You’re a Lawyer, and You Sent the Judge to Prison?

It sounds like a fairy tale, but real lawsuits seem to have the opposite result.

It is still recommended that the author first educates himself and has more professional reserves to write professional articles... Understanding the case emotionally will create poisonous points or trivial matters, which will worsen the public opinion environment. There are already too many emotional public opinion trials in the online world, and those are trampling on the rule of law!

#New book trial##Chui Ding# A lawyer with a winning rate of 99% travels through a parallel world and takes on difficult-to-win cases. His average performance will send the opponent in, his good performance will send the opponent's lawyer in, and his extraordinary performance will send in the hammer-beater! The cases selected in this book are exciting, the court debates are fierce, and it is both professional and readable! Title of Book: When you become a lawyer, do you send the judge in? Author: Dafengwu Type: city, urban life Tags: lawyer, court trial, professional, relaxed Number of words: 68,000 words, serialized Evaluation: Seedling, great masterpiece, promising to book thousands of orders! Overview of the work: The protagonist, as a lawyer with a high winning rate, travels through parallel worlds, acquires systems, takes on bizarre cases, debates in court, and wins all the way! Brief comments on highlights: ①The cases selected in this book are wonderful. (1) First of all, the brilliance of the case lies in the difficulty of the case. Whether it is a bank robbery case or a divorce fraud case, it is not something that ordinary lawyers can solve, which gives the protagonist room to play. (2) Secondly, the brilliance of the case lies in its multi-faceted nature. Looking at the case from different angles, the results obtained are different. The results obtained by fully complying with procedural justice do not meet everyone's simple moral expectations. So how does the protagonist satisfy both the requirements of procedural justice and substantive justice within the framework of procedure? The protagonist of this work cuts in from other angles, or cites other legal provisions to counter-claim the other party, or increases the burden of proof on the other party in accordance with the principle of whoever proposes the proof, which increases the tension and professionalism of the story. ②The protagonist of this book has a wonderful image. The image of the protagonist satisfies the public's moral expectations for a good lawyer. He takes over the case and can win the case, and he does not help the strong party to exploit the weak party. Because the life of the law lies in experience rather than logic, every time the protagonist defends and wins the case in court, everyone in the book and book friends will feel sincerely happy for the protagonist and the client. But part of the legal experience lies in the discretion of the judge, which can exercise a certain degree of discretion within the scope of the framework. Therefore, I don't know if the title of the book "Send the Judge In" is an exaggeration or the real plot behind it... ③ It does not completely follow the description of the cutscene in reality. (1) The author's summary is appropriate. In reality, if you accept a case, you need to make a lot of preparations in the early stage, collect evidence, communicate with the client, communicate with witnesses, submit evidence, verify the other party's evidence, etc. The book focuses on the protagonist's verbal battle with Lotus during the court trial, and other non-key content is omitted. (2) In reality, the civil law system is statutory law, and legal provisions must be strictly followed, and experience is reflected in the interpretation of the provisions when making judgments. The maritime law system is case law, focusing on past cases. However, in this book, when the protagonist came up with clauses to defend the case in court, he cited previous precedents. This slightly dramatic description will not weaken the professionalism and rationality of the book, but will only increase the sense of expectation among book lovers, looking forward to how the protagonist will turn the tables. Summary: In short, this book is a professional article for young lawyers, with exciting cases, a clear and pleasing protagonist, and a full sense of anticipation! I don't think the author is a newbie. I don't know if it is an old author or the work of a great outsider. A lawyer with a perfect winning rate, looking forward to sending the gavel in! Recommended for book friends who like lawyer professional articles.

Can this book be on the new book list? The system of second instance and final adjudication becomes the second instance and then the final adjudication. Is dissatisfaction with the judgment an administrative review? The author may have watched some TV dramas, but he lacks basic legal knowledge. Please don't write this kind of article that involves relatively professional knowledge. It's uncomfortable to watch.

Sigh... After reading this novel, I thought the case was really the follow-up written in the novel. It wasn't until I browsed one of the cases in this novel on Station B... That I discovered that the follow-up was the opposite of what was in the novel. It made me furious and suddenly felt a little powerless. The follow-up we pursued can only be realized in the novel. It's really a bit sad.

It's so fake. The reality is that not only can't the case be won, but someone is also going to get retaliated against by someone else.

After reading seventeen chapters, it was a great read. The writing was very poor. The first case had huge loopholes. How could it be so easy to rob a bank and overturn the case? It was great, but the writing was ridiculously poor. I could still say these two words in court testimony and forget about it. The oral narration of the weight was not in kilograms, but in kilograms? How many kilograms does a person weigh? What about selling goods? How can a normal person describe his body weight in kilograms? It was very enjoyable to read it. It is a good and refreshing article, but the writing is too poor.

Is there something wrong with the author's worldview and outlook on life, or is it because he has received similar injuries and has some prejudices? It was fine in the early stage, but in the later stage, there were no good people in the grassroots police, prosecutors and law, and it just didn't feel right.

I saw this in the group today and thought the author could use it as material 😁

Su Bai