient Seleucid artifacts in Afghanistan. I remember that there were also a large number of coins.

I hate Confucianism the most. It has a lot of great principles and no policies to strengthen the country. Except for the comparison between stupid people and Legalism.

In my personal opinion, I was the one who blew the poison of Qin when Chu and Han were fighting. First of all, the source of Liu Bang's legitimacy as King of Han comes from conquering the unjust, punishing the Qin Dynasty, and defeating the Qin Dynasty, which is the denial of his own political power. The author seems to have gone to school and has not studied Hongmen Banquet and Chen She Family. Secondly, Liu Bang took over Guanzhong and used three chapters to make it clear that the inheritance of Qin law was not conducive to the stability of Guanzhong. The author thought that people were thinking about Qin.

Lu Ze can be called one of the Ten Philosophers of the New Generation Internet Temple. He is also an original stock and the number one hero. He boasts endlessly. The Lu family was forced by their enemies to flee with their entire family. Liu Bang boasted that he would gladly go out to welcome him in person if he paid 10,000 yuan in congratulations. When Lu Pheasant married into the Liu family, she had to take her children to work in the fields. It's really funny that such a poor man who seeks refuge by giving his young daughter to a forty-year-old local gangster can be turned into a virgin by half-hearted people.

Don't forget the well digger when drinking water! Bao Qin indeed deserves to die, but you can't deny his achievements. Without Bao Qin, the early Han Dynasty would not have been so weak, but right, without Bao Qin there would still be the Han Dynasty? Anyone with some brains can figure it out! History has been settled. The Qin Dynasty rebelled and died. As a result, the early Han Dynasty was very weak. However, because of Qin's writing, the unification of weights and measures, etc., The early Han Dynasty could develop with peace of mind. This logical closed loop is indispensable. Just like a great man, the things he did are much more awesome than those of Emperor Qin and Han Wu! But without these 5,000 years of cultural foundation, how could he succeed? Nothing can happen independently of cause and effect.

Qin Chui is the most annoying! Especially those who brag about Qin Shihuang! To be honest, if Qin Shihuang hadn't been the ancestral dragon, there would be nothing to brag about! What was the biggest reason for the demise of the Qin Dynasty? ! It was Qin Shihuang who ruined the farming and war system by not keeping his word! Then it swelled up again and started enjoying it, and it was effective! The whole country is in a state of chaos! Then, like Yang Guang, he was too anxious. He wanted to finish something that took decades to finish in one day! How to say that Qin's laws are harsh and the second generation is incompetent! They all took the blame for Qin Shihuang. The laws of the Han Dynasty and the Qin Dynasty were similar! Why doesn't anyone say harsh? ! Qin II has always used the system of the First Emperor! Qin II was also the type of emperor who ruled from the top down and was favored by scholar-bureaucrats! If Qin Shihuang disappeared two or three years after unification, there would really be nothing left for the Han Dynasty! The only thing that Qin Shihuang did after the reunification was beneficial to the country was to patrol the east, because this shocked the nobles of the six countries. Although it was a bit expensive, it could reduce military expenditures! Do you know what great unification is? It is not the unification of land, the so-called great unification is the unification of civilization inheritance! The Qin Dynasty only unified the land! The real great unification was from Emperor Gaozu of the Han Dynasty to Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty! What Qin Chui said about the system of prefectures and counties and the centralization of power was not the first thing Qin did. It existed in the Spring and Autumn Period, but it was not implemented yet! Different systems are suitable for a period of time. After the Qin State unified the land, the system of counties and counties was actually not the best system. On the contrary, the best system was the enfeoffment of both reality and reality, so as to satisfy external demand and domestic demand!

After the male protagonist's operation, he will succeed to the throne in the future, and he will be as stable as Mount Tai 😏, and he can compete with Zhu Biao 😏

🙂 This book review section is weird. Everyone here crazily advocates the feudal empire, but when the identity card is turned over, it turns out to be a citizen.

Great men hate every feudal dynasty equally, and those who spread rumors are all bad-mouthed

Do you really think that being chased by the Chu army will reduce the weight of the car? Which camp did you arrive at first after running away? Why was Liu Ying established as the prince not long after arriving at the camp? As an emperor who can be praised by teachers, his level is much better than some people who only know Liu Bang and are a gangster leader.

