I Asked You to Design Weapons, Not Start a StarCraft War!

This is purely a slap in the face article, you must really be able to study these things. Will anyone really question it? Other authors are filling their books with water, but you are filling their books with water. Many words are unnecessary. It looked so cloudy and foggy. 90% Is nonsense, and 5% is understandable. The other 5% don't understand it at all. In fact, the previous ones can be skipped completely. You can still read the part where you directly write about the electromagnetic rifle test, but be careful not to bring your head with you. (Although the author had no inspiration, he just poured water like crazy)

Can a gun with a bullet ejection speed of 4.5 Kilometers per second be usable by a human hand even if it weighs the same as an ordinary assault rifle? Forces are mutual, and the author does not think that there will be no reaction force if electromagnetic emission is used as the driving force. How much black technology is involved in the electromagnetic gun that can fire 200 rounds of bullets? A top research institute has not come up with the theory in 6 years, but one of the researchers there who is considered a big boss has the finished product. Oh, it's so awesome that there's no more to it. Let the author cut it, so as not to waste time, energy and energy. To give the author some writing advice, 1. First sort out the common sense in life. 2. What you write must conform to the logic of your own book, and cannot be inconsistent or too contrasting. 3 It is best not to challenge the three officials in today's society. 4. Use less nonsense when writing online articles. I don't like to be wordy. Rhythm is very important. 5. Each chapter is a complete short fragment and leaves a little tail. When a big story ends with a certain number of words or chapters, a big tail must be left. 6. The main line must be clear. As the branches become thicker, the trunk should also become thicker accordingly. It is best to add positive blood-burning elements to the 7 major story segments, such as the plot of the Celestial Master's performance in The Supreme Sage of Confucianism and Taoism. The ending of being a white-eyed wolf and being ungrateful is very satisfying to write. There are too many so I won't write them down. If you have a master's writing level, 1, 3. 4, 5, 7 Can be ignored.

Super nonsense literature! There is a lot of bullshit, just put aside the crazy watering. It's almost like writing code, writing a bunch of useless code. 9/10 Is all useless code, and the rest doesn't have much useful code at all. Whether it can run or not is two different things. The abbreviation deserves to be scolded. Write less nonsense, at least you will not be scolded. If you pour less water, you won't be scolded.

It can only be said that it is extremely toxic. Many of them write without even understanding the professional terms, which makes people feel that they are out of touch. Even if it is a new material, it is better to write a name directly than that, which makes people feel out of place.

Feelings from listening to the book, Bai Qishui's pretentious and slap-in-the-face YY writing.

Complete rubbish Writing something is all based on imagination haha

There's something wrong with the weapon data, and the writing is not good either.

After reading it for a long time, I was still confused and lonely.

I couldn't bear it. Once I finished reading it, I thought, good guy, you're rhyming it for me.

I tried to force the article to be cool, but it was unsuccessful. Inconsistent. I can give up writing this book. I endured the nausea and read more than ten chapters, and finally found that I could really endure it. What the hell