Prime Minister Bizen

I really disagree with the content of Chapter 93 of the Rishang Volume written by the author. The author has done considerable research on the history of Japan's Warring States Period and Japanese culture, which is reflected in the article. However, the author's understanding of his country's history and culture is quite lacking. First of all, China did import a large number of Japanese knives during the Song and Ming Dynasties, but this does not mean that the knives made in Japan are really superior to our country's local products at the same time. A large number of swords were imported during the Song and Ming Dynasties, mainly because the literati class at that time had a preference for wearing swords. The swords imported from Japan were often gorgeously decorated, and they were deeply loved by the literati and officials. In addition, Japan in ancient times was limited by the lack of foreign military exchanges. Whether it was large armor, belly armor, dongwan, or contemporary foot armor, it lagged behind the mainstream armor culture of the West and East Asia and West Asia at the same time. The larger curve of the Japanese sword brings higher damage to bare armor or armor made of paper. If it was placed on the Chinese battlefield in the Song and Ming Dynasties, it would not be able to eat hot food. Moreover, Japan's local steel smelting technology was quite backward at that time, with high consumption and low output. Imported steel materials accounted for a considerable proportion of the materials used in Japan at that time. At that time, Japan's Tatar steelmaking method was only low-temperature block iron carburization, and it did not even have high-temperature smelting technology. The technical upper limit of its forged steel cannot reach the steel-filling method of the Southern and Northern Dynasties in my country, and the blast furnace smelting technology of the Ming Dynasty and the horse-tooth steel embedding technology of weapons are not mastered by Japan. It's a good thing to like the history and culture of foreign countries and promote them, but please don't trample your own culture.

Be the adopted son of Toyotomi Hideyoshi first. The other adopted sons are all in the Eastern Army in the Battle of Sekigahara. As long as they win, they will all be rebels and are trying to seduce Hideyori. Then Hideyoshi will have only one son.

At this point in the book, the author needs to change his thinking. He feels that he has gone too far. Hideyoshi alone has a strength of more than three million koku, plus the vassal daimyo, the strength is at least 7-8 million koku. Not to mention that after Hideyoshi died, there was no one with enough prestige in the world. Even if Hideyoshi was still there, Hideyoshi would raise a rebellion, Hideyoshi would have to be cowardly. At the conference, he was pointed in the face and scolded by a tens of thousands koku, and was supported by a bunch of daimyo with millions or hundreds of thousands. Is this reasonable?

Although it is not intellectual and very real, it feels like it is overly thoughtful. If Tokugawa Ieyasu was as worried about slander and ridicule as the protagonist, he would definitely not be able to conquer the world. Judging from the ratio of armies and combat power in the article and the contingency of various Chinese and foreign wars in history, it will definitely be possible to retreat in the mid-term. Now I don't look aggrieved, but angry

The protagonist started acting again, completely schizophrenic. Author, do you want the protagonist to be a loyal minister of the Toyotomi family, a good son of the monkey, or do you want him to be a rebel? If it's the former, many of the protagonist's actions are completely seeking death. Do you really think that other characters are NPCs and monkeys don't have their own intelligence agencies? Privately colonizing Ezo, capturing Ryukyu, hiding minerals, marrying Ashikaga, and killing Komikata, there are so many people in charge of it, and it is possible to leak it intentionally or unintentionally, and you will die if a monkey finds out about any of it. Besides, are these really necessary? Monkey will die on his own in less than 10 years. At that time, the protagonist will be in the prime of life. Are you afraid that he will not be able to integrate Kanto? Still have to rely on marrying an Ashikaga concubine that no one takes seriously? The old turtle has shown you the path and you don't know how to learn it. As long as the monkey doesn't find out the protagonist's fault before he dies, who can beat him after the protagonist's current strength? Why take risks and make small moves now.

