The End of the World Begins with Red Alert

I saw a chapter in the table of contents called "Kneel down and apologize." Is there any significance in asking others to kneel down and apologize in the apocalypse? Does the protagonist have any special hobbies? This is a pure insult to the other person's character.

I feel that the first person's writing is a bit not very good. It puts too much into the author's own thoughts instead of paying more attention to the protagonist's character. It feels like the protagonist thinks what you think.

Okay, if you haven't read it yet, let people start reading it by subscribing to the chapter.

Red Alert Soldiers have no emotions. If they did, it would be the biggest failure. Does the author understand Red Alert? Emotions are the most troublesome. The red police should have no emotions and develop quickly to restrain the violent soldiers. This is the best.

A new beginning is okay! Don't disappoint people... Newcomers can start watching from 219.

What's the use of a group of losers without loyalty when there are Red Alert soldiers?

What is this written? If it had been written by another person, it would have been written like this. It would be worse than a eunuch.

The first is to say the sentence "I'm not interested in women", which reminds me of the CEO of Alibaba, and then after a few sentences it becomes, even if I want it, I won't want it. I don't know how many times I have been played with it... Well, it smells so good Then the book explains from the beginning that the protagonist is reborn ten years after the end of the world. Well, personally, it looks like he came out of that famous church in Paris. I have written about the cruelty of the end of the world more than once. Successful people become ordinary people in the end of the world, and they are even more grateful for a little food. Dade, and the latest one, the four people robbing other people's supplies turned out to be a 'little thing', and the reason was actually 'too bloodthirsty'... Author, if you change the reason to 'one less person will make the task more difficult', I personally can still accept it, but what is this 'too bloodthirsty'? , And isn't it only done in peaceful feudal dynasties that only punish the first culprit? In the end of the world, the original rules have been broken, and there will be more such behaviors. The culprit is killed, but the accomplices are not killed. Does this imply that the protagonist has the idea of ​​​​"accomplices are not guilty" in his cognition? But in this way, the protagonist's personality has been refreshed again. The above are all personal opinions. I just feel uncomfortable with the conflict between the two points.

In fact, the protagonist can talk less, be more aloof, have less dialogue, and let the supporting characters speak as much as possible, so that our readers will not feel that there is a problem with IQ when reading, and those who should be ruthless should be ruthless. As the saying goes, if you can do it, don't do it! I hope you can listen to my advice as a bookworm of more than ten years!

Work hard! Put you on my reading list

It looked good from the front, but it didn't look good at all when people were replaced at the back, bye! Stop watching

Don't be a eunuch, I finally found a well-written red warning book∪･ω･∪

A good book, written in a mess

I feel like biting sand when I eat, so I give it up.

Is there any Mental Omega (><) I really want to see Foehn, Missy, and Dish

To be honest, the idea is okay, the plot is okay, but the writing is very poor.

I'm sorry for not accompanying you. Goodbye!