Kingdom of Heaven: New Rome

This is how the Eastern Romans described the Western European wives of Emperor Manuel: "Like golden Aphrodite who loved to laugh, Hera with her fair arms and bull's eyes, Helen with her long neck and beautiful ankles who was worshiped as a god by the ancients for her beauty, and all the other beautiful beauties whose beauty is preserved in outstanding books and histories."

I didn't even understand who the main character was. Is this making up history?

This book is quite interesting. The protagonist is both a Turk and a Roman. I won't mention the writing style, but I won't mention the writing style. What I want to say is that the result of using a later scholar to skip some experiences is really good 👍

When Andronikos made people angry, he took advantage of the Norman invasion to lead his troops out, then returned with strength and stepped onto the shield?

Image source: "The Trial of War" About the word "Palestine": This was how the land was called at that time, and it is not a place name that only appeared in modern times.

I feel that the protagonist does not have the consciousness of being a hostage. He rushes out on the battlefield without obeying orders. This not only shows contempt for the imperial power but also easily leads to the failure of the war. This is a failure as a general. When countering rebellion, it is understandable that you can suppress the people, but there is no outstanding performance. For example, you can find some confidants to collect intelligence, so as to avoid some embarrassing scenes. When his predecessors were humiliated, they took advantage of them and ignored their lives. Then what are the people who were suppressed before? The lives of civilians are not as good as the glory of the general, right? If he is an upright and intelligent person, he should not suppress the people easily, but find a relatively good method. If he is a cautious and self-interested person, he should plan carefully and hide the dragon in the abyss

This book has entered the essence.

Friends come and support 😁

The author is great. Since many of the old Western European territories of the empire have been occupied by many countries that are also Christian empires, can the protagonist conquer the entire Islamic world so that although the empire has lost a lot of ancient territory, it is far larger than in its heyday?

Really good looking

It suddenly occurred to me that after Andronikos gained power, Andronikos Condostefanos, who was closely related to the protagonist, immediately died in an ugly way, and Vatazes also destroyed his family to bail out his family. Will Nikeforus take advantage of his brother?

Now that it's on the shelves, why is it still updated every day? Didn't you save the manuscript? Once it's on the shelves, update more, so I can order more. If you update every day, it will take me half a month to maintain the book.

In order to prepare for the ascetic journey in the Northeastern Mountains (Georgia) with his uncle Andronikos I, this arrangement was arranged

I am looking forward to the next plot more and more.

The quality of the text is very high, and its literary value exceeds its commercial value. It is very obscure to read and has a certain historical threshold. It feels difficult to stand out😫

Chain mail, Muslim helmet Turkic Sultan, Roman Basileus, very interesting

Is the protagonist a time traveler or a native?

The war is not realistic enough, and the role of the protagonist is too prominent. It looks a bit fake, just like a single-player game, and it is not even a strategic command game. But it seems that the novel wants to restore the historical facts as much as possible, and the inconsistencies are tangled.

Poisonous Weed, Chapter 30 is completely unbearable to me.

There are two major encirclement networks in the Western world, the anti-French encirclement network and the anti-Roman encirclement network. At this time, the Roman emperor's diplomatic ability must be strong. Venice, Serbia, Bulgaria, and the Latin people are the biggest hidden dangers of the empire. Compared with the previous dynasties, the Muslims have been weakened unprecedentedly. The Heraclius Dynasty and The Isaurian dynasty alone resisted the plague and the caliphate for two hundred years, which was the real despair. In the later period of the Macedonian dynasty, it also suffered the devastating blow of the Seljuq Empire. If one generation works hard, it is possible to restore the empire's rule over the interior of Asia Minor. After all, there are no strongholds and no Greek population in the interior of Asia Minor.

It doesn't look like a time-travel novel at all. It looks like writing a calendar, and I can't even eat a piece of pork.

The title of the book is (Rome: Renaissance in the Third Century)

According to the development of the plot, the Sultanate of Roma will start fighting among themselves. It is estimated that he should have been the Roman emperor by then, and then integrate Roma. Saladin is almost dead. Maybe he can kill the Crusader countries and control Egypt?

Can the author and protagonist restore the territory of the Roman Empire in its heyday?

What will the final layout look like? Can we take back Syria? What about Egypt?

So does the protagonist want to kill him personally to make a declaration of surrender?

I just feel like the people inside speak in a polite manner, with a sense of a mix of Chinese and Western styles.

The author is great, when will the protagonist truly become the supreme Roman Emperor of the Roman Empire?