Peach Blossom Edict

First of all I have no problem with the author's book. I have voted for monthly votes and given rewards. The writing is good, the emotions are delicate, and the conflict of views between men and women is accurately and penetratingly written. The book itself describes such an ordinary family, but a brave and kind-hearted woman who is independent, has opinions and is self-persistent. After rescuing someone, if you have a disagreement with the male protagonist, you can self-examine whether what you have done is insufficient, or you can understand each other and reach reconciliation with the male protagonist. I have no problem with the male protagonist at all. The male protagonist has a good family background and personality, and it's normal for his perspectives to be different. But it's such a pity that in the end, the heroine came to the introspection conclusion about herself "just because she was not satisfied in her heart" through the words of others, which really made people choke. Do we have to label women as being dominated by emotions? It is an ancient story, but the author is a modern person, and the heroine who has described such a good character still cannot get rid of this ideological shackles. In the eyes of some people in the comment area, the heroine's kindness and wisdom are just a joke. Just because she is a heroine and a heroine from an ordinary family, she is not qualified or worthy of saving people. Women are angry because of the so-called "being". Women must be perfect in every detail to be worthy of being a heroine. Everyone has to think carefully for five hundred years before coming to rescue when they act bravely or when the road is rough. Isn't the incident at Tangshan Barbecue Restaurant still fresh in our minds? Instead, one or two women came up to help. All the men stood aside and asked, but they still had to consider their families and children. Don't women have families and children? Don't blame your cowardice and indifference on your family members. Keanu Reeves said in an interview, "I don't want to live in a world where kindness is regarded as a weakness." As long as a person cares about others a little more, he will be ridiculed as a "Mother". Was the Virgin originally a derogatory term? It was because some commentators first sarcastically criticized the heroine and said that the heroine was sick that I made an angry comment. Of course, especially judging from the current situation, the character of the rescued woman is not very good. The author may also later write that the heroine is thankless or cheated. Then some people will probably be able to say, look, the heroine is so stupid and overestimates her capabilities. Also, I would like to apologize to the author. The comments caused by the anger caused by the kind of person who would personally attack me are my own downgrades. I believe that the author who can write such an article has his own beauty and calculations in mind. Wish you a great sale.

I don't understand, a slave who has a bond of prostitution, who did such a deceiving thing to his master, is treated like a wolf in front of him and a tiger in the back!

The writing is good and the storyline is reasonable and compact.

There are only recommendation votes, and they all voted.

Only a favored daughter will feel confident talking back to her father 😁😁

I hate this kind of heroine. Maybe it's because I live in reality and can't escape from it.

I would like to ask if this book is Shuang Jie? Or is it 1v1? I'm worried that there will be a concubine or something behind me.