The Tang Dynasty Was Stunned by Li Shimin from the Start

After reading these recent chapters, especially today's chapter, I can't help but want to play devil's advocate. Can the social environment of the Tang Dynasty support the development of banks and the issuance of banknotes with land as the anchor? Did the people of the Tang Dynasty have sufficient economic and financial awareness? I don't think we'll even get to the point of issuing banknotes. Once there's too much money in the bank, it will be drained out immediately. For public purposes, the court needs money, so use it first. For personal gain, they may even blatantly move it to their own home or use it to pay bribes. There won't even be a run, the emptying speed is too fast. Even if the author forces it to start, who can do it? A financier from the Tang Dynasty? How many of them can't be found in the entire Tang Dynasty?! Not to mention any anchors, does the feudal bureaucracy care about you? If the level of social development has not reached that level, don't force it. If you teach calculus to primary school students, they may still be willing to listen, but if you teach Hegel to an 80-year-old illiterate old lady, no matter how good you are, they won't listen!

I even think it is appropriate for Cheng Ying, the adopted daughter of the Cheng family, to be a doctor. The main character is a coward, and now several of the harem reserves are young ladies. There needs to be a lady who can clean the streets to stay in the place.

There are still people criticizing Emperor Li Shiming's status? You have to understand that Li Shiming can be in the top three no matter what. You can accuse him of not being a good father, liking wives, killing his brothers and imprisoning his father, and having character problems, but he is indeed a good emperor.

Writing a poem and pretending to be a slap in the face is too bad. When others question it, the protagonist immediately jumps out to write a poem and pretends to be a slap in the face to gain fame. In my opinion, it is like if a man is beautiful and I question whether he is a man, I either take off his pants and take out his dick, or directly admit that I am not a man, and then others take out their dicks and I compare. This kind of plot is disgusting. Either don't write it, and write it to let the doubters pay how much it is cost-effective to compare.

I read that there are many people correcting the author's mistakes in the book, which is outrageous!! First of all, it's not that you are confused about where you read the reference for correcting your error: history, biography or TV drama adaptation. The point is that this is an entertainment literary work - a novel!!! Still a cool article! This is not a rigorous academic paper! Why don't you change the author after you correct him?!! Change what? Turn over the information and change it into historical records? Is it necessary to be realistic when reading novels? It's not that you can't stand it anymore. If you really can't stand it, just change it. Don't jump out to find a sense of existence. I think it's okay anyway. I'm a bookworm for many years, so I'd better add some poison resistance! Summary: From what I have seen so far, the content of this book is okay, and the development is not bad. In this chapter, a bunch of people who have read history jumped out to ask the author to write a book, which makes people speechless. As for that, I went back to read the book.

I was almost scared off by the title of the book, but after reading it now, I feel good. The scenes are well grasped, and the dual characters are even more interesting. The most important thing is that it is relaxed and freehand. The story develops naturally, the plot is smooth, and it has the skills of a veteran. I hope the author will continue to work hard and write the next story well!

I read a big book, and although I know a lot of it is inconsistent with known history, I know it is a novel.

Don't worry about the history of the actions, because we cannot verify a lot of history. Most of them don't know what the background of history is. The history we basically know is to watch TV series and look at the historical records of the actions. But right or wrong, true or false, are all decided by the experts. But for how many periods of history, experts can be sure that their judgment is accurate. It is nothing more than a little bit of speculation based on some few records and some objects. So we can just look at the funny points and don't have to worry about the historical accuracy. It's not necessary. As the saying goes, if you hear something, don't criticize it, and if you criticize something, don't hear it.

It's really good, mainly because it doesn't seem to have any big problems. I read more than 20 chapters and finished reading it... It's a relaxing article and it's easy to finish reading it.

What the hell? Is Sanjiang poisoned? The heroines of the three recommended books in one issue are all Princess Changle? There are two books that have almost the same introduction. I immediately vomited, what the hell is that?