Byzantine Revival

I personally think there is a problem with the era the author chose. Constantine XI was indeed an undeniably good emperor, but the national power at that time was indeed hard to describe. Why just stare at 1453? Is there no other wise emperor in Eastern Rome? Hire mercenaries from the west, but the result was the usurper Alexios I who came to the house "The most blessed of emperors", the master of the Byzantine revival, the God-Emperor Manuel I The then Byzantine Emperor Isaac II was deposed by his younger brother Alexius III, who triggered the Fourth Crusade You can write all of these, it is much more comfortable than writing about Constantine XI. But since the author has written it, let's continue it and don't give up halfway. Come on (ง •̀_•́)ง

Give me a recommendation vote, add a bookshelf handle, if you can't do these, then leave me a message, at least let me know that I have readers. . .

What do you say? They are all the last Byzantine monarchs anyway. Why not make connections a few years in advance? The Battle of Varna will hurt both sides and recover Greece and Bulgaria by the way. Other flaws aside, the key point is that in 1444, Constantine XI had not yet ascended the throne. His brother John VIII was in power. In 1448, Constantine XI died in depression.

It's a pity that I finally found a novel about Rome and Byzantium, but it ended after seven chapters? In fact, during the golden age of the Byzantine Empire, its national power reached its peak during the reign of Justinian I. The Sui and Tang dynasties at the same time all praised Byzantium. Justinian was the Byzantine version of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty. If not for the plague, Justinian would most likely have restored the glory of the Roman Empire.

This is written... The author is just making a living, right?😵😵😵