It Turns Out That I Really Am the Villain!

It's good to watch, but not that good. Overall, it's a bit "scattered", with a bit of a blur here and there, and the coherence is not very good (including the advancement of time and the excessive plot) At the same time, there are too many emotional descriptions, but they are not very in-depth and most of them have no practical meaning, which makes it even more "scattered". (It cannot be ruled out that I, a loyal fan of single female protagonists, wear colored glasses) The protagonist is not that "characteristic", and the supporting roles are much better portrayed than the protagonist Of course there are many advantages, but in fact the "scattered" feeling mentioned in the first article is a bit heavier

The villain is kind and the righteous is cruel. What's the point of writing something like this that reverses traditional good and evil?

After seeing the introduction, I thought he was a decisive and decisive villain who does all kinds of evil. The result is a spoof article, summarizing: daily life with interracial girlfriends 😅😅😅

"The Barefoot Doctor's Manual", "Friends of Dual-Purpose Talents", "Militia Training Manual", "Extremely Powerful and Practical - Unlimited Combat Techniques!" Simple, practical, high-quality collection value, recommended to you

The plot feels a bit baffling.

Dear book lovers! This is the first book I really started writing, and I finally got it signed, so I definitely won't be a eunuch. I will also carefully read your suggestions and incorporate them into modifications. Thank you all!

Shouldn't the effect of "Walking Disaster" be that disasters happen wherever you go? 🤔 Natural disasters generally refer to natural disasters, which are different from man-made disasters such as war😂

It's too stream-of-consciousness. The writing is indeed good, but it's too Riddler-like. The more I read, the less I know what the plot is. . .

Your characters and setting are really fascinating to me. But it's a bit too scattered, without a main line, that is, I don't know why they do these things and what their purpose is I have now read Chapter 19. If that lady is of high status. Can you express it a little bit in the book? When I was watching, I was particularly curious, why didn't the bishop resist? The protagonist said something later, which is the same old problem that the previous few people raised with you. It's too scattered, and too Riddler-y. Hopefully the author will change this.

There is no foreshadowing, and many things are thrown out of thin air, which seems very baffling.

Thank you for your book reviews! I will try to create a clearer main line to improve your reading experience.

There are too many typos, and even if someone points them out in the paragraph, they won't correct them. It's really uncomfortable to watch.

Can anyone tell me what this novel is like?

It's a pretty good book, why are there only these few comments?

It's pretty good, except for the name, which is a bit inconsistent. I'd like to ask how many female protagonists there are (blindly guess whether there are three).

Update soon, there are too few, I will give you the recommendation vote.

Did the author write a previous urban recovery article?

There is no skill, it's all emotion, although I haven't understood it yet

I really doubt that this was written by several people, otherwise it wouldn't be like this all of a sudden, and then keep doing that, and the copy would be lengthened and watered down.

The writing is really good. Please be patient and read Chapter 30 to understand.