
The Yongle Era of the Ming Dynasty
大明永乐
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 156k Words
- Genre
- Historical
- Subgenre
- Song-Yuan-Ming Dynasties
- Updated
- 4y ago
- Source
- Qidian
Stats
72Chapters
0Votes
11.5kRecs
9.9kFans
Tags
Synopsis
More by this author
Readers also read
A Guide to Building Civilization in a Primitive Tribe
Daming: Asking for the Throne at the Beginning, Lao Zhule Went Crazy
My Only Method: I Will Add More Points to Become Stronger at the End of Ming Dynasty
My Father Is Wen Tianxiang, and We Win the Battle of Yashan from the Start
A Record of a Mortal's Journey to Immortality: I Earn Immortality by Grinding Achievements for Rewards
The Sun and Moon Endure Forever
My Big Brother Is Called Zhu Chongba
Lord Evolution
A Record of a Mortal's Journey to Immortality: Choosing Hextech in the Chaotic Star Sea
I Found the First Emperor
The Ming Dynasty: Starting with Caution
Great Ming: My Brother Is Zhu Yuanzhang, and I'm Founding America
Becoming a Noble in the Spring and Autumn Period
Those Years at Super God Academy
Blood of the Han
The Mighty Han
The Universe of Super God Academy
The Great Lord of Spring and Autumn
Conquering the World
The Qin Empire Rises Again
Reader comments 40
Google Translate
It can be seen that the author has quite a bit of resentment towards Confucianism and Zhu Gaochi, Zhu Zhanji and his son. I can completely point out that this is a wrong idea. I do not deny that they have done some extremely wrong things, but I think it is also very wrong for the author to use private goods to eliminate evil. Let's analyze them one by one. First of all, the author thinks that Zhu Gaochi's lineage is not okay just because Zhu Qizhen was born. This is not okay. Let's not say that you have completely ignored the impact of the protagonist's arrival on the future. Based on this logic, I can completely say that if Li Shimin had not inherited the throne, Wu Zetian would not have had the Anshi Rebellion, which is nonsense. First of all, we must understand that the Anshi Rebellion and Zhu Zhanji's abandonment of Jiaozhi and the withdrawal of Nurgandusi were inevitable events in history, while the Tumu Fort change was an accidental event. For example, the reason why Zhu Zhanji gave up Jiaozhi had negative consequences as early as the Yongle period, because the officials sent here basically exacted excessive taxes. It would be strange that the people of Jiaozhi didn't rebel. Coupled with the geographical factors, not to mention that you have to climb over mountains to enter Guangxi, and to enter North Vietnam from Guangxi, you have to climb over 100,000 mountains. Only those with no brains can understand how much this loss is. Moreover, there were few foreign expeditions during the Renxuan period because Guo Li was overdrawn during the Yongle period, which forced him to recuperate. Why did the common people rebel in Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty in his later years? It is because the overdraft of people's power has forced the people to rebel. This must stop! Then there is the issue of Confucianism, which has been around for a long time. As I said at the beginning, I do not deny some of his wise operations, but first of all, we must understand that if it is really a "ruling faction" full of shortcomings, can he not step down for two thousand years? Co-author Are all politicians over the past two thousand years fools? Let me put it more harshly, if the Mohists, Military strategists, Legalists, Taoists, etc. Have been in power for two thousand years, they must be better than Confucianists? Especially the satirical part about the great Confucians made me laugh. It was true, but the time was absolutely wrong. In the early Ming Dynasty, almost everyone who had the courage to do so could be counted. This kind of people gradually appeared from the mid-Ming Dynasty, to be precise, from the Hongzhi period. Why? Professor Fang Zhiyuan once talked about why people like Wang Yangming and Tang Bohu were born only in this period. It was because the Ming Dynasty entered a period of relatively open social atmosphere. It was absolutely impossible for these people to appear in the conservative social environment and political situation of the early Ming Dynasty. (If you really think that I am a Confucian scholar or something, then I can't help it. After all, I am not forcing you to accept my point of view.) On another note, Zhu Gaoxu is really not suitable to be an emperor. If being an emperor really only requires good military ability, then I can only say that this Guo Jia is not far from being defeated. [Finally, I attach some excerpts from "The Biography of Emperor Xuande" by teacher Zhao Zhongnan. I think what is written in it is very pertinent]
