Dream of the Red Chamber: I Snatched Lin Daiyu from the Start

I was looking forward to this book, but when the author wrote about the concept of equality for all, I removed it from my bookshelf without hesitation. The most annoying thing is that in ancient times, everyone was said to be equal, and he rebelled and became the emperor. Everyone is not equal in modern times. You played with this concept in ancient times.

Tomorrow I will write a book about robbing Grandma Liu and Mrs. Jia, and the name will be called Grandma Liu Trying to Love Again.

I just saw someone robbing Qin Keqing and rolled it up.

The Bandit Emperor of the Red Mansion, you are robbing Qin Keqing, you are robbing Lin Daiyu, it seems Xue Baochai is not far away😂

Everyone is equal. A beggar can also be an emperor. Why don't you give up the role quickly? After the beggar is done, it will be Chunlou Toubai's turn to be the emperor tomorrow.

What is equality of personality? In ancient times, you said that everyone is equal and still has personality. Isn't this funny? Can personality be equal despite the gap in status?

Everything else is fine. Overthrowing domestic slavery and sending all children to school is a suicide attempt. This is overthrowing the feudal system. They will most likely kill the protagonist regardless of the White Lotus. The protagonist and the White Lotus are fundamentally different, and the landlords and nobles are not all fools who can't see it. It would be fine if the protagonist has hundreds of thousands of his own soldiers (this is still the bottom line that hundreds of thousands of soldiers are summoned by the system and will not retaliate), but he only has 300 people, and the emperor Wang Mang is gone, let alone the protagonist? Where did he get the courage? The spirit is commendable but it is impossible to succeed😊

Equality for everyone doesn't work, it offends too many people. First of all, you are a rebel and have offended the court, a vested interest group. You have also offended the landlords of aristocratic families. Of course, the common people are the majority, but you have also offended the common people. In ancient times, the clan system was greater than the sky, and equality for all equaled the abandonment of the clan system. The same three principles and five permanent members, the patriarchal system ensured that the ancients must be filial to their elders and reduced the risk of people's retirement. You, who are equal to everyone, have also offended them. Can you expect women to understand your philosophy and immediately go to the battlefield to help you? Excluding half of the women, 10% of the bureaucratic class group, 10% of the vested interests of the landlord clan, and 10% of the middle-aged and elderly pensioners and paternalistic vested interests, you have too few supporters.

I originally wanted to support him, but after seeing the county town, I no longer want to watch it. The protagonist has no stable food and grass, no stable territory, no army, and no talents, so he shouts slogans like everyone is equal. It's so embarrassing. Goodbye. . .

I suggest the author remove the revolutionary thoughts. Well, people who come to see the Red Mansion are not here to make revolution. It's so jarring. Without the background of the times, the only way to force revolution is to rely on plug-ins. The protagonist is just a tool, nothing exciting at all. This is completely separated from the background of the world, isn't it against harmony? If you have a modern background, it's easier to say. At least you have a complete set of logic.