King of Men: Starting in Shanghai

The hostility is too strong, coupled with the incorrect outlook on things. For example, knowing that Little Japan has an ambush, and letting Little Japan kill people before going on a rampage, is there any use? It's an American hero style. One villain is killed and wounded, and the other is an anti-bandit. He's very bold.

It's obvious that he drives high and walks low. The protagonist's martial arts have become immortal, but in order to keep a low profile, he is afraid of being beaten by others. . . He abruptly reduced the price of his Tianxiang fish by half. You don't have enough IQ! At that time, is there any difference between making 100 million and making 1 billion? Are others not stupid? Your recipes are infinitely valuable. There will still be trouble when the time comes.

What did I think it was? It turned out to be the return of the Dragon King. Who is he called the Human King? How good is the Dragon King?

Can you please stop using your half-baked classical Chinese writing! It's so awkward. Do you think this can show off your writing skills?

Brainless stallion destroys people's outlook on life and casts a monthly vote just to say a few words

There was a serious sense of disconnection at the beginning, and the plot unfolded directly without any explanation or foreshadowing.

The more I watched, the less interesting it became, so I retreated.

The background and origins of the main character in a novel are not revealed, which is awesome.

The author is very creative and the content is thoughtful. Why can't the world view be more rigorous? It's really uncomfortable to look at the mess. The logical relationship can't be understood.

Take the system of state-owned land as an example. Before Shang Yang's reform, it had always been this system, but now it is called ownership by the whole people. Before the Warring States Period, it was ownership by the aristocracy. Everyone except the nobility were tenants. Wang Mang wanted to restore this system, depriving ordinary people of their land and returning it to aristocratic ownership, but he was overthrown by the property-owning people at the bottom. Please remember that this common people does not refer to farmers in the current sense, but to all property owners from poor families and from poor families, including many large landowners and businessmen. To put it simply, 99% of the people in the country opposed it and killed themselves. Then why did Wang Mang use this system to kill himself, but now we have done it? Because our state ownership is completely different from that of Wang Mang and the state ownership before the Warring States Period. They are called state-owned because the main body of the country is the nobility. Our state-owned property means that the main body of the country is the people of the whole country, including those who have no land to stand on. Now we call those people proletarians. In the past, they were called mangliu, that is, those who have no house, no land, and no household registration. Take a look at Douyin's definition of the blind flow of bandits and bandits from poor families, and you will have a reshaping of your three views. The refugees in history books are not the same concept at all as the refugees we think of. It is even 10,000 times more miserable than the so-called refugees today.