I'm Really a Keyboard Warrior

Success is also set, failure is also set. This book is good and very thoughtful. The setting is novel. Combining science and metaphysics, I actually prefer this setting. After all, existence is reasonable, and the extraordinary either does not exist at all, or the extraordinary itself is a part of the world. Science is not just something we learn, but a methodology, a way to understand the world and make human progress. If metaphysics does exist, then metaphysics is also science. But again, the author obviously doesn't have a good grasp of the plot and throws away the settings too hastily. This seems very long-winded and too hard-core. The setting itself is a double-edged sword. What I think is a very cool setting may be illogical and unreasonable in the eyes of others! And we read for entertainment and recreation, not for class. Read the book for the plot, not the setting! The setting should be mixed with the plot, rather than the plot mixed with the setting. Especially when your settings are not particularly attractive and may even arouse some people's disgust, the more and denser the settings, the more worrying the future of the book will be.

Some people use online writing to talk about things, such as three golden chapters, too many characters, no golden fingers in many chapters, and too many concepts. Well, based on my reading experience, none of the so-called classics adhere to these, so why do classics sound so good in these people's mouths? Because of the psychological gap! There are many people who are not here to read books. No matter how you write it, it will always sound good in their mouths. You will never be able to satisfy these people. In fact, they are not satisfied with themselves. They are a bunch of Lutherans. If you are not like them, they will never be happy. Successful people are too busy to talk to you. The best way to deal with these people is to ask for help when you go out. You should not let these people talk in the book circle. Don't accept criticism by accepting criticism. You will only be misled by these people. If you want to listen to your opinions and improve, there are improvement courses in the author's assistant, which are ten thousand times better than what they say. Then the question is, who is your target reader? Once you bite this one, everything else will be fine. Differentiation cannot satisfy all people. You can only make some people happy, and let the rest go to hell! You can't find your readers now, and readers who will like you can't see you either. You have to find a way to solve this problem. The biggest reason why there is so much hostility on the Internet is that these people are unhappy in reality and come to the Internet to vent their anger. Do these people have the ability to recharge? You have to believe these people and write things that make them happy, then you are really done. I've known you for so long, so I can't say I know enough about it, but I think what you write is suitable for book friends who are willing to make a cup of tea or coffee and enjoy it slowly, so don't let yourself fall short.

It's very interesting, but it depends on the author's status, for sentiment, and investment.

I haven't read this book, I'm just curious about the introduction. What does the introduction mean? Can't understand

In book reviews, you can be sarcastic, you can be hot, you can scold if you don't like it, but the only thing is, don't use bad words, follow the traffic rules when driving, and don't make it inappropriate for children. My son has been reading it, and as a father, I can only delete it in such a situation. I explain it first to avoid offending.

This author is so active😅 If you have time to reply to the readers, you might as well write a few more chapters. There is no need to care about the readers so much...

It's the holidays, and I would like to send the author a big holiday blessing! I wish your work will be great soon🔥! Happy Double Day! 😊😊

Everyone, there are a lot of keyboard warriors, it's in the introduction.

