Xinshun 1730

This book is very embarrassing. At the top, there are various works on history and sociology, which are pure dry information, pure theory, and have academic reference value; at the bottom, there are various interesting articles about traveling through history, from the Qin Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty. They are purely to entertain readers, and they know that they have no theoretical basis and no ability to make logical deductions. But "Xinshun 1730" is a book that he can't get up and down. He feels that other pure Shuangwen is not worthy of playing with him. Shuangwen is the most brainless. But he wants to compare with the above works, but he can't get up. He has no choice but to get stuck here. He wanted to develop a whole set of theories but he couldn't do it, so he thought it was not worthwhile to write it as a pure article. I managed to get out of the mud without getting infected, so why do I still fall in? The result is that we are stuck in this position where we cannot move up or down.

Generally speaking, it is extremely toxic for one reason: there is so much nonsense that it is so ridiculous that reading this book is a waste of time. If it can be shortened to 500 chapters, it will be a good article, and if it can be reduced to 300 chapters, it will be a divine article. But now readers are equivalent to reading a sacred article and reading a lot of garbage, and they have to dig for gold in their own history. Although there is real gold, there is so much history. It really fits that sentence - it may not be wild enough, but it must be historical enough.

Transportation Post Bar

The author spent a whole book talking about one thing. If the Hongwu-style finance, which had been reversed for 500 years, was not abolished, it would be impossible for the Ming Dynasty to spontaneously industrialize. The sprouts would remain sprouts for a lifetime, and there would be no possibility of germination. Under the Hongwu type of finance, the land interest rate in the Ming and Qing dynasties was 15-25%. Generally higher than the average industrial profit by 2-8%. Compared with land annexation, investing in industry is unprofitable, which greatly curbs the possibility of private capital flowing into industry and being fixed as industrial capital. The definition of land interest rate Land interest rate = land rent/land price. Normal land rent and land interest rate in the Ming Dynasty It can be derived from Zheng Zhizhang's "Comparative Study of Chinese and British Land Rent from the 14th to the 19th Century" and Li Wenzhi's "On the Marks of Division in the Late Feudal Society of China - The Loosening of Feudal Land Relations in the Ming and Qing Dynasties". During the Ming and Qing Dynasties, the normal land rent was 50%. 20% Field bone and 30% Wadapi. The farmers' seeds are borne by the tenants by default, and they have to lend extra to the tenants. Under the Hongwu-style finance of the Ming Dynasty, the positive land tax was 3.3%, And the land interest rate in the Jiangnan area of ​​the Ming Dynasty was 12% The land interest rate was affected by factors such as logistics conditions. So southern Jiangsu is lower. In the more inland and mountainous areas such as Anhui and Fujian, it can reach 15 or even 20% At the same time, policies will also affect the land interest rate. In Chongzhen and Yongzheng, the gentry paid the grain as a whole, lowering the land interest rate to 6% and 4% respectively The relationship between regular taxes and farmers' land rent In the feudal dynasty, the court, bureaucrats, and subordinate landowners would continue to erode the income of the people to a level where they could barely survive. This level will fluctuate up and down due to some occasional bureaucratic reforms, but it will always remain near the kill line. The core logic is that rational people will maximize interests while preventing you from overturning the table But natural disasters and foreign enemies will break this fragile balance. ----------A piece of firewood The official land tax in the Ming Dynasty was 3.3%, And the official tax in the Qing Dynasty was 4%, so the landlord's land rent was about 50% In the UK, the tax on 1 pound was 4 shillings, and a 20% land tax was implemented, and the landlord's land rent was 33.3% What can be done to achieve industrialization 1. Completely abolish the backward Hongwu-style finance, share the grain into the land, and pay the grain to the gentry as one. Do not want low taxes, but a high tax of at least 10% 2. State capitalism, high taxes, and fiscal dominance in industrial investment.

