Mount and Blade Empire

The author wants to write about the great chaos of civilization. I have no problem with setting the background in the 7th or 8th century but the Han Dynasty still exists. But I can't accept your messy technology. I had a bit of an ominous premonition when I first saw a Crusaders, but I was still confused when I saw the English longbow. It was also mentioned that the English longbowmen have begun to show their prominence... The English Longbow Bows began to develop after the Normandy conquered England in the 11th century and banned civilians from holding knightly equipment but bows and arrows. It was not until the 13th century that it began to gain fame. How come it came to the 7th and 8th centuries AD? That's fine. After all, war promotes technology, and then a Genoese crossbowman appeared. The mercenaries that only appeared in the 15th century cannot be explained by technology. Then I looked back and looked at the Han army. They were still using bronze wares with iron wares. Their chariots had just been eliminated and there was no steel cladding method. They were basically still stuck in the Eastern Han Dynasty-Three Kingdoms era in the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD... Facing all the troops with iron (perhaps steel) weapons and chain mail and scale armor, take Ying Ge The Orchid Longbow and the Composite Bow are just cannon fodder hired by a local agent of a principality. This equipment has been passed down several times. This kind of technological gap of thousands of years has only been lost in the Western Region. I also admire the Han Army 😅

I am the Star Destroyer Crossbow of the Qin Dynasty... The ship-cutting knife of the Tang Dynasty, the electromagnetic gun of the Divine Arm of the Song Dynasty, and the three-eyed Gatling gun of the Ming Dynasty.

Riding and slashing players? May he live long!

There is one thing to say, read the introduction, the author's superficial ancient military knowledge is really correct 👍 It is indeed shallow

The author, Hu Ji, wrote nonsense. The 15th-century European technology bullied the 1st-century technology of bronze and iron in the Han Dynasty. He was also drunk.

Except for the European armies after the Industrial Revolution, the strategies and tactics of the previous armies are really not good! Another thing is that there is no comparison between the European village chief war and our large group war! They have fewer people, focus on life, and may have better equipment for single players. There are many of us, so our equipment cannot be too good and we should not pay attention to life. What's more, since the Qin Dynasty, we have been using standard equipment, and they mainly have soldiers making their own equipment. There are also religious wars, but we don't have those things. In the Middle Ages in Europe, crossbows were not allowed to be used for fear of hurting the nobles, so many of their movies and games included some awesome crossbows.

Villains die from talking too much, and good stories die from being verbose. The introduction of the real old lady is like a bandage around her feet. She is so angry that she is so angry that her balls hurt. Please roll off first as a sign of respect.

Stop writing blindly about riding and slashing, it makes no sense

The author writes well! It's not easy to write more than 1.2 Million words of hard work! Although the gap between him and those great masters is obvious, he has great potential, come on!

It's so long-winded... It's very long-winded... It makes me want to kill someone. I suggest you don't read it. If you read it, I suggest you abandon the book.

In order to explain the origin of the weapons produced by the system, it was necessary to embed the memory into the designated NPC, and even went so far as to say that the memory and emotions of the NPC could not be changed. When an NPC "provides" weapons to the protagonist, it is already considered as taking sides. . .

Please post the protagonist's attributes, and can he upgrade his attribute-increasing skills and weapon proficiency?

I see that the system now has almost no sense of existence and is constantly playing. If the system is useless, why not not use it? In fact, the world background designed in this book is quite good. And so far, there is almost no farming content streamed in the system.

Does this have anything to do with riding and cutting?

To be honest, when it comes to infantry, China, Macedonia, and the First Roman Republic are better. When it comes to cavalry, Chinese heavy crossbow cavalry, Mongolian horse archers, Hunnic assault cavalry, Byzantine Empire armored holy cavalry, Seljuk Empire rangers, Lithuanian Polish Grand Duchy's wing cavalry, and Mamluk slave cavalry are all outstanding.

Anyway, I think there are only a few countries in the world such as Qin, Han, Sui, and Tang that can resist the Chinese army. After all, this is the most aggressive Han dynasty. It is nothing more than profit.

Look at my Great Wall Star Destroyer Cannon Cai Lun Two-Way Foil Da Song Infantry Armor Type 2 MS Da Yuan Water Drop Heavy Cavalry Da Qing Northern Galaxy Navy

Calradia Continent

The book review section is all about criticizing the author...🤭