Reborn to a Picturesque Farmstead

Editor-in-chief, how did you manage to spot something so illogical and linguistically simplistic?

I can't stand it anymore... She's only known him for a day and she's already saying "I love Xia Sihan"? And when the female lead is spacing out, and you ask her what's wrong, she actually says it's nothing, just a little incident. ??? What kind of little incident?! This story is so cruel!

I couldn't even finish reading two chapters. She shows no emotion towards a strange man, blushes constantly, and kisses him all the time—is she crazy?!

At which chapter did everyone drop the story? I dropped it in chapter four. I saw the story about an old flame, and the logic is... Isn't it supposed to be that older, poor single men can't find wives? Yet he has a lover...

I was wrong. I saw everyone saying it was addictive, which piqued my curiosity, but I couldn't even finish the first chapter 😵. Putting aside the typos, omissions, and incorrect punctuation, just talking about the character relationships and plot, I just want to ask the protagonist, why would anyone want to use you? Are you exceptionally smart and resourceful?

This book made the bestseller list...? It makes me want to write a book myself...

How could this article even make the list? Do they think readers are idiots?

I'm shocked by the basic aesthetic sense of qd's "editor-in-chief"...

I only read one chapter before giving up; the logic is dead.

This article is truly toxic; the writing is so childish... How can it still rank number one on the sales charts? Isn't this just self-deprecation?