Everyone Flees the Famine, but My Items Can Be Combined

The author of this kind of book just writes casually. You can tell by just reading the data in the book. He just slaps his head and thinks of the approximate data without thinking about it seriously. Is it right? It takes 3 minutes to decompose a cow. It takes one hour to decompose 20 cows. It takes at least ten hours to decompose two to three hundred cows. The author just slaps his head and completes the decomposition in four or five hours. Then he writes 300 kilograms to extract one kilogram. A cow can weigh a little more than 300 kilograms, and 300 cows can be decomposed at most. I smoked 400 kilograms, but the author randomly wrote the data of 1,000 kilograms. There are many contradictory points in the data. One time to synthesize cowhide, two pieces of cowhide are used, and the second synthesis is 2 to the power of 2. Finally, I made ten times of synthetic cowhide and wrote more than 300 pictures. Do you think that 2 to the tenth power is 1024? When you see this, I will say it. I guess it won't be long, and I don't take the data seriously.

Did I miss something? After ten years of drought, plants died, but animals still survived, and there were even cattle! And the description of the disappearance of water is still in a rather mysterious way. The groundwater disappears, and even the water vapor in the air is disappearing. The book also mentions "looking for water in the wild" many times. In ten years, will wild water sources still exist? Without replenishing the water cycle through groundwater and rainfall, as well as dry air that accelerates evaporation, large lakes would not last a year. Don't talk about this fantasy world. In reality, I have seen with my own eyes a small round lake with a diameter of two kilometers that completely dried up in two weeks in summer, and the depth was about seven or eight meters.

I think there are two logical conflicts in overt robbery, one is water, and the other is gold finger application The water in the air you wrote in the original article... There is almost no water, even the human bladder has no water... According to your statement, I directly imagine it is about the same as the desert Because you at least mentioned it through the protagonist Ask, "Where is the water in this world?" There is no water 500 meters underground, the air is dry and cold without water, and the evaporated water has no clouds These three points focus on describing the preciousness of water in this world Then the question comes 1. How did the protagonist survive before the plot started? There is no underground water, and the lack of water in the air means there is no dew. Even the plants are dry, and there is no lake water... 2. Can golden fingers extract purified water? Taking a bath, washing away the blood after killing people, without considering extracting water. This time it seems that water is not important? The main reason is that you highlight water in your description. It is so prominent that you wish you could throw that place at me. I deliberately cannot help but think about the issue of water! There is no groundwater 500 meters underground. That land is not desertified?

Chapter 40: I collected it for several days and destroyed a lot of wood before I could accumulate 180,000 energy. Then the weirdness struck. The protagonist activated his active skill for one second and spent 100,000 units to repel the weirdness. This felt a bit ridiculous. According to this ratio, the total number of trees in the world is not enough. I don't know if it is enough for you to spend an hour or two. How many monsters can you kill? Just based on my feeling, consuming 100 per second for this kind of data may be a bit low. I think consuming 1,000 is too much, and consuming 100,000 is too much. And this background worldview is really incomprehensible. Water has disappeared inexplicably. No water source can be found for more than ten years. How do groups of animals survive? These are big water consumers, how can plants still survive? A perfect replica of the demise of the Martians, can humans still survive? Does this kind of background setting completely ignore how to write the book later? Because logically speaking, it can only perish! I can only imagine how the protagonist can use golden fingers to save the world? I don't know if I can write it more reasonably. There is another thing that many people have complained about. When he first came into contact with the people in the shelter, the psychological activities of the protagonist really ruined the three outlooks. There is no need to write it like this. This is a proper virgin bitch. You have the ability to help others. You are unwilling to give with various excuses. Of course, it is a normal logic to survive in the apocalypse. You don't know whether the survivor is a human or a ghost. When You have the ability to do things but don't want to do them, but you complain that others don't have the ability to do them. You say that the shelter has inexhaustible resources, but you are unwilling to use them to help others. You say that the shelter has better technology, but you are unwilling to share it with others. You say that the shelter helps survivors and requires others to work. Is this really what a normal apocalyptic survivor can think of? He also ridiculed the shelter for equal trade with the wilderness people, saying that it was silly and sweet, and would not use force to force them. . . .

It's pretty good, but the upgrading of the protagonist is too tedious. There are so many opportunities to only reach the first-level intermediate level. You can obviously use the dragon egg to copy the ax and let people help you to upgrade it, but you don't do it. He often dreams that he is a general eight hundred years ago and ended the ice apocalypse.

Brother Xiaosha's writing of a book is too confusing. The protagonist is already promoted faster than others, but he always likes to suddenly find a shortcut and take off directly on the spot. His combat power jumps several times, and then he can't write. I can only say that writing books is not for money.

Author, after reading this, you can already guess that the protagonist was very good in his previous life, and his memory as a time traveler may also be problematic, but there is really no need. You have written more than 200 chapters and have already shaped the entire image of the protagonist. Goldfinger's writing is also very good, and it has attracted many readers. There is no need for you to create such an awesome past life for the protagonist. That will make the readers feel that the protagonist is very strange and make people feel that everything about the protagonist has been arranged. I have a hunch that as the author of your plot progresses and the protagonist's life experience is gradually revealed, you will lose a lot of readers. In a word, the protagonist is already written very well as an ordinary person with a golden finger who traveled through time. Why add an awesome past life to add to the story?

Author, I said before that since you revived the memory of the protagonist, your book is basically dead and will be thrown out. I am right, the book that could have been written further has been killed by you yourself. The story of ordinary people's time travel and rebirth is well written, with more than two hundred chapters written. You have to risk your life to play with creativity, and make a drama about the boss from the past life recovering his memory and returning. How many people have advised you?

Randomly adding settings and not being able to control them, the synthesis method can obviously develop very well, but later on you told me that this planet is the body of the protagonist... I have never seen anyone write it like this.

1. If the original person beats someone again, he still lives for three years with the physique of an ordinary person with two burdens. He even refused to eat for four days before his death and gave the food to women and children. What qualifications do you, a protagonist with a time-travel relationship, have to say that the original person is not good? 2. The protagonist kept scolding the people in the shelter for not helping the wilderness people despite their high technology, and requiring the wilderness people to work in exchange for supplies. Is there any problem with obtaining materials through labor? Moreover, the protagonist is saying that the shelter has high technology but does not help people. Why doesn't he use the system to help the wilderness people? Why doesn't the protagonist give the meat on his hands to others to eat? Even if the protagonist doesn't need the wolf scum, others will give him "precious" water in exchange? Quite an obvious double standard. 3. The people in the shelter need force and technology, and give the wilderness people the opportunity to exchange labor for resources. The protagonist calls the people in the shelter stupid, and the people in the shelter don't steal the things from the wilderness people. The protagonist also calls them stupid. They show goodwill to the protagonist and offer an equal status deal, but the protagonist still calls them stupid. I just don't understand, what is smart? Is it smart to point a gun directly at the protagonist's head and process materials in a small dark room before the protagonist has grown up?