If You Were Asked to File a Lawsuit, How Come You Were Not Found Guilty?

It's really beautiful, come on author

I found that the biggest advantage of the protagonist in this book is that he will definitely meet a judge who will judge impartially (laughs)

The yamen door opens to the south. If you have no money, don't come in. There are rights, but no laws. The lawyer was kicked out by the court, why are you still being awesome? ? ? Every time you meet a fair and just judge, the court. This is the protagonist's biggest golden finger.

The book is a good book, but why should I discover it so early😭

It is very compact and very eye-catching. It completes one section in 30 chapters without any delay. As long as there is no water later and no loss of quality, the future will be bright.

The legal education was very good, the law was very professional, and the story was good, but I still gave it up. The main thing was the live broadcast of the court hearing. The audience interaction was too intellectual and a bit disgusting.

When I say, "You didn't hit me, why should you help me?" And "Can't I protect my rights if they are not infringed?" How should you respond?

I think the emergency evacuation is a bit far-fetched. The driver's son has a fever and has been ill for several years. He has also been issued a critical illness notice, so the child's fever may have serious consequences. So, have there been cases where children have to be sent to the hospital in emergencies? If so, why do they drink a lot of alcohol without considering that the child may have an emergency? Using such a far-fetched emergency evacuation, the driver's imprisonment will of course affect his life and family, but this is not a reason not to bear the consequences of breaking the law. Of course, you must bear the consequences of breaking the law

The latest crime of dangerous driving can be defended by subjective lack of intention and the legal right to life.

After reading the whole book for a long time, the protagonist is the only one who understands the law.

When I saw the introduction, I felt that it was perfunctory. In the surname, the second tone is pronounced "Ren", which is not the same as seriousness. As a writer, you should not make such a stupid mistake.

It's really too watery. There are too many scenes of the audience outside the venue. 40,000 Words out of the 100,000 words are written about what the audience is doing outside the venue. Who would dare to order such a book after it is put on the shelves? I have written 45 chapters on the first case. If you write two chapters a day, I will have to pursue it for 13 days. How can I still be interested in pursuing it? I hope the author will consider it more from the readers' perspective!

Nowadays, the cases that are reversed are basically due to procedural or evidence flaws. Everyone has a hard balance in their minds as to whether they are really guilty or not. In these cases that are being hyped on the Internet, everyone is unjustly accused.

Litigation is just a joke, right?

That's it for the shelves, what do I think about it? Save a hundred chapters first 🤓

Although it successfully captured my emotions and eyeballs, being short and sharp is never as good as being sharp and long. Even the donkeys in the production team dare not rest like this.

The book is very good, the two cases are both classic, and the identification of legitimate defense and emergency evacuation of marital rape are very interesting. The disadvantage is that the barrage during the trial is so annoying that I skipped it.

Before reading this, I want to ask, does this book require me to keep in mind? ! I won't read it if I need to. I don't have much brain power to begin with, so I can't lose it anymore!

Do you trust the judge? Or a lawyer? Ha ha

It's too watery. Let's not talk about the Kunshan Long Ge case. How long ago was the cesspit case? Why are you always using old cases? The most important thing is to always take advantage of hot cases. Where are your own things? The audience for this kind of article will probably be exposed to hot legal news or Luo Xiang's videos.

The author should note that he should write less about criminal cases and more about civil and economic cases. I'm afraid that if you write more about criminal matters, this book will be published. In reality, many criminal lawyers have gone out to pick up sewing machines. I heard it all from Teacher Luo. Ha ha.

Why do I feel that the author has the illusion that he is not like a human being when studying law, but he knows that he is really not a human being and can only write novels that will hit the street, so he writes the plot against his own heart?

I finished reading Chapter 204 in one afternoon. The author will update soon.

I used the opportunity to promote my book "Let You Save a Bankrupt Factory and You Become the Richest Man in the World" Time travel to 2004, Gao Huaijun took over a factory that was about to go bankrupt. Hold the technology of the future. In this era of great changes where East and West collide head-on. He will start from the electronics manufacturing industry and set foot in electronics, chips, automobiles, finance, energy, artificial intelligence and other related fields. He brought future technologies into this era one after another, single-handedly driving the world's technological progress. These technologies will eventually become the spark that ignites the direction of civilization.

Generally speaking, it is very good. Those who say that all judges are fair are the biggest bugs. It is better to say that reality is the biggest bug. Going back to the book, can we give all the intellectual problems to ordinary people like the audience or the defendant, instead of letting the prosecutors and judges be the clowns. Let the duel between prosecutors and lawyers return to professionalism. For example, in the latest sister-in-law case, the lawyer failed to show his talent halfway through the trial, and the prosecutor was too stupid to know. Just like the God of Gamblers, the highest point is not when he flipped the card, but when his opponent guessed that he would flip the card.

What should the protagonist do when he encounters a judge who asks, "Why can't I bear it anymore?"

I'm convinced, I want to ask you, this place is broken, how much do you want to add to the next chapter?

I saw a similar book before, with 200 chapters written. The editor said that China is a society ruled by law and cannot be written like this. It must have positive energy.

Is this the end

Damn it, are you messing up?