I have been reading this book for a long time, and now I really can't stand it anymore. The author has fallen into a strange circle. He is afraid of breaking away from the big history, so he forcibly makes the protagonist more difficult. The difficulty makes it depressing without turning it into an explosive and exciting point. The charm of the character has been completely lost. The protagonist has changed from being arrogant at the beginning to being patient and withdrawn. At the beginning, he seemed to be a bit desperate. Now that the author has forced it to make it more difficult to not deviate from the big history, it seems that the protagonist is mentally retarded. It's okay to suppress the protagonist. This is a way of writing, but suppression is to transform into an explosion. The author is suppressing for the sake of suppressing. I wanted to write about characters like Tokugawa Ieyasu and Sima Yi, but I didn't have enough writing power to convey the feeling of a martyr's twilight years and endless ambition. And a large number of historical materials were used on some battles. Of course, this does not mean that it is not good to write a book after carefully studying history. The problem is that we readers come to read a story. What we want to read is a good story, not rigid historical materials. Those battles in the Korean War looked too rigid. The use of a large number of historical materials made me feel like I was reading a history book. Then in terms of strengthening the strength, maybe the author wants to show the wisdom of other people in history, but as soon as he gets next to the protagonist's teammates, a bunch of pig teammates start to hold him back. Maybe the author wants to say that they have their own interests, and it's normal to hold them back, but why didn't your protagonist integrate the forces? The political wisdom of the author's protagonists is sometimes normal, and sometimes appears extremely naive. It feels like the protagonist's personality is split. There is also the problem of the protagonist's harem. Women have no charm in the article. Chapters related to the harem are useless. The protagonist is like a human bulldozer. Otherwise, it is uncomfortable to write a little palace fight (the head of the family has no control over the harem, which makes the protagonist seem very, very stupid). In fact, this point can be grasped and written carefully, giving full play to the charm of the main palace person, and writing a safe haven for a virtuous wife, so that the protagonist can get comfort when he fails, and the reader's depression will be relieved a little, so that people will not give up in anger. Final question, the author's chapter contains too little content! When some chapters are mixed with a large amount of historical materials, there is only one update every day, which makes people feel too watery, which makes people unable to follow the reading. It will be very painful to follow, especially the author, you still write very depressing and less exciting. A following reader will be very unhappy when reading a chapter where you failed to suppress. Even if the reader tolerates it, the next two or three chapters are still depressing, or have just come out of depression. It has been four days, and the reader has been reading for four days. Is it appropriate for you to let the reader depress for four days? Everyone comes here to read a good story. With your writing style, no one can insist on reading it all the time. I always put your book away for a month or two or three weeks before reading it. I still feel depressed when I read it. Isn't it like being in jail if you follow your book? And many of the foreshadowings in the early stage are gone now. I don't know if you still want to fill in the holes. For example, about the young woman from Dayou's family, you yourself were afraid that readers would not be able to read it, so you explained that she was related to the big events later. It was a foreshadowing and she was a poisonous woman. So first of all, we know that this must be a big depressing point. After all, the poisonous woman is still involved in big events. I don't know if you will have to deal with it later. The big depression and the poisonous point are synonymous. But it has nothing to do with me anymore. You were not happy writing this book because you felt that the readers interfered too much; the readers were not happy reading it because the process was depressing and the excitement was too late. I hope you, the author, can learn from the problems of this book in your next book and start a new novel about Japanese history in the future. After all, you are the only author who writes about Japan and is willing to look up a lot of historical materials.

They are about to unify the world, but they are still timid in doing things because they are afraid of that and panic. I watched Tokugawa Ieyasu crush Toyotomi Hideyoshi to ashes and find any excuse to destroy the Toyotomi family. There is nothing to be afraid of, he has already accomplished this, everyone knows Sima Zhao's heart, he still cares about his reputation, he pretends to be a fool, either don't do it, or don't do ink, he doesn't know what to pretend, he is just a clown.

I hope some people can have some brains. If you see that the author of a foreign historical novel has a readership of 500,000, does that mean that you cannot understand everything about foreign countries? , What is the result of seclusion? History has told us. If you have any opinions, please give reasonable refutation instead of abuse.

