Silla

I thought it was Bangzi Silla. . . . Should Sicily unify Italy or conquer the Ottomans eastward?

Should we unite Italy first and then unite Spain, or should we unite Spain first and then unite Italy? Also, will the ending be Napoleon's Franco-Spanish-Italian alliance, or will Italy alone dominate the Mediterranean, or will it really unite the Mediterranean and revive Rome?

It is very important to catch up on the new book. Please read it every day. Thank you.

First of all, it's the failure of technology. In this era, you dare to use breech-loading gun technology. How do you solve the problem of air tightness? Apart from this, I won't say much about the other big technology tricks introduced by the author. In addition, I would like to ask the author how you plan to solve the problem of no large coal mines and iron ores. To make a steam engine, you need to burn coal, and to make a steam engine, you need to make steel. You don't expect to transport these from the Great Lakes area, do you? The costs are going to skyrocket. One of the most important production principles in the pre-industrial era was the principle of proximity of raw materials, because transportation costs were too high. It was no accident that Britain became the birthplace of the Industrial Revolution. It was inevitable due to a variety of factors. Even if the travelers could accelerate their development to a certain extent, the disadvantages of the Two Sicilies would not be changed. Also, there is obviously a big problem with the protagonist's diplomacy now: Faced with the overwhelming power of the Shenluo Mountain, we cannot be too stalemate with it, otherwise there will be a problem that I can't defeat France, and I can't defeat you; To maintain the Bourbon Alliance and ensure the expansion of North Africa, then we must alliance with Tsarist Russia on the issue of European hegemony; If we want to revive the Mediterranean trade network, we must first dismember the Ottoman Empire to prevent it from fully encircling Europe again after its revival. Finally, we must cut off the connection between the Ottoman Empire and North Africa (that is, rebuild the Crusader countries). However, this will destroy the Sacrifice Alliance and give Tsarist Russia an opportunity to go south to the Balkans. Tsarist Russia and the Ottomans can only choose one of the two, Bourbon and the HRE can only choose one of the two, the Ottoman trade profits and the raw materials of the American colonies can only be chosen one of the two. In this case, the optimal solution is to unite Tsarist Russia, the HRE and the British, abandon the American colonies and pursue the expansion of North Africa. However, if the protagonist wants to unify Italy and then take over Spain, it is a dream. Unless the author is smart and clever, the protagonist will definitely be doomed if the British troublemaker is around.

I am also Siamese 😡😡😡😡

If Spain loses the war like this, it will probably lose face. You are talking about the Spanish royal family, How many kings have the royal family changed in each term? Have you changed it? Changing the soup does not change the medicine. Carlos III also has a reason to say, What kind of team did I (once) lead? I led the Two Sicilies team. Who are these people of yours? You asked me to lead them? What is the current level of Spain? With just a few people, It has been unable to beat Portugal. Can he beat it? I can't fight. You don't have the ability, you know? If we continue (if we continue) we will lose to Sardin. After Portugal lost to Sardinia, and then to the Holy See, no one lost next.

Bottled water is cheaper than you 🙂

Let me go. I thought it was Silla on the Korean Peninsula. I was also thinking about how outrageous the competition claimed by Rome was. Even "Luo" could compete for it. I wouldn't be surprised when Aisin Gioro would conquer the West and regain the Roman Empire 😎

Chapter 14: Your reason for choosing the Sicilian throne is a bit vicious.

Are you writing a book about Silla? It's really novel (dog head)