National Detective

After reading it, let me give you some personal opinions. First, stop being so stupid and slap in the face. As a detective, can you not have to deal with the police at all? The plot of the bet with the deputy director can only reduce the novel to a clichéd urban novel. Secondly, I don't know what proportion of urban and detective reasoning elements the author expected. If the detective is just an addition, it can be ignored, but if you want to use it as a selling point, the reasoning and detective elements of the current "cases" are too weak. In addition to tracking the squats, the original problem of "stealing information from the police station" was also brainlessly solved by "Superman props", which only makes the look and feel worse. One suggestion is to strengthen the reasoning and crime-solving link (it is too weak), and the other is to reduce the ability and dependence of props. Third, the highlights of reasoning, detective work, and case solving have always been the twists and turns of the mystery, the ups and downs of solving the case, and the unclear and eerie conclusion of the case. However, as far as the current cases are concerned, none of these are present, and each case is unremarkable. One suggestion is to launch a sudden and important case as soon as possible to involve the protagonist, and the other is to reconsider how to write the case in a more pretentious way.