Movie Savior

I never thought that one day I would find a book with myself as the protagonist on the daily guide, and I was heartbroken

How about this powered armor? There is also reinstallation

First of all, I have an inexplicable feeling that it is getting uglier and uglier. (Of course I will still automatically subscribe to support the author) In the past, I would still look forward to what kind of sparks would be created when the disasters of the new world encountered new technologies in other time and space? As a result, the protagonist is just constantly saving people, and there is not much description of the economic development of time and space, and the integration of science.       Originally, I was looking forward to the description of the economic development part, but as a result, this process was repeated over and over again, which really made people's perception plummet. Even though I subscribed automatically, I already had dozens of chapters, so I was too lazy to read them and skipped them. Regarding the development of economy and new technology, I was originally looking forward to the description, but the author waved his hand and found nothing. It is constantly [Discovering a new world → Disaster → Mutual Rescue Association will find a way → Europe and the United States are monsters → We are super gods → Trying our best to make the official trust → End of the problem → Discovering a new world] Later, I carefully searched for the reasons for my bad impression, and then I discovered that it turns out that my taste is tricky, and I really like science fiction works. Including but not limited to all of Liu's works, needless to say the most awesome of them, "The Three-Body Problem", "Chaos Butterfly", "Age of Angels", "Once Upon a Time in the Cretaceous", "Time Migration", "The Wandering Earth", I have read all of them, as well as "The Golden Fields" which shocked me so much that I looked up at the stars. Of course, there are also Asimov's "The Last Question", "The Final Answer" and so on. And, Arthur C. Clarke's "The Forgotten Enemy" and so on.                                                                                                 Really good science fiction works never hesitate to criticize human beings, but what do you say about this book? Anyway, we are so awesome! Feelings, thoughts about race, thoughts about human beings, and their descriptions of the dream of looking up at the stars. But now, not only do I repeat [Discover a new world → Disaster → Mutual Rescue Association will find a solution → Europe and the United States act like monsters → We are super gods → Try our best to make the official trust → End of the problem → Discover a new world], I almost doubt the necessity of further reading. (The main thing is, forget it after you finish writing, and the result is... In short, book friends have already said it.) At first, I wanted to read this book with the mentality of reading books by science fiction gods. The result... It's hard to describe in one word. I can only say that the great god is worthy of being a great god, and it's beyond what humans can do! (Really, when I first watched the story of Snow Country, I was a little happy, and I was filled with joy that the author was finally going to learn from the masters and criticize the bad nature of mankind) Thinking about it now, among us, there are really very few authors who can criticize us like Da Liu. (Note: I remember in an interview, Liu talked about "Three-Body·Two·Dark Forest", in which the group of people who are difficult to describe are criticizing our bad habits based on who we were back then.) And in this world, in short, we are all kinds of super gods, as if we are perfect and have no shortcomings I always feel that my inner requirements for the author of this book seem to be a bit high. Basically, you have to be at least partially close to the master of science fiction. However, this constant repetition, repetition, repetition of the plot is really annoying to me. (The key is that you write it well. For example, Liu's human extinction plan, or his extreme optimism about mankind's doomsday war, are very poor compared to your subject matter, and can even be said to be old-fashioned. Others still write it well and realistically... Maybe this is a problem with the writing style.)

Drive high and go low, the protagonist of this book is too holy. You are a savior, not a nanny. Some people don't want you to save them, so you force them to save them. This is disgusting.

