Living in 16Th Century England

You are too short, short and weak

I originally thought it was a masterpiece, but it turned out to be a masterpiece. . . Also divide the family property equally. The author, from the development process of human history, there are individuals first, then clans, then tribes, then countries, and the family becomes a country. If you divide the family resources equally, how can this family gather strength? How to develop? Return the East equally, but you would never say this if you knew better. Yes, the law says equal division, but this is also the case without a will. What's more, even now there are many classes, families, and individuals who regard the law as waste paper. Ancient times, law? What is legal belongs to law, and what is realistic belongs to reality. Three chapters later, the protagonist is like a child

Vote and vote, I have to support every author who is willing to write a novel about the Age of Discovery. If not, where can an old bookworm like me find another great wretch who is willing to write about such a niche subject (escape)

It's true that human nature is inherently evil! Many people think that the male protagonist's separation in the first chapter is a poisonous point. If these people are not only children, they are selfish people. Even my own brothers and sisters think they are more than others, or enemies! The male protagonist travels to the past and there are many ways to make money, but is he still afraid of running out of money? So it makes sense that some people are poor because they can only see a little benefit in front of them.

If you don't even highlight the cool points 😒, how many people can you expect to see it?

I read the author's previous history of America in the 19th century. The author got more and more excited as he wrote. They are all private goods (at least I think they are completely distorted values), and it is not unfair to be blocked. This book was fine in the beginning, but the last few private goods have become more and more, and I feel like I can't stop getting high. Sooner or later this book will be blocked if this continues.

No matter how toxic people say the division of family property is, I don't think it is toxic. Because, the protagonist is not only a protagonist on the path of advancement, he is also a person who has deep feelings for his younger brother and sister, and those things that are given away are always trivial to him, and he always has the ability to earn a bigger family fortune back. It's like you have three cakes in your hand now. Two cakes look big and cooked, and one cake is small, raw, and an immature industry. But you have the ability to grab flour, water and various seasonings, and you have the ability to make it into a mature cake, which is big and delicious. And if your younger brothers and sisters don't have these two loaves, their chances of starving to death are much greater than yours. In this case, do you choose to give the cooked pancakes to your younger brothers and sisters and go out to grab the flour yourself; or do you take away the two pancakes and let them become beggars without knowing whether they will live or die? Note that this is not now, but in ancient Europe. If the protagonist does not give bread, his brother will really become a beggar.

The protagonist has not yet realized that if he wants to develop, he cannot escape politics unless he takes charge of his own affairs.

Brother, can you write a good book? Do less private science popularization. It doesn't matter if you have different opinions. You don't need to make long remarks. Are you writing novels or taking classes?

If it weren't for the author's half-knowledge of the personal stuff, the novel would be pretty good. The author disdains Britain, a country of merchants. During the Napoleonic Wars, the tax rate was more than twice that of France, the country of the people. When the French had some money, they took it to Amsterdam to buy British government bonds. Even though France's population was four times that of Britain, France naturally lost in the end.

Utopia and material life are not possible today, let alone in the 1500s.

I took a brief look at it and it feels pretty good, keep it up In addition, the introduction should really be changed. If you modify it into a serious novel, more people will read it.

The distribution of family property at the beginning is just a future intention, playing an average, but the protagonist has turned all his property into the family's, and he doesn't have a dime himself. What property does the protagonist have in his name? ? According to the starting point, the protagonist can get up to 50-35%, right? ? You have a younger brother and an older sister, so there is no cutoff at the beginning. The more family property you write about, the more devalued it is, isn't it?

There are too few updates. Sometimes people won't know how awesome they can be unless they push themselves. Author, do you want to give it a try?

It's dangerous for the protagonist to be approachable

There are too many self-contained explanations and too little specific content. We came here to read the story, not to understand the history. If the update is too slow due to browsing historical materials, we can use less explanatory content. It is not a good thing to interrupt every now and then.

In the 16th century, those who did not work were beheaded

For reference only

If you really don't want to write it down, please tell me.

In ancient China, family property was divided equally? You don't think that the order of grace is equal distribution, do you? The family developed under the "Tweening Order"! If a non-eldest son can get 10% of a family property in the West, the maximum in China is 1%. The order of favor only gave the non-eldest son the opportunity to divide the family property. .

Does anyone know where the author is currently writing his book?

I want to ask, go to the book club and scold him.