Peter, Hogwarts Professor of Defense Against the Dark Arts

The background tone of the whole book is a bit unbearable. Let's not talk about the pig's foot scene and Snape's scene. Let's just talk about the background setting. In the original book, Harry's father regretted not playing tricks in the end, so Snape didn't die. But now Snape Pu is dead, and Lily is still married to him, and she doesn't feel anything when she was killed as a child, I can only say that the whole group is so disgusting, people die without punishment,, even Dumbledore's hypocrisy is a bit more disgusting than the original work. . . This is no different from the issue that Rowling was criticized for. Is it possible to go to the women's restroom if you recognize that you are a woman? Can a kind werewolf go to school without any supervision? When something went wrong, no one was punished. He didn't even have any third thoughts. Not to mention a few young people who killed people. Dumbledore had the dignity to continue being the principal after killing a student. The entire Pig's Foot group had no moral integrity. They were disgusting people. Peter the Pig's Foot actually wanted to help Sirius defend himself. How many people do you expect to read this book?

I came here to read the article because of its popularity. I have finished reading the current part and would like to express my personal feelings after reading it. First of all, it is the protagonist of this article. As the protagonist, Peter from time travel has been given many honors by the author. He is the president of the male student body, a double agent, a war hero, and a recipient of the Order of Merlin. His popularity is comparable to Lockhart (but considering his setting as a combat hero, this is reasonable). As a reader who prefers Snape, what I am most curious about is why the author assigned him the identity of "double agent". The word "double agent" should be most closely related to Snape in the Harry Potter series, right? If the author wants to add honor to the protagonist and emphasize how crucial his role in the war is, he can create many original honorary titles and plots, such as how brave he fought, etc. It is really indescribable to me to give the title of Snape in the original book to the predator who is his mortal enemy. The second is character creation. The image of Dumbledore in the article is difficult to describe in one word, and I personally think it is extremely bad. My personal understanding of him is that Dumbledore is not a pure holy father figure. He has always had a cold and secretive side. As his brother said, "I learned to keep secrets while still at my mother's knees." This can be seen from his close relationship with Grindelwald, planning together to find the Deathly Hallows and rule the Muggles, as well as some of his mistakes in the original book, but these do not prevent him from becoming the most benevolent and powerful leader in the entire series. But the image of Dumbledore in the article is completely opposite to me. Judging from the description, Dumbledore's "kindness" and "emotional" in the article are extremely superficial. He talks about guilt verbally, but is stingy about letting the other person finish what he said. Even if he is "guilty", he has to forcefully overwhelm the other person and only care about his own emotional expression. For no apparent reason, he was allowed to teach and yet he was clearly on guard, allowing the protagonist to teach as a "check and balance". He almost writes "hypocrisy" and "calculation" on his face, speaks with a mask of hypocrisy, and secretly exports his own opinions and wishes. He thinks he is hiding it well, but in fact it is obvious that his personal tendencies are extremely strong. Some of the descriptions of Dumbledore in HP fanfics have always been my point of abandoning the article. However, the plots of "random Legilimency students" or "adding veritaserum to sweet tea" are far less powerful than the description of Dumbledore in this article. The more he expresses his guilt in words in front of Snape, the stronger the contrast with his actual actions becomes. "I brought another werewolf to Hogwarts." So, where did this werewolf come from? To me, the principal is responsible for this. He attracted werewolves to the school but failed to take preventive measures, resulting in the death of students. This means that he allowed all students in the school to bear this risk without their knowledge. Judging from the part in the article, Dumbledore did not make any compensation to Snape despite being responsible (he is indeed a victim here, and it has nothing to do with whether Dumbledore likes to believe it or not, it is only due to the principal's responsibility to the students) (as of the time I wrote this review, it was not mentioned in the article). Snape's ability to save his life depends entirely on his mother Irene. Neither he nor the robber paid a price. If the original Dumbledore chose the latter between the safety of a student and the life of a student, that would make sense (of course, the text could also be that since one person is dead, the life of the other must be saved, which would also work). As for the treatment of dropping out of school, Blake has inherited the family property, and Lu Ping originally graduated normally and had no fixed job, which is no different from the ending mentioned in the introduction. The other two married a wife and had children and had a happy family, and a war hero gained glory. Of course, the author may also think that Black just reminded Snape that Snape wanted to die and ran to the shed, and he deserved the whole incident. If the author holds this view, then this issue has no meaning for us to discuss. I personally like the relationship between Snape and Dumbledore in the original book very much. They are not that close, but as partners or companions, they have irreplaceable meaning for each other. However, according to the author's setting, it is foreseeable that this will not appear in the article. Finally, this article is indeed very original, but a lot of changes have also brought about many plot and character changes. The author's reply to me in the article was mainly about the parent generation. I also want to see how the author will describe the parent generation and look forward to the next plot.

Let the author put it this way. I am a relatively newbie, so I don't have much choice when reading articles. As long as they are not very poisonous, this book title is not very friendly to those Snape fans.

This book gives me only one feeling: the three views are incorrect

Pettigrew has no sense of immersion at all.

After watching it for a long time, I rated it as boring and not interesting.

The Lily here is too rubbish. The original Lily couldn't do this.

By the way, has the protagonist become thinner or is he still as round as before? 😏😏

What the hell are you doing, author, who is the protagonist? It's still Snape! Is Peter a time traveler? To be honest, I have read more than 30 chapters, and I have been puzzled from the beginning to the end. I feel that your novel has no focus. You have arranged such a background of deep hatred for Snape, but you have not highlighted anything exciting later, deliberately torturing the protagonist.

This novel is written so much like the original that I almost thought Rowling herself came to Qidian to write the book. There is no sensational plot at the beginning. The pace is slow and poor results are inevitable (perhaps we can change the title to an eye-catching title?), But it is also this pace that is particularly attractive. I don't know what the characterization of the characters is more foreshadowing. This book makes me feel comfortable reading it, and I feel like I am back in that magical world. Come on, author, I may not be able to read every day due to time reasons. I will give you three recommendation votes. I hope you can write what you want to write.