This book is a rare fictional historical deduction novel. The author brought me the feeling closest to reality under limited circumstances. But I wouldn't say this is a good novel, the impression is still a bit poor. This novel has a lot of discussion space and a lot of useful information in it, but the author's writing style is average, and he always likes to talk things over and over again. My personal feeling is that it is too long to say the least. Only updating two chapters in one day is too torturous. Honestly, I will continue to follow it because of its great deductions, but I probably don't want to spend money to read it at Qidian, Student Party; and the main reason I spend money to read books at Qidian is to read chapters, but there are quite few chapters. The author is probably not short of money and wrote this book with love, and he doesn't seem to care much about the readers' opinions. . . . .

This book is very fair, refreshing and reasonable. For people like me who like more rigorous historical deductions, this book is quite suitable. The author has a solid historical background. To exaggerate, he can be said to be "a person who has some real understanding of how the real world works." However - I know that theoretical deductions and background explanations are the characteristics of this book, which can help readers understand the contents of the book and must be savored. However, in my personal opinion, the relative length of the theory and explanation parts is too much, and the plot advances a bit slowly. Take the six chapters of "The Dutch Disaster Year" as an example, the theory and explanation parts account for more than half of the length. The author's writing style when writing the theory and explanation parts is sometimes "talking in a long and eloquent way", and sometimes he talks over and over again, which is really a bit verbose. I only updated two chapters in one day, which is a bit boring and tiring (ಥ_ಥ). For me, if the author can improve his writing skills, shorten the text in the theory and conclusion, and refine the content, while maintaining rigor and transparency, he can grasp the rhythm, speed up the plot appropriately, and even appropriately increase the density of reasonable and exciting points, then this book will probably be improved to a higher level.

It is suggested that the author delete or simplify a large section of the text about the historical differences between the East and the West. After all, this is a novel, not a study of history. Moreover, these knowledge are all in the past tense and are things that have been swept into the garbage dump by history. Readers will find it novel if you mention a few sentences. If you directly copy a large section, it will be very uncomfortable to read. Many book friends said that this is the reason why they are too tired to read. Anyway, go for it and write well.

Witness the Spring River Flowers and Moonlight Night in the article

After reading dozens of chapters, I couldn't help but make a post. The author's writing style is okay, but he just can't understand the key points. It's a novel that makes up history, and you have to throw away some knowledge when writing it, which makes the content very procrastinating. What you are writing is a novel, not an essay. You must capture the reader's heart.

First, the relevant historical figures who are compared with Liu Ni in the official plot of the original work: Huo Qubing, Cao Cao, Zheng He, Nian Gengyao, Napoleon, and Yuan Shikai. (Supplements are welcome if not all are included) Then there are the historical figures that I compare with in various pseudo-histories of black and Liu rebellion that I have compiled in an unsystematic manner: Xia Yu, Gou Jian, Shang Yang, Shen Buhai, Bai Qi, Liu Bang, Xiang Yu , Caesar, Wang Mang, Dong Zhuo, Yuan Shao, Lu Bu, Cao Cao, Liu Bei, Cao Pi, Sima Yi, Zhong Hui, Liu Yu, Tan Daoji, Li Mi, Liu Heitai, Li Linfu (this should be highlighted), An Lushan (this should also be highlighted), Wang Anshi, Yue Fei, Cromwell, Yongzheng, Nian Gengyao. It seems that Hei Liu Ni Hei has too many character attributes, which is a bit confusing.

If I can't write anything to advance the plot, I just go to an electronics factory to screw in screws. The last few dozen pictures are all crap. Are you finished talking about Che Lulu?

Does anyone still remember a chapter where the last old man who met Emperor Taizong died in the capital? Which chapter is this? 🌹🌹🌹

I always feel that my steps are still a bit big.

Keyzhengliu's novel is a good novel, but I suggest you don't spend money to read it I guess the author doesn't care about the money and writes it for fun By the end of the writing, the author has been too lazy to "organically combine" the information with the plot. Long paragraphs of exposition are reversed, and it takes a long time to wait for a little plot advancement. It is too boring. I came to read the novel, not the thesis. This book is also relatively unpopular. Usually there are only a few chapters and paragraphs, so it is not worth spending money on.