The author may have underestimated the horror of the world of "Finch" After seeing the description of the world by the "Finch people" in "Agriculture in the Building", I think the author may have underestimated the impact of the massive destruction of the ozone layer on the world. Looking at the author's description, my feeling is that Fincher's world is just an extremely hot world during the day, but the fact is far more than that. First of all, the massive destruction of the ozone layer is not only caused by the sharp rise in temperature during the day. The ozone layer is also the quilt of the earth, which can prevent the rapid loss of temperature. According to the daytime temperature of 70 degrees, and the ozone layer may not be destroyed (it would be even worse if it was completely destroyed), then the temperature at night is very likely to be around -40 degrees, or even lower. This kind of temperature difference between day and night of up to 100 degrees is first and foremost a severe test of life. People get sick constantly and plants find it difficult to survive. Then there is the test of the material. Rapid temperature changes will make the steel brittle and easily cracked and damaged. Extreme temperatures make most components unable to withstand such a drastic change, let alone such a drastic change. The author mentioned nuclear power, so let me also talk about the impact of temperature on nuclear power. You can find a lot of effects of high-temperature weather on nuclear power with a casual search. The thermal efficiency of nuclear power at 30 to 40 degrees is obviously affected, not to mention how much thermal efficiency is used in 70-degree nuclear power plants for power generation (thermal power also uses thermal efficiency to generate electricity). Then there is the low temperature at night. The currently operating nuclear power plant with the highest latitude in my country is the Hongyanhe Nuclear Power Plant in Liaoning. The Hongyanhe Nuclear Power Plant mentioned that the most important thing in winter is to prevent the water inlet from being blocked by ice. Then to talk about other electric power generation at night, you can look at the tragic situation of Texas experiencing an extreme cold wave of -19 degrees. The wires were frozen to waste, the wind power was frozen and stuck, many components of the thermal power plant were frozen, and the thermal power station was directly paralyzed. Let's talk about daytime. The book mentions that three main types of electricity are used: solar power, wind power, and nuclear power. After talking about nuclear power, wind power and solar power are called garbage power (some small hydropower is also garbage power). Why is it called this? I heard that in detail, the real power grid is not like in the game. When the power generated is too much, it is stored in the battery, and when the power is low, it is taken out to make up for it (in fact, there are power grids and batteries, but it is not in the electricity mode). In real life, the power grid actually generates as much as it uses. If either side of supply and demand is unstable, problems will arise. The supply side is naturally power generation. Solar energy is affected by sunshine and rain, wind energy is affected by wind, and hydropower is affected by water volume. This causes their power generation to be unstable and has a greater impact on the power grid, so In the future, there will be some power plants created for this purpose. They are like firefighters. When there is more garbage electricity, they will generate less electricity. When there is less garbage electricity, they will generate more electricity. Then there will be batteries in the power grid - pumped storage power stations. When there is more electricity, they will use the electricity to pump water up the mountain and store it. When there is less electricity, they will release water to generate electricity. Please don't worry about this Fincher world, because it will shut down when there is no power. The problem in terms of power supply is actually that the sudden reduction in power demand causes the generated electricity to be sent without knowing where to send it, causing the power grid to be overloaded. A specific example is that if people all over the country turn off the lights at the same time, it will cause the power grid to be overloaded (not necessarily, after all, our power grid is still very reliable), so "turning off the lights for one hour" is not environmentally friendly, let alone saving the earth. As I write, I write it as popular science. What I want to express specifically is that it is difficult for many people to survive in the world of "Finch". Specifically, I refer to the moon and Mars. Of course, this refers to their temperatures. Some friends may also ask, Fincher did not show it, because it is either a hard-core science fiction, or a road movie covered in science fiction, focusing on human nature and thinking about life. Just some thoughts after reading it. After all, the author has written a lot.

Each world is similar, with a few chapters on contact, a few chapters on the original plot, a few chapters on "shock", a few chapters on domestic awesomeness, and a few chapters on North American crotch pulling. What's the point of this? There is no "plot" that belongs to the novel itself. It's all a mess, it's really bad

I have abandoned this book for a long time. I accidentally took a look at it today and found that it is finished. I can only say that this book has good material selection and a great beginning, but it is poorly written. The protagonist travels to a game of advanced civilization, masters supreme technology, and travels through various movie worlds to save the people on earth in the end of the world. The spirit of human beings in various movie worlds to actively save themselves and strive for strength in the apocalypse is very infectious to readers. And when written this way, the pattern is also very high. So the beginning attracts a large number of readers. I remember when I first read it, many readers left messages in the comment area, saying that this book was well written, and at least it was a little god. I personally hold the same opinion. However, the author writes more and more crookedly. The main manifestations are that the pace is getting slower and slower, the content is getting more and more watery, the pattern is getting lower and lower, and the plot is getting more and more boring. What everyone wants to see is that mankind is united to resist the doomsday and create a new home. It's not that you're going around in circles. In short, it is a pity that this book was ruined by the author. By the way, let's clear it up, you can still see it from the front. But it ends at Pacific Rim.

What everyone wants to see is human beings uniting to fight disasters, save the world, and save themselves. This is what the title of your book says. But look at what you are writing now? It's a mess of pretense and slaps in the face, a child-level political struggle that's just like playing house but makes people sick to their stomachs. Every chapter is so dull, even if you only write a little bit, it's still full of this kind of stuff. If you don't correct it, I won't subscribe to the next chapter! I think it's not just me, but everyone can't stand it, right?

I would like to ask the author what to do if the opponent turns against you after saving it. After all, the political system of a country with 7 billion people is unpredictable. If you don't add a buff or something, are you sure the opponent can't kill you and then seek development?

I'm gradually losing patience with this book