Daming Yuanfu

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​I saw a lot of comments that asked questions. Some said it had too many classical Chinese texts, and some said it contained too much popular science and was too verbose. In short, I just felt that this book was not good or bad. Of course, it is not ruled out that some well-intentioned readers will feel sorry to see this novel with solid knowledge and rich content not popular, and thus remind the author how to improve it to meet the public's taste. After reading this book for a while, I also have some thoughts that I want to share with readers and the author. First of all, reading is a process of two-way selection between readers and writers. If you think this book is not to your taste, then you can quit and read another book. There is no need to criticize other historical articles in the comments. Mentioning other books in the comment area of ​​a book itself is a very rude behavior that disrespects the author. It's not that giving opinions is bad in itself, but that the behavior of pushing back is inappropriate.         ，，""，"" The ambition contained in this book is so huge that the "short and concise" form of online writing - completing the rapid plot advancement in a small number of words is not completely suitable for this book. That's why many readers have mentioned the problem of "large sections of popular science to persuade people to quit." Personally, I don't dislike articles of this style, because I don't treat online articles as a mere pastime for fragmented time, but with a serious mentality of accepting knowledge. I believe that there are not a few readers who agree with me, and at least I can insist on reading more than 2 million words of readers who have similar thoughts. Furthermore, as I mentioned before, the author's ambition is not satisfied with just telling a story, but wants to shape a real historical world through systematic description. But unfortunately, there are certain problems in the way the author shapes the world. The author believes that as long as he lists enough detailed historical information to prove that these characters were chosen in the original history, he can construct the authenticity of the world he creates. In fact, this is not the case, because when the author chooses a historical time-travel novel, the direction of history will inevitably change with the participation of the protagonist, and some choices will also change accordingly. At the same time, from the perspective of storytelling, listing information is certainly an effective method, but listing a large amount of information becomes an act that makes readers doubt the author's creation. If the character described by the author in the previous article is three-dimensional enough, then it would be reasonable enough that he would not need to elaborate on it when he makes a choice that is consistent with the logic of the character.         ，，， At the same time, the description of the behavioral logic of each character in the story is also relatively reasonable, and the behavior of each character basically conforms to the character image created in the previous content. The only regret is that the author could be more confident in his character description and does not need to quote large sections of historical documents to support it. After all, this is not an academic paper but a novel. Moreover, if it is necessary to explain the logic of the next action, you can try to use dialogue and specific events to do it. Simply using psychological description and historical documents does not conform to the form of the novel. Finally, I really like this book. Its description of the late Ming Dynasty has filled many gaps in my personal knowledge of this period of history. I sincerely wish that the results of this book will get better and better, and that the author's writing ability will improve step by step.

The content and ideas are good, but there are some ink stains. Some things do not need to be explained in detail. This is a novel, not a history book. Overall, it is quite good.

The author's writing is too watered down. Many times the explanation is really necessary, but you can use more than half of the chapter outside the plot. This makes it a bit of a drama when you look at it. You often have to think about it, let's go, what plot was going on just now...

The main plot is quite good, but it is too watery and can squeeze out more than half of the water. Some things are explained in detail over and over again. The reader is not a fool and suffers from severe amnesia. And what's the use of writing down the detailed process, formula, chemical formula, and reaction process for making soap? Those who know these things don't have to be so talkative. Those who don't know what you wrote, and they don't have the foundation, they still don't know how. I can't think of any use for these things other than watering them down? Are you using this as a reference book for time travellers?

Hard-core historical articles increase your knowledge

Another ten-year-old genius is born

Got it

Asking for answers from book friends🙏🙏🙏

The writing is too confusing. The protagonist is a 10-year-old child. I couldn't understand it since he entered Beijing. He encountered horse bandits and went to the border to do business. Traveling all over the country. The chaos was ruthless.

The writing is good, but the reason why this book does not do well! 1. There is too much nonsense in popular science, and there are whole paragraphs of popular science! Dialogue and plot are the key to the book. Does the author really not understand? 2. There is no female protagonist in cultivating immortality, I can understand that! After all, people have been in seclusion for hundreds or thousands of years. It's normal to be devoid of desires and not have time to have sex. But pragmatism is a man! Even if she is young, she can still appear in the early stage, and it would be good to make her a princess and princess to whet her appetite. The county leader came here through time? Did you shoot all the cannons before traveling through time? 3. Since we are taking the auxiliary route, we should...

The main content of the novel should be the plot. A large amount of popular science and narration will only distract from the main topic. Long paragraphs of the inner thoughts of the characters will only reduce the reader's reading experience. This is why the author's writing style is good and his knowledge is excellent, but his works are not popular.

What's interesting is that one is flattering and the other is flattering. As someone who doesn't know much about Ming history, it seems that this book's criticism of Zhang and Gao's affirmation are more reasonable. Reading the two articles makes people more interested in the Longwan era. Except for the long part of tracing the roots, the depth and plot rationality are better than Xiaoge Lao. Xiao Ge Lao is even more dramatic. The author can learn from each other's strengths and weaknesses. I hope you can write better works. It would actually be better to delete a lot of information hahaha.         💰❤️         ！

The author has said atheism several times... The problem is that you say atheism from time travel, and I always feel that it is very inconsistent.