This is what I tell people who have never watched it. There are plot characters in the early stage. If you click on a chapter in the middle and late stages, there will be no characters and no plot. Just watch him write some nasty tricks in a long-winded way. I skipped directly to the end. The main character is dead and he is still blabbering. I see you are writing a paper, right? The author alone is so excited. I read a book review that was very good: This is not a novel at all!

Does any book friend recommend a book that introduces the development of Confucianism in history? In the novel, there is a mixture of truth and falsehood. I want to figure it out.

The general's three arrows anchored the Tianshan Mountains, and the warrior's long song entered the Hanguan Pass.

I think the problem with this book is that it didn't combine the theories with the plot well in the later period. Often, a few hundred words or even a thousand words of theory will suddenly appear in the plot, and then the plot will continue.

It will be updated soon after it is put on the shelves, so I will automatically subscribe.

🤓Good looking

The more I read the author's book, the more chilled I became. I used to think that China's missing out on the Age of Discovery was just a historical accident, but now I realize that it is a historical necessity. The problem in China during the Enlightenment was not a question of whether to ban sea trade, but a systemic problem from top to bottom, from land to canals, which would be difficult to solve without a violent revolution. The protagonist in the book also relies on his prophetic ability and noble status to barely maintain the current situation. This dilemma simply suffocates everyone who sees the truth clearly. After reading the author's novel, I can't stand other Mingchuan novels anymore. Just by talking, the navy came, taxes were collected, maritime trade prospered, and Southeast Asia was colonized. It's simply outrageous.

I feel that the author wanted to express this by writing this book: Even if China changes to a Han regime, it will still not be able to develop an industrial revolution and modern technology. In the 19th century, one crow and two crows would also happen, and Japan would rise. I also agree with this. If you are not really hurt, you will not have the motivation to find a way to become rich and powerful. Although Liu Ni changed history on his own in the novel, readers all felt how great the resistance was and how difficult it all was. It took twenty years and a very high starting point to create a budding commercial bourgeoisie, but it is still far from achieving the goal. Another point is that when the author wrote about the chief, he wanted to carry out a proletarian revolution. After being 404, he felt that he had compromised now and would probably end up with a bourgeois revolution.