Fang Xiaoru had no merit in the imperial examination at all. In the 30th year of Hongwu, the imperial examination was held every three years. If Fang Xiaoru really understood the knowledge, how could he fail the examination? How can we talk about the terms politician and thinker if we don't even understand Confucianism? Fang Xiaoru's teacher was Song Lian, the same Song Lian who wrote the "Preface to Ma Sheng in Dongyang", the Song Lian who wrote the epitaph for Kong Kejian, the sage of the Yuan Dynasty, and used the Yuan Dynasty title. It was very problematic for Song Lian to be an official in the Ming Dynasty, but there was no problem for Song Lian to be a scholar. Fang Xiaoru studied under Song Lian, but couldn't even pass the examination. Is that Song Lian's problem or Fang Xiaoru's problem? Fang Xiaoru was recommended as an official by Wu Chen twice. The first time Zhu Yuanzhang said: This Zhuang scholar should be regarded as old and talented, and he should be sent back with courtesy. The second time Zhu Yuanzhang said: This is not the time to be filial to Confucianism. At the beginning of the founding of the Ming Dynasty, there was a thirst for talents. If Fang Xiaoru had some talent, he would be reused. The first time Zhu Yuanzhang said that he was too young and old and could be used, and the second time he simply said that he had no talent. How did Fang Xiaoru become an official? Being the teacher of the prince of Shu, he entered the court as an official. Zhu Di was admitted to Nanya by Feng Tianjingnan and died. Among the 141 people, there were eunuchs, bureaucrats, and garrison soldiers. Zhu Di carved stones to record their loyalty, but Fang Xiaoru was not among them. Is Fang Xiaoru, the one hundred and forty-one person who does not have to live in poverty, more worthy of praise? Fang Xiaoru hid when Zhu Di came to Beijing, hoping to escape, and then he was arrested. In the end, he was executed for the crime, including his elder brother.
No, Zhu Di was not born to Empress Ma. If he was born to Empress Ma, he would be the legitimate second son. After Zhu Biao's death, Zhu Di's right to inherit the throne would be Zhu Di's, and it would not be Zhu Yunwen's turn.
Why do I feel that the author is pretending to be confused? The author knows that the Duoyan Sanwei is not the Ming army's combat order in history, which means he has checked the information. Why can he still write the Tumubao civilian conspiracy theory in the book? This kind of stuff is made up by a group of unlearned people on Tianya and Zhihu to attract attention. What else can it do besides misleading people?
This kind of SB operation can only spread his family tree to the sky. If I didn't respect the author, I would be painting pictures in it every day.
"History of the Ming Dynasty" records that Empress Ma gave birth to five sons and two daughters: the eldest son, Prince Yiwen Zhu Biao, the second son, King Min of Qin Zhu Ping, the third son, King Gong of Jin Zhu Fan, the fourth son of Ming Chengzu, Zhu Di, the fifth son, King Zhu Ding of Zhou; and two daughters, Princess Ningguo and Princess Anqing. However, Pan Taizhang, a historian in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties, said in "Research on National History": According to the Ming Dynasty royal family genealogy, the fourth son of Taizu, Ming Chengzu Zhu Di, and the fifth son, King Zhou Ding, were born to Empress Xiaocigao. But we can also know that there are two legitimate sons in front of Zhu Di, and it is not his turn to inherit the throne. Why Zhu Yunwen, because the two brothers behind Zhu Biao were incompetent and were almost expelled from the king's title. Zhu Di was also not suitable. Otherwise, where would the first two be placed? I'm afraid there would be internal fighting, and the identity of the legitimate son needs to be investigated. It may be his changed identity when he became emperor. Zhu Yuanzhang also knew that the second-generation emperor could no longer fight random wars and build a country that could not be conquered. Zhu Yunwen was more suitable. His younger brother seemed to have been crippled by education. In addition, his relative was not strong and was close to the literati, so he could control the court. But I didn't expect Zhu Yunwen to be such a trash, he was too good at pretending, and he was a bit cruel.
Why are you flooding the comment section? Very bad character, okay?
[In 1404 (the second year of Yongle), Yao Guangxiao paid homage to Dr. Zishan and Prince Shaoshi, and his surname was changed to Yao, and he was given the name Guangxiao. The name Yao Guangxiao only came into being in the second year of Yongle. When the protagonist first appeared, he should be called Monk Daoyan. When Yao Guangxiao comes up, he doesn't even know that you are calling him. And I feel that this starting setting is a bit awkward. In fact, if you start normally, it will be fine. This kind of sudden drop from the sky will feel very inconsistent no matter how you write it later.
So the question is, as an official of the old Zhu family, how can you turn the tide and avoid the Cricket Emperor, the God of War Emperor, the Confucian Emperor and an emperor who spent his life in war and doubt? By luck?
I still think your historical text is guaranteed, but the update is not very good. The Great Lord version is updated once a day, but this time it is even worse.