Compare some of the so-called amazing descriptions and settings in science fiction with those in traditional metaphysics to see what our ancestors' imaginations are like. Water drop - the cosmic detector made of strong interacting materials in "Three Body". Because its shape is similar to a water drop, it is called a water drop by humans. The surface will reflect almost all electromagnetic waves, is absolutely smooth, and has a temperature at absolute zero. It uses the overflowing strong interaction force to completely lock the atoms in mutual motion and produce extremely high-strength materials. The essence of the five innate elements - the mountain spirit is called Chi, the material spirit is called Mei, the earth spirit is called Sheep, the water spirit is called Wangxiang, the wood spirit is called Bi Fang, the fire spirit is called You Guang, and the gold spirit is called Qingming. Do you think they all come from "Journey to the West" or "The Romance of the Gods"? Wrong! It comes from the "Zhengbu Lun" recognized by Confucianism and was written by Wang Yi of the Eastern Han Dynasty. Although it has been lost, it is excerpted in "Taiping Yulan", "Yilin" and "Selected Works". Wang Yi also has a relatively famous book that has been handed down, called "Chu Ci Zhang Ju". Whether in Journey to the West it is said that the essence of Kantu Zhenyuan Daxian and the essence of Jiamu are the ginseng and fruit trees, or in The Romance of the Gods it is mentioned that Geng Jin is the precise Taoist priest, Li Huo is the essence of land pressure Taoist, or the essence of Kuishui is Gonggong, all come from the description in "Zhengbu Lun". If we regard what the ancients said as fabricated fantasy, then fantasy is far ahead of the West. In terms of science fiction, we have not been weak since ancient times. Lunheng, which has always been praised as a simple materialist philosophy, in the chapter about Japan: There are three-legged crows in Japan. By the way, Wang Chong, the ancient barbarian, supports the theory of square heaven and believes that the sky is flat, the earth is flat, and the sun is also flat. Haha, does it look like the round sky and square square theory of the Lighthouse Kingdom now? You can't read the bound edition of anything. If you just pick out one sentence, you must believe that Wang Chong in history or ideology is a simple materialist, because he said that people will not become ghosts after death, which is right! By the way, let's talk about "Taiping Yulan", which is a book on immortals in the Song Dynasty. It was compiled by the imperial court and compiled a genealogy of the immortal legends of the past dynasties. Therefore, why the gods and Buddhas in Fengshen and Journey to the West can gather in such groups is not because Wu Cheng'en and Xu Zhonglin have great imagination, but because they all have reference books. Is this an ancient encyclopedia? So, what we often call made-up fantasy (excluding the current situation of killing a sword from Nantianmen to the Hall of Hell) has a system and inheritance, classmates. Taking away the differences in language and characters, what do you think is the difference between the essence of Guishui and the drop of water? How different is the essence of Lihuo from nuclear fusion? The search engine is very convenient. Maybe you can also see the description of the temperature of Nanming Lihuo by the ancients.

I don't know how serious it is 😭

The crowd of experts was bombarded 😰 But this is the first time I have seen the author so active in the book review area The introduction is interesting, add it to your favorites and take a look We can chat when you are free in the future 😏

Although there are some things that I haven't seen yet and can't understand, I still feel that they are very powerful. 6666

For traditional Chinese medicine The theory of traditional Chinese medicine is the system of methods that the ancients tried to establish to treat the occurrence and treatment of diseases. The theory of meridians and the theory of the five internal organs and the five elements are all achievements. They were originally methods to try to explain disease phenomena. The theory of meridians involves part of the neurovascular knowledge, and the five internal organs are not the corresponding specific organs. It can be said that the theory of traditional Chinese medicine is inherently imperfect and is just a set of effective methods. It is useful, but do not deify it. It does have unreasonable and even imaginary parts, but overall it is a summary of human experience in exploring the world.

Don't believe those who say that reading a novel is a relaxing novel without too much effort and mental effort, or that you don't want to write too profoundly! The logic is very simple. If you want to relax, you shouldn't read at all. It's annoying. Reading is a waste of your brain. If you don't want to waste your brain on the upper right corner, wouldn't it be better to watch NC videos on Kuaishou? Why should they leave a message if they don't like it? Wouldn't it be enough to just close the page? Leave a message saying that they want to show their presence. Does it have anything to do with the price of your book? They will appear wherever there are many people and it is lively. Or they may appear wherever there are not many people and no excitement. It is better to show off. Do their opinions matter? If they really know that much, why don't they write it themselves? They have to write really well, they are very busy, and they have time to come here to talk with you? If Qidian is really the kind of people who read Xiaobaishu as they say, and everyone writes Xiaobaishu, then do you have any value in existence? There are so many platinum gold medalists and great masters, but they haven't finished their books yet. What did you write? So their logic is wrong and does not hold true at all. Don't believe what they say, just stick to your style, otherwise it will be more than worth the loss if you disappoint your real book friends. Work with people who care, ignore people who don't care, and treat them as if they don't exist!