I won't judge whether it destroys the foundation or not, but I have been paying more attention to the history of technology for a long time. In the history of technology, the Qing Dynasty is a very embarrassing existence. How to say embarrassing? Because when it comes to the history of technology, there is either nothing to say about the Manchu and Qing Dynasties, or it is simply "Ming and Qing mixed together" to let the Qing Dynasty get the glory of the Ming Dynasty, or it is the Ming Dynasty to the early Qing Dynasty, and we will not talk about it later. Because ever since the wheel of history rolled to the Manchu and Qing Dynasties, the history of technology in ancient China has been stuck. It cannot be said that there was no technological development in the Qing Dynasty, but it was really lackluster. Most of them were just improvements in the technology of the previous Ming Dynasty, but there were not many that could be talked about (boasted). Going forward, we can only write about Western technology... Give a few examples He Tangkun's "History of Ancient Chinese Handicraft Engineering Technology" Look at the titles of each dynasty in it: The booming development of handicraft technology in Qin and Han Dynasties Slow development of handicraft technology in Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties Sui, Tang and Five Dynasties The development of handicraft technology The prosperity of handicraft technology in the Southern Song Dynasty The difficult development of handicraft technology in the Yuan Dynasty The integrated handicraft technology of the Ming Dynasty The slow development of handicraft technology in the early and mid-Qing Dynasty ... It is not written after the Qing Dynasty. Please read these wordings carefully! Due to frequent wars in the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, the word "Slow" was used. In the Yuan Dynasty, the Mongols were not good at technology and it was "Difficult". In the Qing Dynasty, it was written that in the early and middle periods, "Slow" was used. Comparing the prosperity of the two Song Dynasties, the Qin and Han Dynasties were "prosperous", while the Ming Dynasty was "gathered"... Read carefully. Wang Zhaochun's "History of Ancient Chinese Military Technology and Engineering" (Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing Dynasties) does not have so much rhetoric, and only writes about the early Qing Dynasty... I won't mention it later. Thinking about the military aspect, there is really nothing to mention. Even in the First Crow (Harmony) War, the Manchu and Qing Dynasties still relied on the military technology of the Ming Dynasty to fight against the foreigners. How can one write about this? There is only one place in the entire book's table of contents where there is rhetoric, "Twists and turns". This is a legacy of the Ming Dynasty in the early period, and people did not write about it at all in the middle period. Later modernized. He Tangkun's "History of Metal Smelting and Processing Engineering Technology in Ancient China" also only covers the early Qing Dynasty. Most of the content of the rhetoric of "Collection" comes from the Ming Dynasty. Others include the mechanical volume of "History of Science and Technology in China". This book is not classified by dynasty but is written according to different mechanical types. However, each category basically ends with Song Yingxing and Xu Guangqi. The Qing Dynasty... Not to mention, there is some involvement. Foreign priests passed on clocks and the Qing Dynasty successfully imitated them. I won't list them all. If you are interested in studying the history of technology, you can read the book. After reading it, go back and carefully appreciate what the Qing Dynasty brought to China. In terms of technological development in ancient China, it basically came to an abrupt halt by the end of the Ming Dynasty. Relying on the huge inertia of the wheel of history, it could barely benefit the early Qing Dynasty (as of Kangxi), and then this wheel came to a standstill. Wait until the Western ships and artillery force smash the Manchu gate. The Qing Dynasty created a gap of one to two hundred years in one fell swoop The picture below is also from Wang Zhaochun's book. Some cleaning fans have to read all the other people's books...

Damn it, finding a good book to read these days is like looking for a needle in a haystack. Brother, write carefully. I'll steal batteries to support you.

Qing fans' highest evaluation of the Qing Dynasty: the most powerful feudal dynasty, the pinnacle of the ancient feudal dynasty. Ironically, modern history begins with the Age of Discovery in the West. High-end players have begun to update the version, and the Qing Dynasty still said "my old version is the best in the world"!

Since Dashun inherited the Ming Dynasty, it must be technically superior to the Ming Dynasty. However, the book always feels like an alternative Qing Dynasty. This is a contradiction in the setting of the book. After all, the technology of the Qing Dynasty was more than a little inferior to that of the Ming Dynasty. Because the Qing Dynasty had fewer people, it had to implement a policy of cultural repression to ensure its dominance. Therefore, it banned and destroyed the military books of the previous dynasty on a large scale, which led to a serious technological regression (the Qing army was still using the bowl-mouth cannons that appeared in the early Ming Dynasty that had been eliminated by the Ming army two hundred years ago). The private manufacture of cannons by provincial armies other than the Eight Banners was strictly prohibited. But why is Dashun lagging behind in technology and lacking in artillery? As for the technical level of the ships, it is not yet known, but during the Ming Dynasty, the size of the ships alone was not inferior to the first-class Western battleships of the same period (in 1533, the Ming Dynasty sent a nearly 60-meter-long sealing boat to seal Ryukyu, and in 1633, the Ming Dynasty sent a nearly 70-meter-long sealing boat, and by 171 The Fengzhou sent by the Qing Dynasty in 1899 was only thirty meters long, and by 1800 it had shrunk to twenty meters! ), So Dashun inherited from the Ming Dynasty, and did not have the Qing Dynasty's abnormal policy of banning books and deleting books to control the size of shipbuilding and the number of cannons, so naturally it should not be used as a reference for the technology of the Qing Dynasty. Moreover, there was a breakthrough period in the development of Chinese artillery in the late Ming Dynasty. Since the Qing Dynasty did not appear, this golden period that was originally interrupted should be able to continue. At least the artillery manufacturing technology will not lag too far behind the West in the same period. Moreover, Dashun should vigorously develop the car camp technology. This is the main weapon for the Ming Dynasty to compete with the northern forces for land. Why haven't I heard the author mention it? I also want to see the author write about the chariot unit, and see the "ancient Chinese tanks" showing off their power 😏 The author should mainly study Western history, it feels like there are a lot of Westernized things. To be honest, there is not much difference in technology between the East and the West in the 16th and 17th centuries, they just have different emphasis. The development of Chinese-style firearms pursues lightness and the ability to carry out high-density firepower in field battles, while the West pursues range and power. The French cannon and matchlock gun were also manufactured in China in the early to mid-16th century. The wheel cannons and electric cannons developed as a result highlighted this Chinese tradition. And after two centuries, it feels like Dashun has regressed in technology like the Qing Dynasty? Isn't there already a time traveler in front of me? Of course, the book written by the author is also very good. It can be clearly seen from the article that the author has put in a lot of hard work. As a newcomer, it can be said that it is very good to be able to write at this level. I hope the author will continue to maintain it!