There is a problem with writing about the Fuso people in this book. If you want to write that the Fuso people are powerful, then they have to invade. According to the technology at that time, there were only Korea and the Ming Dynasty. Japanese pirates were rampant in the Ming Dynasty. After Korea was over, the Ming Dynasty must be attacked. So if you say that the Fuso people invaded the Ming Dynasty, what do you say? You should still write that the Fuso people said they wanted to invade during the Anti-Japanese War. Establishing co-prosperity in Southeast Asia. When talking about attacking the Ming Dynasty, how do you write about Fuso people killing Ming Dynasty people? This is a counter-proposition. If you don't explain to me that the Ming Dynasty people are not Chinese, then I have nothing to say. If you want to write historical novels about other countries, at least not about Asia, this way you won't be written as a traitor.

I still don't understand our Chinese history. Why should I know the history of Japan?

I feel that many times the protagonist clearly has the opportunity to influence history, but chooses to follow the trend of history. He knows that Hideyoshi cannot tolerate a second Maori, but he still acts as Hideyoshi's good son, and even gives his mother a younger brother. I will mention a few possibilities for your reference. 1. After the incident at Honnoji Temple, the protagonist got the news first from Hideyoshi. What would happen if Ukita defected to Mori at this time, or revealed the news to Mori? Hideyoshi's army would be flanked from both sides or pursued, and a major return would be impossible. Isn't Hideyoshi's original territory within his grasp? The general trend of the world will also return to chaos. 2. In the battle of Shiyue, what if the protagonist helps Shibata? Now that we know the details of the battle, Hideyoshi will win miserably, so I give Shibata a thumbs up. Shibata is more powerful than Hideyoshi. If he wins the protagonist, he will have a wider space. There is also a reason for dissatisfaction with Hideyoshi's carving up of Oda. When the time comes, justice will come to Shibata. If Hideyoshi doesn't directly play gg, he won't be able to win the world. Ukita can also expand along the way. 3. Komakiyama has a long hand, Hideyoshi lost both games and used hard power to kill Ieyasu, but it is different if there is a protagonist, but at this time there are many fewer choices, and the benefits of helping Hideyoshi are greater. But there are actually options to help Ieyasu. In other words, the protagonist still follows the original path from beginning to end, not daring to go against the trend of history and lose the advantage of a prophet. Doesn't tmd know that Hideyoshi will attack North Korea if he continues to comply? And these choices aren't that bad, right? Even after penicillin came out, the Nao family would still be dead. If the Ukita Nao family had not died, all the things I mentioned above would have been possible. There is really no need to write it like it is now. An intelligent article does not mean a good article, but it does not mean an abusive article. The important thing is rationality! What you wrote, the author, is actually unreasonable for time-travelers who want to maximize their profits.

It gives me a feeling that it was Yuan Shao who had a global vision and conquered the world.

I've been speechless lately. What are you writing about? How long can Narita's ink last? Your writing is so rude. The patriarch of a family was yelling at the 1 million stone daimyo in the local main formation. These retainers didn't go up to chop him down. There were many wealthy families in Kanto. If they didn't take the opportunity to clean up the land, how were they going to arrange their own samurai? Water also needs to be logical, right?

In fact, if the Ming Dynasty is allowed to continue, China will only get worse... The Qing Dynasty is much better than the Ming Dynasty in Laqua.

