American Comics: Starting from the Spider-Man Parallel Universe

On the surface, he is Spider-Man, but in fact he is a refined egoist. When he sees evil things, he usually does not care about them and does not change the plot. If others want to care about them, he will erase his memory... The legendary Spider-Man Yi Xiaochuan?

So these Spider-Man can only be restrained by spider silk, and their tens of tons of power are just a decoration? ? ? ? ? In the end, there are no less enemies, so everything is fine. Is it a comedy?

This is the original version.

After knowing the plot, there is no change, so I just follow the plot. The writing style does not show the caution of the protagonist. Instead, it reflects that the author has not thought about how to write it at all, and just plans to write the original plot and insert the protagonist as a dispensable person later.

Why is the protagonist written as such a villain? Some people like righteous heroes, and some people like cunning villains, but few like a wretched villain. There is something wrong with the protagonist's personality.

The protagonist has no role No changes have been made It can follow the plot But this is copied from the plot The protagonist has no magic and cannot see any role

. . There is no Spider-Man flavor at all. The plot of the parallel universe is just as planned. Even if the final ending is known, the protagonist still shows no courage to move forward and overcome obstacles.

So I came to read the original work? It feels like most of them are retellings and explanations

What's the point of following the plot? If you don't gain any benefits and don't strengthen yourself, watching movies is more interesting for me than you are!

Can the author stop making mixed worldviews? Those who are not good enough can't grasp it. Not to mention HP and Marvel, many old authors of X-Men and Marvel cannot grasp it. It's better to go all the way and continue to be a participating audience through the plot. At least it won't collapse, right? I'm quite confused about whether to change the plot or not. The timeline of many books has been changed so long ago that the plot is completely changed. As a result, major events that I want to see either don't happen at all or the combat power collapses. I haven't read Captain Marvel and it is covered in this book. The author's writing is quite clear.

I prefer Penny Parker to Gwen

The character of the protagonist is not good at this stage. He wants to follow the original plot line too much. He even wants to follow the original plot line even if he doesn't save people. He still needs to grow up as Spider-Man, but the book is not bad and looks good. As long as the character of the protagonist grows up and starts to look like a real Spider-Man (PS: Just imagine the ability of three heads and eight arms, which is ugly, and It seems that the practicality is not very high at this stage. The important thing is to hold the staff with multiple hands in order to emit more spider silk. However, this is only of average use and can be completely replaced by technological armor. It also looks better than eight arms. The 360-degree field of view of three heads is not very useful, because the development and development of spider sensor is definitely better than three heads, and it is expected to be developed into a 50-kilometer spider radar)

Traveling through time travel is starting to get a little bit toxic...

Being bitten by an Acromantula 🤔 What will happen if you are bitten by a red spider 😏

Nice! Hurry for more! Not enough~