😭Come back and see Shu Xihe😭 🌟My most proud belief🌟 ⚡Xinshun is still fresh in my mind⚡ 😭Tears are flowing inexplicably😭 💥Vaguely remember the careerist💥 👍and the awesome chief👍 ⚡Kill off all the procrastination⚡ ✨It's not tiring to read another book✨

Academician Xi Zezong: The "Kangxi Prosperity" was the beginning of the decline of science in China ——Conversation with Academician Xi Zezong Author: Former President Fang of the University of Science and Technology of China Source of the article: "Zhengming" magazine Old friend Academician Xi Zezong is in sight. It was possible to meet him in Berlin this year because the MG11 conference invited him to give a report on the Millennium Review of Supernova 1006. Brother Zezong has been famous in academic circles for half a century for his "New Table of Ancient Supernovae" (1955). The following is a record of multiple phone calls over a three-month period, from August to November 2006. Omitting comments about current events and past events, I will only record Professor Xi's fine remarks on the history of science, especially the history of Chinese science. F: I read your article about Kangxi, and your conclusion is that Chinese science did not really begin to decline until the Kangxi dynasty in the early Qing Dynasty. X: Yes. F:Among the Qing emperors, Kangxi seemed to be the most fond of natural science. He asked missionaries to teach him Western science. He has considerable knowledge of arithmetic and astronomy. You say he is "stifling the people's wisdom." What is the basis for this? X: The theory that Kangxi "stifled the people's wisdom" was first proposed by Liang Qichao and later demonstrated by Shao Lizi. Indeed, Kangxi studied arithmetic and astronomy. However,his purpose is not to advocate science, but on the contrary, to block the spread and development of modern science among the Han nation. One of the evidences is his purpose of inviting missionaries. In the late Ming Dynasty, scholar-bureaucrats and scholars could communicate spontaneously with Western missionaries, but Emperors Wanli and Chongzhen basically ignored them. According to the diary of missionary J. F. Gerbillon,Kangxi did not allow missionaries to translate any scientific documents in yamen where there were Han and Mongolian people. Since the 150th year of Kangxi's reign, the Qintian Prison of the Qing Dynasty has always been served by missionaries from the West as the chief or deputy supervisors, and there have never been Han or Mongolians. Kangxi asked missionaries to supervise the Qintian Prison. The purpose was not to open up Sino-Western exchanges, but on the contrary, to "stifle" Sino-Western scientific and technological exchanges. F: As far as I know, during the Kangxi era, there was the Royal Society in London, the Royal Academy of Sciences in Paris, and the Academy of Sciences in Berlin. They were a major boost to the scientific development of Europe. X: Yes. Kangxi lived in the same era as King Louis XIV of France and Peter the Great of Russia. Missionaries also introduced to Kangxi the "Académie? Des Sciences" and the "Observatoire de Paris" founded by Louis XIV. F: The establishment of the Academy of Sciences seemed to be a fashion among the emperors of that era. It is said that Kangxi also published his mathematical papers when he was in the imperial court. Did Kangxi also intend to establish the Qing Academy of Sciences? X: The Kangxi mathematical paper you are referring to may be "Theory of Imperial Triangle Deduction". However, there is no record that Kangxi was interested in establishing the Academy of Sciences. Louis XIV visited his "Academy of Science and Technology" but did not publish any papers. The purpose of his establishment of the Institute of Science and Technology was to promote the French scientific research spirit and cultivate talents. Kangxi's policy was to consolidate the "imperial system" and curb the scientific research spirit of the Han nation. In the early Qing Dynasty, there were also non-"imperial" talents who were proficient in mathematics and astronomy such as "Nan Wang (Xi Chan) and Bei Xue (Feng Zuo)". That is the remnant of Ming Dynasty academia. Later, it disappeared completely. F: There is no