I saw the eve of the battle of Komaki Nagakute. I can't stand it anymore. Although subjectivity is bound to happen in any novel, this one is really about one's own side being supreme and the enemy being as stupid as a pig. Let me give a few examples: 1. The character of Maeda Toshiie, a good gentleman in history, because he betrayed Shibata Katsuie in this book, he has a 25-year-old character. It feels like it was only designed to elevate Shibata Katsuie who should not be elevated. 2. I really don't know what Toyotomi Hideyoshi's position is in this book. Is it the Ming Lord? Is it stupidity? Both are and are not. While talking about Hideyoshi's world, he also uses a few words to belittle Hideyoshi's personality (mostly lecherous). You can kneel down and lick him completely, just for fun... 3. What is the position of the protagonist? It's acceptable to start the battle at the age of 8, to be a general general at around 10 years old, and to be a famous general at the age of 12, but it's disgusting if your famous general is so cute. If you are 12 years old, you are an adult. Who treats you as a child? 4. What I don't understand the most is the Japanese samurai riding and shooting above the Mongols. I don't refute that maybe some people are indeed better at Mongolians, but I won't say that Zhang Fei's equestrian skills are better than those of Mongolians, so Chinese people's riding skills are better than Mongolians 5. This book is not smooth enough for me, and I feel that many places are illogical. Today you know how to do 1000 stones in the east, in two months you can go to the south with 1200, in three months you can cross the sea with 1500, and after peace, you can come back with 2000... Really knowing and doing is like playing. There is still a lot of historical "foreshadowing" and a lot of subjective consciousness added 6. The shortcomings are almost there, I'll go ahead, you don't need to send them. Finally, I would like to thank the author. After all, creation is not easy, and I hope I can write better works in the future

It feels like the protagonist is Hideyoshi, who has sex with Hideyoshi's mother, and he seems to be interested in Hideyoshi rather than just throwing it aside. As for the rewards, there are basically no rewards. Hideyoshi is Hideyoshi's number one horse boy. There is basically no reward. If so, why not use Toyotomi Hideyoshi as the protagonist? Can the defeated Ieyasu retain such a large territory, while the Hide family can only retain the bottom line of 750,000 koku?

I don't know what will happen next. Both the protagonist's role as a shogun and Guan Bai are feasible. The difference is that to be a shogun, the Toyotomi clan must be extended, while to be a general, the Ukita clan must be restored. Ukita comes from the Sasaki tributary, and Sasaki comes from the Minamoto clan. I remember reading a blogger on Station B who said that the reason for the demise of the Taira clan was that he was close to the public officials and away from the samurai family. I prefer the protagonist to use the Ukita clan to establish his own shogunate, rather than the monkey Toyotomi clan.

The protagonist is really good at licking. I am afraid that the protagonist is not that monkey, but he is also a millionaire. He is not as good at licking as a turtle, so he thought he was a retainer.

Hideyoshi: It's great that you came to see mom off!

Regarding the theme of Japan's Warring States Period, this one is number one.

For a super famous man with millions of stones, he can even open a mansion directly in Kanto! Although I don't like the old turtle, I must have cut him too hard, less than a million stones! If you really just want to be the prime minister, you shouldn't expand your power by hundreds of thousands of stones at every turn. If you want to replace him, you can do it now! I rubbed it over and over again, it was so boring to watch...

Why is the comment area so quiet? It seems like there has been no reply for a long time.

I think there are the following points. First, when Nobunaga died, Hideie was 9-10 years old and seemed unable to do anything. Then it's still the historical route. Let's see how the monkey defeats the turtle in Komaki's hands, weakens the turtle, and lets the monkey reward some territory. Prepare for the future. Second, the Korean War does not need to be written in detail, but is briefly discussed, focusing on describing the male protagonist's ability to survive. Third, Motoji Goto of the Kuroda family will leave. At this time, the male protagonist will be able to take charge of the family independently and can be recruited. Fourth, the plot arrangement after the monkey's death requires a new concept and design by the author.

Good guy, the God of War Tokugawa Ieyasu directly made the opposing general become one of his own

I'm going to buy another one. I can't get enough of the Japanese War.

Will the God of Cookery, God of Home, and God of War appear?

The next book will be about Kantō, conquering the upper ones and then unifying Kantō.

Suddenly I realized that it was actually over

Kobayakawa had actually rebelled long ago.

How long do you want to write this 😰