Gothic Revival, but Roman

I read a Romanian novel about Wallachia before. Now I see another one writing about Foodoro, which is really outrageous.

They have already invaded Anatolia, and they will have to massacre them in the future. After Manchikot, Anatolia has been green for a long time, and there is no core population. Even if it is revived, it will not be far from destruction. When slaughtering, you can leave behind technical talents such as doctors, judges, scholars, craftsmen, and blacksmiths. Serfs are everywhere these days. I watched a video the other day. A Turkish man did a genetic test and found that he had only 15% Turkic ancestry, and the rest was Greek ancestry. As a result, everyone was numb and laughed to death. In fact, it means that the majority of the population here is still Greek, but it has been green for a long time, so it is difficult to assimilate. There are also Armenians who can also fight hard. Heraclius was not an Armenian back then. Let's rebuild the Little Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia first and use it as a vassal shield to block the green tide in the Middle East.

There is also a very rare Jingluo that starts in Crimea.

The data on war casualties and population written by the author are simply speechless. There are now just over 2 million people in Crimea. In the 15th century, it would have been pretty good if 500,000 people died. Diodoro didn't even occupy half of Crimea, it was all mountainous. It would be great to have 100,000 people. You can actually lose 20,000 people in the war. It can also kill 4,000 young people. Even if only half of them are Diodoro's people. One fight and your whole Diodoro will be ruined.

Okay, okay, Theodoro is also a Romanian, right? Well, Romania has both Romanians and horses, so I am more correct than you😡

Embarrassing, could you please stop having so many Japanese-style love plots in medieval novels? I can't write emotional dramas. I suggest the author just explain who he married and who he had children with in a few sentences.

What are the latest pictures? There can be setbacks, but there is no need to do so. Can you still get military power later? Do you want the protagonist to become a controller who cannot talk about military affairs at all? It is important to know that when a ruler leads his troops to fight, winning or losing is very important. If he wins, just like Lionheart King, his descendants will always have a high degree of control over military power. If you lose, you have no excuse to take charge, and others won't dare to let you take charge.

The protagonist's mental state is not like that of a historical figure, but more like that of a mentally disturbed player who played EU4 all night long. Although he is in Theodosius, he cannot integrate into it at all, and his style of painting is different. There are also people who sit on the interests of the feudal nobles but always think about radical reforms to reform themselves. Many things they do are a bit taken for granted.

It's just a piece of land to start the game. The difficulty is a bit high. To be honest, it's more difficult than the mayor of Castle. To rebuild like this, the protagonist is more or less like 666 God King

If you fight for hegemony, you will fight for hegemony, coyly and lovingly. Then why are you fighting for hegemony? Can't you just lie down?