I don't understand why we should approve of Qin Shihuang's achievements. From the perspective of our descendants, Qin Shihuang was great, but the question is, was this at the end of Qin? Moreover, the people of Qin have suffered from Qin for a long time, and the system of Qin has exploited the people of Qin to the extreme. And the protagonist of The End of Qin is the remnants of the Six Kingdoms. If Liu Bang can defeat Xiang Yu, doesn't it mean that Xiang Yu is unpopular? The protagonist has nothing to say after doing this, he has already gone to occupy Xiang Yu's team.

Shuzi quick update

I couldn't stand it after reading the first chapter, and it wasn't because of the author. A little disconnected 1. The high-speed carriage kicked 5, and the 6-year-old child got off 3 times. The people of the old Liu family are in really good health. Did Sima Qian think that all people are supermen because the castration didn't hurt? 2. Liu Bang's kick may be understood as going crazy, and people lose their minds in a hurry. What happened three times? He stopped to pick him up and continued to kick him. Moreover, the weight of a 5- or 6-year-old child affects the speed of the car. If you want to go faster, you can just ride a horse and run. 3. Liu Ying is the common denominator of Liu Bang and Lu's heroes. Killing him will cause internal instability. Liu Bang has tolerated Han Xin, so he can't tolerate his own son. It can only be said that Tai Shigong forged it, and since Liu Ying had no descendants, no one would correct this.

The remnants of Fen VI were defeated 14 years after unifying the world. The ancient transportation level began to turn against the world in 10 months. Can the Abalone Emperor Lu Zheng also take the blame? Guangshen next door was so promiscuous, but it didn't fall so quickly. Wang Mang usurped the Han government and existed for more than this little time. How strong was the so-called unification of the Qin Dynasty, and how weak was its ruling power? This can be seen from the word "Da Suo" that often appears in Qin Shihuang's Chronicles. What is even more abstract is that the remnants of the Six Kingdoms have mushroomed, and the ruling classes in various places have taken the lead in funding. They even danced in the so-called counties of the Qin State without anyone arresting them. What was Lu Zheng doing in his later years? What is the purpose of your eastward tour? What is the significance of this behavior? It is nothing more than enhancing dominance. During his rule, he abused people's power and built wonders. He also liked to take drugs, and his filial sons and virtuous grandchildren also liked to steal the credit of the Western Zhou and Han Dynasties. It was really troublesome. The most important thing is that he also likes to unify words, unify weights and measures, and make cars track the same track. I don't know which ancient people in the parallel universe can do this to rule time.

Among the founding emperors, Liu Bang was not very popular.

The only person in the historical area who talks about false history of the West dug up the ancestral graves of fake foreign devils... The foreign devils were not in a hurry, they were blown up by these anxious kings.

I feel like following the Emperor Gaozu of the Han Dynasty

All historical texts are extremists. I mean readers. For example, if you like the Han Dynasty, the Qin Dynasty was useless. It was cruel and cruel to the people. Anyway, you are thirsty. If you like the Qin Dynasty, you should read the Han Dynasty. What you say is completely useless. The Qin Dynasty is simply a fairyland on earth. People go to heaven. All the nearly 400 years of education are attributed to Qin Shihuang alone. Not to mention the remaining bright fans, all of them are so stunned.

I don't know much about history, so I can't say much about this. But the plot is still okay, and the father and son have indeed written something. As for some people who say they are boasting about Confucianism or Qin Dynasty, I can't say anything about it, because I only understand history from textbooks, and other historical novels and things about the Ming Dynasty, so as long as it is not a brainless boast, I can't actually feel anything. Anyway, history novices seem to be quite good, and there are no poisonous points for the time being. As for those who understand history, it depends on themselves.

Since the establishment of the Han Dynasty, the atmosphere in this book has fallen into a "you are good, I am good, everyone is good" situation, and it feels like playing house.

Congratulations to the first alliance of "The Prince of the Han Dynasty" Personal band I am full of praise and applause, otherwise this reward is not enough to express my gratitude! Personal band rewards 100,000 points. This book is so well written, I will give it as a reward and hope that the follow-up will be more exciting! Thank you for your support ヾ(✿ﾟ▽ﾟ)ノ

Advantages                                                                                                Qin is the first unified dynasty in China. 3. Qin unified currency economically, and unified weights and measures (weights and measures are a general term for objects that calculate the length, weight, and volume of objects, such as rulers, scales) 4. Qin built a road for travel and implemented "cars on the same track" Finally, the above is the content of the ninth lesson of the seventh-grade history book of the People's Education Press. Don't go wrong, the bar means you are right.

Western history has been exaggerated, but there is no trace at all. Isn't it too decisive?