This book should be greatly underestimated. A very nice book, great!

Some people who criticize Zhang Juzheng are really ridiculous! After seeing the boasts of several marketing accounts, I thought I understood everything. I really dared to boast that Zhang would be the same person for eternity. What a big face! Even Mingyue said clearly back then that he just liked Zhang personally, so he only wrote about Zhang's positive side in the book, and described Zhang's shameless behavior in one stroke with Spring and Autumn style. In fact, Zhang is famous because his whipping method caused all the people in the mainland to lose their homes and property, and they were exploited twice a year by the southeastern gentry and wealthy merchants! The southeastern gentry who had taken advantage of it had the right to speak. Of course they had to praise Zhang vigorously and wished that his whipping method could continue to be implemented! The funny thing is that it's already 2020, and there are still modern people out there following the trend.

The author is very serious in writing the book, and his writing style is also good. Many of the contents are quite informative. However... (Cough), the grades in the book were not good. When the plot is tense, the author will suddenly add content such as narration and personal biography, which is very long and seriously affects the continuity of the plot and the interest of the novel. The author has a very strong desire to explain and is often eloquent. If you listen to it not as a novel but as a history lesson, it will be very interesting. By the way, the author is not a teacher, right?

Come on, keep reading. For something that is clearly stated in one sentence, you must quote the scriptures and explain the source in detail.

The author of this book has really profound writing skills and is also unique in plot design. However, the most criticized thing is that the popular science section is too long, and the author has no awareness of this aspect (the author of the new chapter also randomly stated that if readers don't want to read it, I won't popularize science. Such willful damage is the author's own reputation). It's not that the author of the novel cannot popularize science, but you have to control the degree. Whenever the author of this book touches on a point, he wants to start talking about it from two thousand years ago. You can just briefly describe it. How can readers have the patience to read long passages of ancient texts? We really can't blame readers for doubting the author's word count.

After writing more than 400,000 words, I created a soap and boasted it everywhere like a treasure. I wasted several chapters just talking about the quality of the soap and the marketing. A broken soap is like building an atomic bomb. On weekdays, he boasts that he wants to save the Ming Dynasty, but when he met Qi Jiguang, he still wanted to keep the gunpowder formula and said he wanted to make a lot of money. . . I understand making money from gunpowder and military industry, but shouldn't that mean exporting war and making money from arms? That's a lot of money. It's just a crappy gunpowder formula that you can use and search for. Could it be that Qi Jiguang would use your crappy stuff to make money? Do you think others have the same pattern as you? The protagonist has a petty attitude everywhere. Even if such a person is talented, I don't believe it if you say he can save the Ming Dynasty! What Cao Cao said: A real man should have the ability to contain the universe and the ambition to express heaven and earth. Do the main characters look alike? He just gives people the appearance of a fussy little businessman, and then you tell me that he wants to save the Ming Dynasty? Excuse me?

Your novel is good to read, but there are too many groceries. What you write is a novel, not a history textbook. I want to read it but can't read it. I want to read it. Please add less groceries at the end. Thanks

I found that this kind of reasonable writing is really cool, and the intensity of the protagonist is completely supermodel. On the surface, he is just a minister, and he seems to be evenly matched with the Heart School, but the territory and power he actually controls is equivalent to that of a king of a big country. And because he is the "founding king", he has strong control over his subordinates. There should be no precedent for this in history, and there is no reference, but it is really cool.

It feels like we are here to read novels, not to popularize science knowledge.

It's just that popular science takes up too much space. I really look down on the genuine version.

The book is a good book, and the writing style is also very good. However, there are too many notes and too many private information. It is easy to get into trouble and makes me very tired after reading it.

Authors are reminded that when at least one-third of a chapter of your book is explanatory text, it will seriously affect the reading experience. Readers will read the story rather than various explanatory texts. Originally, these words could have been written out through comments and now they are placed in the main text...

The economic base determines the superstructure, and the superstructure reacts on the economic base. Unless the protagonist can find a way to change the organizational form of the political power, his approach of developing a capitalist economic model under the feudal economic system will at best be a Westernization movement, which is unlikely to have real success and may instead bring about a huge crisis.

As long as this book is recommended by a historical guru, it will definitely become popular. The average order is 2,000 to 4,000. A monthly ticket of 1,000 to 2,000 per month is the normal level of this book. You can go to Longkong to recommend it. It is in line with their taste. It is completely the material for writing a book. It is not very popular. I guess it is probably because the protagonist is a younger brother and not an emperor?

Give this book a PY, it will definitely become popular in niche circles. If the language and narrative structure of the next book are adjusted, it has the potential to become popular in historical literature.

A masterpiece, this two-character book is worthy of its reputation

It's so cool to get 40,000 more updates every day. Keep up the good work, dear.