Morning Bell of Mu Mansion

Internet articles basically have plots of "setting up a trap (plan)" and "counterattack (slapping in the face)". But they all use "power", "money", "framing", etc. - That is, they use "villain" methods to deal with "villain". I have never seen anyone use "power" or "law", let alone use "reason" or "emotion". . . "How does a gentleman fight back and succeed" - although it is in line with morality and legal principles, it is still somewhat inconsistent with reality (too difficult). Of course, after all, this is a novel, not documentary literature, and it is not reality. Such a plot is naturally difficult to write, and it will definitely consume more brain cells to write it out, let alone write such a plot well and reasonably. . . (Although I don't like the so-called "dark text", I am also not optimistic about the plot setting of "Gentleman Strikes Back") The flashback in the first chapter is not intended to evaluate its literary merits, but one thing directly tells readers: the ceiling of the protagonist (probably the protagonist)'s strength. If there is no setting of rebirth and time travel, even if a cheat is given in a novel of this type, it would be difficult to make sense - the higher the degree of overlap with reality, the more difficult it would be to use the cheat appropriately. And if there is no golden finger. . . It is difficult for this type of novel to become a "market" online article - after all, Internet readers' tastes must be somewhat "refreshing". Regardless of fame, power, wealth or beauty, these are usually the "values" that are pursued "bustlingly". But what about "gentlemen"? "The three principles of a gentleman are that I am incompetent. A benevolent man does not worry, a knowledgeable man does not confuse, and a brave man does not fear." - "The Analects of Confucius·Xianwen" A gentleman has nine thoughts: Seeing is wise, listening is wise, looking is warm, looking is respectful, speaking is loyal, doing is respectful, doubtful and asking, angry and difficult, seeing is thinking. There are four things a gentleman does not do: First, a gentleman should not act rashly, he must do so in a proper way; Second, a gentleman does not speak empty words, but his words must be reasonable; Third, a gentleman is unscrupulous in his requests, and his requests will be justified; Fourth, a gentleman does not act in vain, and his actions must be righteous. A gentleman is one who does not flatter those who are powerful, does not adhere to those who are powerful, does not worship those who are charming, does not hate those who are dirty, does not fear those who are strong, does not bully those who are weak, befriends those who are good, abandons those who are evil, respects those who are old, shelters those who are young, lives in peace for the people, fulfills his duties as an official, does not betray justice when he is poor, and does not deviate from the Tao. PS: Anyone with some social experience will regretfully say (except for villains) that in reality, a gentleman cannot "succeed", especially if he starts from the bottom (the ancient meaning also evolved from the son of the king to the noble, and then to the meaning of morality)