Simulating Immortality in a World of Calamity

To sum up, the further you go, the better it gets. The protagonist is decisive in killing, unlike the weak protagonist who has no woman in his heart and is a god of nature with his sword drawn. Bandit soldiers brought trouble to the countryside, killing them, and defeated thousands of troops with one sword. The world is in unrest, Emperor Liang has no principles, and demons are in trouble. He will rebel just as he says. By mastering the power of heaven and earth in the simulation, it is quite satisfying to move mountains and cut off rivers, to cut off fifty states with one sword, and to cut off all the injustices in front of you.

What kind of strange understanding do people have of decisive killing and killing nowadays? Decisiveness in killing is itself a way of making choices. Where there is a choice, there is a choice. If you were the emperor and your prince had to kill you to usurp the throne because of the surrounding forces, what would your choice be? You must have a compassionate heart and a father-son relationship. You just defeated the prince without killing him and chose to imprison him. You had no macro vision and strategy, which led to the immortality of the prince's remnants. In the end, you rescued the prince and then caused chaos in the world and took the opportunity to rebel against you. Or maybe wait until you are old and secretly assassinate you and your other sons so that the prince can regain the throne. You didn't choose to kill decisively, so you ended up in trouble or failed. Or maybe you and your siblings are fighting against each other. Although you are in a dominant position, your brother is also popular. At this time, the counselors around you advise you to kill your brother, but you choose to be benevolent and righteous. As a result, your brother kills you and takes the throne. This is called not decisive in killing. When is the right time to act decisively against enemies, evildoers and bandits? Can these actions without any sacrifice of oneself be called decisive in killing?

What I want to see is an intelligent protagonist

It looks so good. Why are they writing disaster relief articles, either to rescue floods or droughts, or to rescue plagues? The new crown has been going on for several years. Haven't you had enough of it? Bye bye, flash people!

It's so beautiful😭, I've never seen such a beautiful book in my life😭

I hope there will be more female protagonists, after all, normal people need wives

Popular Science Extra Today someone asked about the life span of mortals in the world of the protagonist at the beginning. They said that people in ancient times were generally only forty years old. Not to mention that this is an extraordinary world, it is not difficult for real ancient adults to live fifty or sixty years. To popularize science, we must first know how the average life span is calculated. The reason why the average life span in ancient times was low was because their infant mortality rate was high, and many babies did not live long. In fact, it is not difficult for people who live to adulthood to live in their sixties, so there is a saying that they are seventy years old. Based on the statistics about the Ming Empire recorded in Chapter 9 of "The Cambridge History of China, Volume 2 of the Ming Dynasty", the estimated lifespan of death in Chart 9-3 on page 421 shows that it is not difficult to live beyond the age of fifty or sixty, especially before the Tatars conquered China, when more than sixty years old was not a rare thing. Actually, with the development of modern medicine in the 20th century, after the infant mortality rate plummeted, the world's average life expectancy skyrocketed. Within a few decades, did modern people suddenly live longer than ancient people? No, it was just that the life span of adults no longer averaged the average of a large number of infants who died young. Look at the following set of figures: In 1900, the average life expectancy of Americans was only 47 years old (the popularization of cowpox), rose to nearly 60 years in the 1930s (the popularization of sulfa drugs), and was close to 70 years old in 1960 (the popularization of penicillin); correspondingly, from 1938 to 1956, the death rate among children in the United States dropped by more than 90%. The situation in Japan is similar. In 1900, the average life expectancy of Japanese people was only 44 years old (the popularization of cowpox method), rose to nearly 50 years old in the 1940s (sulfa drugs), and exceeded 60 years in 1955 (the popularization of penicillin).

It feels very similar to "I Have a Demon Simulator", and there are elements of reference.

It's okay but the first part is too unreasonable. Obviously you can get cheat coins in real life, but if you keep simulating all the time in the early stage, you can simulate infinitely without any consumption! Can't you interact reality and simulation together? If you cannot set a limit on the number of times you can simulate a copy and the consumption will increase every time you simulate it, then you can write it in reality! Isn't it a simulation coin that can kill ghosts in reality?

Is there a female protagonist? Or harem