I Remade It, but I Never Meant to Outdo the Original

This book really gave me a surprise. At present, among all the entertainment categories I have watched, there is only one film that can compete with this one. Why? To put it bluntly, other entertainment articles are probably either plagiarized or using cheats, and can only write new ideas in certain places. When I first wrote about how to impress the audience, I either relied on the original thing, or boasted about how similar my performance was, or relied on golden fingers. Li Du's poems have been passed down through the ages, but they are no longer new. As for this work, it relies on the plot to shine. You think this is a bad movie, okay, I'll change it into a good movie, so why do you think this movie is good? Alas, I wrote it so that you can understand it, so that you can be attracted, and so that you feel that my modification is very good, and the pleasure will come one after another. For example, there are three rooms in the opening chapter. In this way, through words, we can continuously express how the plot of a work is presented to the audience in a relatively complete and detailed way. If the first two story chapters of Fang Sanjian are still based on Zhu Yi's imitation, then the third story: Looking back on life and being ridiculed by all living things, it gives people a very amazing feeling. Both the author and his characters have come out of Fangshan under the influence of Zhu Yi and have developed their own style. This sense of growth is great. In previous entertainment articles, it can only be said that their descriptions of this are not good enough, or even rough. The response has been tremendous, the box office is amazing, and the fans are crazy. Rather than reading entertainment articles, it is better to read urban articles. If we say that the three rooms in the opening chapter are just a small masterpiece. The remake of "The Dream Show" not only hits the topic but also brings surprises to people. To be honest, I haven't watched Dream Chaser Entertainment Circle, I've only read some movie reviews and netizens' fun. Therefore, I only know the original work from what I have heard from netizens, and the expression of the work is very confusing. Because I haven't read it, I won't comment on the original work, but netizens' comments and ratings still have certain reference standards. But the author's expression of the remake's plot is indeed very good. When I read the article, I was still a little itchy. In the past, the scripts of Three Days Defense always told you the plot before remaking it. Why did they suddenly stop telling you this time? In the end, the plot was actually written out through a film critic. Not only was it written out, but it was also written out through this film review in a way that we can understand. It has the beauty of art without breaking away from the public, which is really great. Later, the plot was further supplemented through interviews with the author by film critics. It can be said that this is the first great point of this article. Now that I have seen the second part of Shanghai Fortress, which is being remade, I have read the original movie, so I am even more looking forward to what the author can make Shanghai Fortress look like. And like the author, let Jiang Nan finish writing the Dragon Clan quickly. (But today's high-quality dragon fan fiction is really good)

This book refreshed my understanding of human intelligence and understanding. There are people in this world who can't understand the meaning of editing and remaking, especially the author. This is so awesome.

How to solve the copyright issue of remake?

After reading sixty chapters, the plot is slow, good and edible. There are slight flaws in the front. Many people may not like to find a job and then resign, but I personally think it is very realistic, and the progress of the early plot is relatively slow, but it is primitive accumulation, and there must be a process. The subsequent plot unfolds and becomes more and more interesting. Except for the real estate manager, the few female characters currently appearing are not likable. The female teacher is a passer-by, helping the male protagonist to get started. She has been offline for the time being and hopes to complete the project. Of course, it is okay to make a cameo occasionally and help out a little. The two models are a bit disgusting. Although it is not shabby to make money for a living, others are disgusting. They are not as comfortable as the foot-washing girl. After all, the foot-washing girl is just a transaction, and the two models use people as a springboard. Although this is the case in reality, in the novel, this slap in the face must be arranged for them. The plot of the movie is a bit stitched together. I hope it won't be artistic to the end in the follow-up. If I don't have money in the early stage, it's good to be artistic. In the later stage, it will be integrated with business. Good movies are both commercial and literary, and they must be watched by people.

Can the author's three views be correct: Duan Zhuqing is a married woman and is preparing for pregnancy. Can she write better? Some can be written, and some cannot be written randomly. No matter what you say, it is still a public work and has a media nature. Not only are you flirting with a married lady, you are also an acquaintance. I just want to ask if your wife likes this too.

The introduction says there is no female protagonist, but many female supporting characters. The author's comment section also says there are many female characters, but no main palace. How should readers understand? Based on the current content, does it mean that you have ambiguities with many female characters, or are you limited to ambiguities?

The main character doesn't have a golden finger and it's very dramatic. The reason is simple. You don't have a golden finger, and you haven't studied any related majors. You don't even have a wild background. The poor man in front suddenly turned into a monkey in the sky. How can he be so capable?

This is called no heroine, indeed. Piles and piles of female characters, the sea is full of female characters, all the men are extinct

Author, you actually wrote that Guli Nazha was innocent, and that Nazha could not see that the male protagonist had a girlfriend. The veteran driver Guli Nazha is thirty years old, and her bed photos have been exposed after several relationships.

Is this a novel without a heroine? The part about having dinner with Sister Sun was so ambiguous. I thought I was the heroine, but I just missed the point. I forced my resignation in the next chapter. Is this the so-called lack of a heroine? If you don't have a heroine, don't write it so ambiguously. Just be a tool, like the girl in 603, that's fine…