From the Start, Li Shimin Put the Entire City on a Manhunt for Me

Are there any people in the comments section who are criticizing Yang Guang and Wu Zetian? Have you read any history books? One killed tens of millions of people, and the other lost half of the Tang Dynasty. What else can you brag about?

I saw many people criticizing Wu Zetian. It is true that Wu Zetian lost territory, but this is full of the inevitability of ascending to the throne as the first female emperor. Wu Zetian refused to accept anyone from the top to the bottom, and would definitely pull out the one who danced the most happily to kill the chickens and scare the monkeys, so it was not good for the generals to fight, and then after the top people were killed, they had to replace them with the people below, so they gained a reputation for being a virtuous person. In the middle and late period of Wu Zetian's reign in the Tang Dynasty, just like now, the problem of gender opposition between men and women emerged, and Wu Zetian focused almost all his energy on dealing with it. Of course, I am not trying to say good things about Wu Zetian, but I think the reasons should be considered when analyzing the problem. In fact, I personally think that Wu Zetian's achievements were based on the foundation of predecessors and certain coincidences. The imperial examination was founded by Yang Guang with the purpose of breaking the clan monopoly; the appointment of talents was because the old people were disobedient to him and killed and re-elected officials; he believed in Buddhism and respected Buddhism, which led to cultural development. I think the reason why Wu Zetian is praised by some people as a generation of sage is simply because she is a wise king. It is as simple as that. She is not very enlightened, nor is she stupid. She kills ministers just to stabilize her throne, and others rely on her first position to support her. In short, when analyzing historical issues, we should analyze them based on the facts at that time and abandon existing concepts, which is the so-called sense of substitution. In Yang Guang's words, what should I say, what he did was to pave the way for future generations, but he himself collapsed. He built canals, opened trade, and developed the southern economy; he opened imperial examinations to break the clan monopoly, so much so that Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty said: All the heroes in the world are among our own. Of course, we can't abandon the weird things Yang Guang did. In short, I feel that Yang Guang and Wu Zetian are actually like that. Wu Zetian can be said to be pushed by the situation; Yang Guang is purely a fatuous wise king. Many people scolded Yang Guang for killing tens of millions of people. It was mentioned on the canal that he conquered Goguryeo three times. If we carefully analyze the reasons behind it, we can find that by the Sui Dynasty, Goguryeo had become a big country in the Northeast with a vast territory and was the second largest country in Asia. As our vassal state, Goguryeo should have paid tribute to us and obeyed our orders, but Goguryeo continued to expand its territory and seriously threatened the rule of the Central Plains. The establishment of the Sui Dynasty and the war were supported by the noble clans, but the harm of the noble clans to the country can be seen from the weakening of the clan in later generations, so Yang Guang decided to send the government troops of the noble clans to attack Goguryeo. He originally thought that this would not only weaken the power of the clans but also solve foreign troubles. As a result, all three expeditions failed. Goguryeo has been a vassal state granted by the Central Plains since the Han Dynasty. During the Sui Dynasty, it took the initiative to accept the title of Tibet from the Sui Dynasty, but it also communicated with Chen State. Goguryeo united many ethnic minorities around the Sui Dynasty. As long as the Sui Dynasty was in internal turmoil, it could attack from all sides, seriously affecting the Sui Dynasty's economic recovery. Goguryeo encroached on the northeastern border of the Sui Dynasty, disobeyed the Sui Dynasty's orders, and invaded Baekje. Say so much, the Sui Dynasty's three expeditions to Goguryeo were politically correct, but they abandoned the interests of the people. Another factor that killed tens of millions of people was the suppression of rebellions. This is not to mention that emperors of all dynasties would do this.

The author really needs to have a good understanding of history before writing a book. Many of the things he writes feel like they are echoing what others have said, just like folk tales. Don't lick Li Shimin. Is it possible that he can still compare with people like Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty, Gaozu of the Tang Dynasty, and Wu Zetian?

Can't you tell whether the book is good or bad just by looking at the comma in the title?

Needless to say, kneel down and lick Li Shimin's

It is recommended that the heroine Hong Xiu. Many people in Changle wrote that it was too boring. I want to see something different

The whole article is full of dialogue, which makes it uncomfortable to read

Have some authors recently jumped to the starting point collectively? . . . .

Can you use all the hard work you can do to write an old book?

I'll update it soon before all my members expire.