talent. There seems to be no "examination device". If you have visited the ancient observatory in Beijing and the collection of ancient astronomical instruments in Nanjing. You will find that the observatory of the Qing Dynasty did not even have an astronomical telescope. The astronomers of the Qing Dynasty didn't even know how to build a telescope? X: Of course I know. Xu Guangqi suggested building an astronomical telescope in 1629, twenty years after Galileo's astronomical telescope, which was very fast. Kangxi also knew about telescopes. There are hundreds of telescopes in the Forbidden City in Beijing, most of which were collected during the "prosperity" of Kangxi and Qianlong. However, Kangxi guarded against the spread of telescopes. Kangxi ordered the missionaries not to make telescopes. The telescope can only be used by the royal family, so there is no telescope on the observatory. There were many more astronomical instruments in the Qing palace than on the astronomical observatory. The entire star catalog published by the Qing Dynasty was based on actual measurement data without telescopes. Can we still fall behind? Kangxi was afraid that once the instruments were taken out of the palace, Han people would copy and improve them, and the Manchu ruling group would no longer have a monopoly. F: Is there any other evidence of monopoly? X: Algebra. Unlike arithmetic, algebra relies on a set of symbols. Symbols are the language of algebra. In 1712, the Jesuit Fu Shengze wrote "A New Method of Algebra (Algebra)" to introduce symbolic algebra to Kangxi. Kangxi couldn't understand it and said this new law was "ridiculous". He ordered that the new method of algebra should not be disseminated. Therefore, it was not until 1859 that the algebraic notation method began to spread in China. That was already 150 years later, and it was no longer a new method. F: The term "ridiculous" is a typical psychological manifestation of pretending to understand something. This is not surprising. In early 1949, in Beijing, when I was in my third year of junior high school, I was asked to teach junior high school algebra to a cultural cram school (there were many cultural cram schools at that time). When I used symbols to talk about a=-(-a), the older people in the class didn't understand it, but the younger ones accepted it easily. In 1712, Kangxi was already 58 years old, and it was understandable that he could not understand algebraic notation. However, I remember that Kangxi also liked to say that others did not understand science. X: In 1689, Kangxi wanted to tease (belittle) Minister Li Guangdi in Nanjing. Kangxi asked the Jesuits in advance how many degrees Canopus rose from the horizon. After seeing Li Guangdi coming to court, Kangxi asked him: "Can you recognize Canopus?" Li Guangdi couldn't answer. Kangxi was proud: "Of course Canopus cannot be seen in Beijing, but it can be seen in Nanjing. When you arrive in your hometown of Minguang, you can even see the Antarctic Star." Kangxi was so proud that he couldn't see the Antarctic Star in Minguang. Liang Rengong (Liang Qichao) said that Kangxi's science was a tool used to attack others (Li Guangdi was subsequently demoted), which was true. F: From algebraic symbols to the South Pole Star, it proves that Kangxi also had limited knowledge of modern science. Is it related to missionaries? X: It's relevant. Kangxi only learned Western science from missionaries and did not really open the door to academic exchanges between China and the West. There were no technical difficulties in communication between China and the West at that time. Water transportation between Asia and Europe has been very developed. As mentioned earlier, Western scientific literature could be sent to China in a timely manner during the Ming Dynasty. At that time, some European scholars still hoped that their research results would be responded to by Chinese scholars. As soon as Kepler's Tabulae Rudolphinae was published in 1627, he immediately sent a copy to China. Missionaries have made great contributions to academic exchanges between China and the West. Some Jesuits were indeed first-rate scholars. Nonetheless, they were also influenced by the Holy See. For