Extreme Night Executioner

Just for Chapters 1 to 13: The feeling of fantasy has the flavor of Crusu, but it is not strong enough. There is no fatal point or winning point in the subject matter, story, or plot. There are some minor flaws, the most serious one is that "he" is used more. Let's talk about the advantages: I won't talk about the advantages for fear of making you proud! (Just kidding) There is a delicate beauty that fascinates people. The author works hard and is growing steadily. Have your own persistence, style and taste. Come on, your own may be the best. Work hard and look forward to a better version of yourself tomorrow.

I think some characters who only appear once and get lunch don't need to have a name, and it's only five or six words, so they can be directly referred to by their identity. There are too many unimportant names in the early stage, which always gives me a feeling of confusion.

If I criticize him for not writing well, I have no problem with it. I want to criticize him too, but I am greedy for his votes and short of words, so I shouldn't use too much force (although my own writing may not be as good as his). But if he accuses him of plagiarism, I can't understand it. ① In a legal society, if you suspect someone of plagiarism, you should sue him directly and make him pay money or go to jail; instead of spraying him and giving him time to react. ② When you spray, you don't just spray however you want, but you should show off one, two, three, and spray based on reason. The spray leaves him speechless, convinced, and ashamed. Swearing in the street is the behavior of a shrew, a hooligan, like a howling mad dog, bereft of an orphan, it will only annoy people, make people a laughing stock, not advisable, and a wise man will not do it. ③ If you have time, please spray me too, thank you.

Come and visit me! (Comment from an author's account) 😏

No, what's going on with this book? Why do people keep saying it's plagiarism in the book review section? ? ? ? ? ? I found it from the review section of another book, but I haven't read it yet. Why is this book plagiarized? ? Is plagiarism so easy to judge? ? ? Many memes that have been popular on Tieba for a long time have only been written recently. How does this count as plagiarism? ? ? ? In addition, I think the author's attitude is okay. Newbies in writing books are just imitating and borrowing from everywhere. Everyone has a transition period. Later, when the writing skills are gradually improved, the head becomes more flexible, he can make comments, and he becomes a master. Others can learn from it. This does not mean that this book will become a hit. If something like Douluo Dalu Battle Breaks the Sphere really becomes popular, tell the author whose story you borrowed it from. The author said that it would be enough to advertise for other people's great masters. If you really can't give them a red envelope and give them something, just feel free to do it. Many people won't make it too difficult for newcomers like this. Also, I think that when you read a book, you can read it if you like it. If you have money, you can support a financial institution, but if you don't have the money, you can support a personal one. If you don't like it, just go to the upper right corner ❌❌❌Goodbye Jianghu. There is no need to spit curse words in other people's comment areas.

Report from the far right, come on, come on＾0＾~

If you like this kind of subject matter, please vote for it! Please also pay close attention to "The Phoenix Tribulation of Deep Love and Shallow Fate" 😌

(Host, you have to be obedient) Return visit

Sword Master Xuanqing returns for a visit. Awesome

Collect, pay attention to the end of the mutual visit, and cheer together 🙂

But no story. Favorite reply.

Well, the writing is actually pretty good, but I still feel like skipping chapters, and then I can't understand...

There is no sense of immersion. 'He' uses too much and I can't stand it anymore.

In confirming plagiarism, it is often necessary to distinguish from formally similar behaviors: 1). Plagiarism and utilization of thoughts, ideas and opinions of copyrighted works. Generally speaking, it is legally allowed for an author to freely use the themes, themes, opinions, ideas, etc. Reflected in another work to create new creations, and it cannot be considered plagiarism. 2). The historical background, objective facts, statistics, etc. Of plagiarizing and using other people's works. The copyright laws of various countries do not protect the historical background, objective facts and statistics expressed in the work itself, and anyone can freely use it. However, completely copying someone else's words describing objective facts and historical background may be considered plagiarism. 3). Plagiarism and fair use. Fair use is the legal basis for an author to exploit other people's works, and its scope is generally determined by each country's copyright law. Anything beyond the scope of fair use generally constitutes infringement, but does not necessarily constitute plagiarism. 4). Plagiarism and coincidence. Copyright protects original works, not first-time works. Similar works cannot be considered plagiarism if they are created completely independently by the author. To judge the difference between plagiarism and other behaviors, we can analyze it from the following five aspects: 1). Look at the degree of changes the defendant made to the original work 2). Look at the characteristics of the original work and the defendant's work > 3). Look at the nature of the work 4). Look at the creative skills embodied in the work and the value of the work 5). Look at the defendant's intention

{"NickName":"Undercurrent in the World","UserId":342805387}{"NickName":"Long Ringing Evening Bell","UserId":339799791}Zhang Yuhan, are you there?