I have only read the free chapter so far. It is very comfortable and not irritating. The author is also very personal. I like it very much 😆 (Oh, don't get it wrong [funny]) Because it is a small account, there are not many recommendation tickets for the time being. I will order all the books when the WeChat password is retrieved 🤓

Many people think that science fiction must go faster than the speed of light and become a star. Anything involving traditional Chinese culture is cheap or low. This is wrong. This is the Western-only theory of science. They keep saying that science knows no boundaries, but in the end they draw the boundaries of science first. The subtext is that if it is not Western, it is not science? Let's strip out those scientific terms first. Science fiction and science themselves come from the development of Western theology. If we really want to talk about the basics, no one is nobler than the other! Back to science fiction, is it really science fiction to explode at a speed faster than the speed of light? Does current science support the creation of faster-than-light or star-exploding technologies? If we want to say that logic is self-consistent, then how come they are so self-consistent? Where does the energy come from and where is the system? It's just that they are developed, whether it's film, television or literature and art, flooding the market with a lot of brainwashing, so their views and practices are deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. You really have to argue with them about rationality, it's so reasonable! Then there is a group of people who have been washed away. Anyone who does not use their discourse system is classified as unreasonable. This kind of behavior is just belittling others with colored glasses. For such a person, you really have to use science to say that the tallest person is ugly and Yin Mao. If you can't say more than three sentences, you will be blind! Back to our traditional culture, if you peel off the coat of metaphysics and ignore the words, you try to use science to analyze the things described by metaphysics. You will find that our ancestors are true ancestors, and the magic in the West is the true grandson. I am so imaginative! Not only the imagination, but also the self-consistency and rationality of logic are far higher than theirs. Just like our meridian system and spiritual methods such as mantra, I Ching Bagua, and Qimen Dunjia Formation, are there any equivalents in Western magic? Just hold the elements and talk to the hexagram. It is said that our traditional culture is made up, but we are also very dedicated in making it up, and it has a clear and self-contained system. If you want to say it is self-consistent, then who is more self-consistent?

Haha, what a cool article. I opened Goldfinger from the beginning. I like such fast-paced cool articles. I don't have much time to rest at work, so I can read this book.

I have summarized 3 points about your novel... With the number of my fans, I hope you will not be disrespectful and carefully summarize my suggestions.

This is your typical fantasy about Chinese medicine without any research. One can never know the truth, one can only approach the truth. The human body is complex, so variables must be controlled. Only repeatability can truly apply. You said entities are complex so a single variable cannot solve the problem. But in fact, you can't even figure out a single variable, and it's even worse with multiple variables. The so-called usefulness of traditional Chinese medicine is nothing more than tinkering with applications. But the question is whether the application has any side effects and can it be promoted. The simplest example is aristolochic acid. Just like in Japan, the only way for traditional Chinese medicine to survive is to use waste medicine to save medicine.

Simple, a few things. There are red envelopes where you can get some coins for watching videos. Post a few comments and watch videos to get coins, which can be done many times a day. To sum up, there is no need to waste money, and the coins you receive every day are enough to cover your subscription. Finally, I want to find a way to open activities in the book circle, where I can earn coins. I apologize. I haven't opened the operation. I'm sorry to everyone. I'm starting to pick it up now. Book friends who don't think this book is garbage please raise your hands. If the author doesn't admit defeat and keeps writing, I don't want to just watch. I told the author to write a book review so that he can be more precise and start to attract book friends.

I finally understand that those who, on the one hand, dislike too many professional terms, and on the other, who say they can't understand it, are actually not the target readers of this book. Real science fiction is not prepared for them, but he dare not criticize those classics. Liu Cixin wrote about the dichotomy in The Three-Body Problem. Do they dare to say that they really understand what he explained? It's just that they have to pretend to understand even if they don't understand, otherwise their ignorance and shallow knowledge will be exposed. To be honest, what Liu wrote is scum from a scientific point of view, and even from a scientific point of view, others will dismiss it. So those who have lost face and become depressed in famous books will try to make up for themselves here and show their presence. To put it bluntly, they are just a group of middle schoolers who follow the trend and read novice books. In the final analysis, the biggest reason is that this book is not popular! For example, if we didn't ask a gunman to make a chapter that was full of color, or if we didn't copy Da Fanwan's collection, it's not because the book is not well written.

I didn't watch it and ended it again. My reward was in vain.

The author was really impressed by the names Mei Zheren (no such person), Mei Nianbi (no twister), Ma Zinan (Ma Zinan), and Mei Niangu (coal sticks to the bone).

I found that the title of each chapter of the author has a meaningful meaning. It's so lofty.

I don't know if the book is good or not, but the author is really good. If you get bored in the future, you can come and comment 🤓

🙂

The virtual network can actually explore the fluctuations of human thinking. There are question marks on the face and a bunch of nouns. I really can't understand it and missed it.

After writing a lot, it looks like you are begging others to approve your ideas, which is really disgusting.