example, they have always had an ambiguous attitude towards Copernicus' heliocentric theory, which may not be just for academic reasons. F: You quoted Hu Shi at the beginning of the article, saying that it was still possible at the end of the Ming Dynasty, but since the Qing Dynasty, "the two sides (science) are so different between China and the West that it really cannot be based on the truth." Can you say more quantitatively how far Chinese science declined during the Kangxi dynasty? X: In his later years (1713-1722), Kangxi edited the 100-volume "Lüliyuan". Among them, there are 53 volumes of "The Essence of Mathematics", which he considered to be the encyclopedia of mathematics at that time. After the mid-16th century, the main mathematical developments in Europe included algebraic symbols (1580), logarithms (1614), slide rules (1620), analytic geometry (1620), adding machines (1642), and calculus (1665). The most important of these are analytic geometry and calculus. Without these two, it is difficult to understand and apply Newtonian mechanics. However, there is no analytic geometry and calculus at all in the "Mathematical Encyclopedia" "Mathematical Essence". The compilers may not have known about these two new developments in mathematics. Although the "Chongzhen Almanac" of 1630 in the late Ming Dynasty also lagged behind the West. But it is still far from being completely ignorant of the latest important developments. F: I have been away from China for almost seventeen years, and I am unfamiliar with the "latest important developments". It is often heard that "Emperor Kangxi" appears in videos. What is your evaluation of this video "Emperor Kangxi"? X: Haha... Haha... Not worth talking about, not worth talking about. The main reason for China's repeated defeats by the West since the late Qing Dynasty is not that there are major problems with our traditional culture or system. And the nature of the Manchu Qing Dynasty is that it is an alien regime. The Manchu ruling nation has its own selfish interests. In order to prevent the Han from conquering the Han, they do everything possible to contain China's own modernization and industrialization process, suppress the Han people in every possible way, the Manchu and Han are guessing, and the top and bottom are centrifugal. After Kangxi, China's science and technology quickly fell behind the West, which greatly delayed the time for Chinese society to embark on the industrialization process. At the end of the Qing Dynasty, it still had to be repeatedly defeated by Western powers. From Kangxi's "stifling the people's wisdom" to the reappearance of "stifling the people's wisdom", woohoo! Postscript: Not every word of Academician Xi Zezong's answer has been reviewed by him (eye disease makes it difficult to read). If there are any mistakes, I am responsible. Academician Xi's more detailed arguments can be found in his papers such as "On the Errors of Kangxi's Scientific Policy" ("New List of Ancient Nova and Exploration of the History of Science", 2002).

In the past, it was the novel wrapped in Ma Yuan's skin that I read with gusto. Now, it's Ma Yuan wrapped in the novel's skin and I read it with gusto. God's way is reincarnation, who will God spare?

Later, the author listed all the practical information, that is, reference materials. The theoretical basis covers everything from the Western sage's noodles to the local philosopher Wang Fa's steamed buns. To be honest, it is too dry. It can be said that it is as boring as reading a paper in the library. There are three chapters on scripture analysis and one chapter on plot. But it is this cold list of numbers and theories, this cruel and brutal reality that completely removes the good-looking skin of other books on the success of time travel and reform, allowing you to deduce based on the theory provided by the author of this book. Other classic processes of time travel and reform to dominate the earth are nonsense and a complete insult to the IQ... With Maowu's new book not being released for a long time It is too difficult to find a historical text that is logically self-consistent and does not have too many cheats and conforms to theoretical deductions.