A Brat Stole My Takeout, So I Made Him Pay a Million

This novel is so enjoyable that after reading it, I wanted to find a few trolls who said the novel was not good. The first plot is so exciting. A child secretly eats a takeaway from the protagonist, and then the family of the 80-year-old takeaway kid pays him 100 yuan and also says they look down on the protagonist. Who is the protagonist? The protagonist is the chosen one in a systematic way. So in order to express his anger, the protagonist spent more than one million to make a six-year-old child homeless. This plot is very satisfying, right? There are even more exciting things to come later. The boss of the company was made to cry, and the woman who dropped her cell phone was made to cry without tears. But these are what they deserve. They have offended the chosen one, and they are lucky to be alive. Come on, author, update, it's so beautiful, don't pay attention to the trolls other than me, they are just jealous that your IP address is Beijing.

The first case doesn't feel right no matter how I think about it. The protagonist should not live broadcast and change the title. Knowing that children will eat his own takeout, he changed the title before the incident happened and interrupted the audience. After ordering the takeout, he deliberately guided the children to eat it. He watched the live broadcast and did not stop it. Even if the protagonist suffered losses, it is the protagonist who is mainly responsible because he committed an induced crime and offered compensation. He was suspected of extortion. Even if he was convicted, he should not be sentenced to full compensation. In the end, his live broadcast of induced crimes should be stopped from the live broadcast room. Even if you give me a lesson, you shouldn't broadcast it live. I did it on purpose, but I won't say it, and I won't bet on it. If so, it's subjective guidance.

People write that the recharge is one million, but you write that takeout is one million, or that it is as big as a KFC family bucket,,,,, they are more serious and by the way, what are you talking about? 🤤It should be more or less logical.

Ten million is enough to bankrupt most families in the country. This relative did have bad views and wanted to take advantage, but the law dictated that whatever the law dictated, a fine of 100,000 yuan was already the maximum punishment. You deliberately recycle action figures to the point of destroying other people's families, whether it's passers-by or relatives, it's too much. Author, when you wrote it, I would be happy if the other person lost it and was dealt with, but framed your own relatives in this way (although it's not so disgusting, it's not so irreconcilable) is beyond the level of a lesson.

What the hell, if you don't sign for takeaways worth millions, who the hell dares to leave?

Let the author tell me about a million takeaways. One person can take it.

A million takeaways, this is the bad nature of a poor loser who can ruin his family all at once, but he can get a hundred thousand, which not only educates others, but is within the range that others can afford, and will not ruin his family. In other words, he still rents a house to live in, and is not afraid of others hacking him to death. No wonder they say that the poor cannot be sympathized with.

It is recommended that the author learn more about the law. The crime of picking quarrels and provoking trouble is not a small crime.

After seeing the introduction, what kind of takeout can be worth a million?

I feel that if this person was not the protagonist, offended and drove so many people to panic, he would probably have been killed by someone on the way home with an ax or kitchen knife, and then the murderer committed suicide. I have seen several murders like this, and the reason was that they drove people to panic.