Essay About Writing

First of all, make sure that you have the qualities of a scholar, are sincere, and have your own unique insights. First, you have roughly grasped the theme, the hypocrisy, tyranny, oppression and evil of the medieval church and feudal society. Secondly, you highlighted the character's rebellious spirit and romanticism. Thirdly, you find the binary opposition of Garcia's humanity and the complexity of the ending. The shortcomings are that, first, the conclusion in the opening chapter is too absolute and general. The misfortunes of Esmeralda, Sister Gudour and others are more due to the systematic oppression, prejudice and real bad luck of the era. This kind of attributing misfortune mainly to personal qualities is not completely consistent with the intention of the novel to reveal the profound social roots, and it can also be said to be irresponsible. The second is the flattening of character analysis and the insufficient understanding of realism. Quasimodo saves Esmeralda; fights desperately with an army of beggars in front of Notre Dame to protect her; finally kills Claude and marries Esmeralda. He was by no means just a "passive adaptation", but showed amazing courage and firm love and loyalty that broke out in the face of great misfortune and discrimination. This cannot be just a kind heart. Claude is a tragedy where humanity is suppressed due to his clerical status, religious alienation and personal possessiveness are intertwined. Overall, your book review has unique insights, but I look forward to a deeper understanding and interpretation.

Sometimes words have a quiet feeling and endless charm. Good books need to be savored carefully, just like tea.