Death Multiple Choice Question

It's not enough to watch. Let's fatten it up and then kill it~

Actually, the writing is still very good, but the psychological description of the protagonist feels very weak and poor. The action description of the protagonist is also quite poor. This is the first time I have encountered such a novel. The protagonist is not well written, but the book is not bad.

There is a subplot planned for readers to decide, 1. Xiaoxue is dead. 2. Xiaoxue is not dead. Both have their own follow-up plots. I personally planned to let Xiaoxue die, but I felt it was too miserable, so I left this problem to you. 😌

This protagonist is so annoying. The type I hate is ungrateful and pretends to be willing to do anything for love: turning him into a selfish scumbag, repaying kindness with revenge, treachery: wolf-hearted and dog-eating, omitting 10,000 words.

1. If the author has time, he can try to modify the previous part about the character development of the protagonist, that is, those who kill the boss. After all, some people will be disgusted by the kindness of upbringing and killing people just because of a moment of talk. Adding some descriptions of the protagonist by the boss who were not very good in the past may make it easier for people to accept, and it may make more people watch. However, if the character of the protagonist later will collapse, then forget it. 2. Regarding space (I hope I can write it there), I hope that other forms can be added to the game mode. I hope it can give the author some inspiration. In some games, such as "Until Dawn", the setting is also a choice, which will have an impact later, similar to the butterfly effect. Or you can watch a movie from the perspective of a bystander and then give options in some places. For example, one weekend morning, you boarded a ship bound for XX city because of the invitation of a classmate. You walk into a room and start packing your luggage, when a sailor yells: A storm is coming! The ship began to shake violently. Will you at this time? 1. Go out and have a look 2. Hold the handrails 3. Isn't it just a storm? Continue to organize it (but I personally feel that writing this will make me a bit mentally retarded. It consumes brain cells to write, so I need to add some extra tips or something, and the description must be a bit powerful, otherwise I really won't feel it, and the number of participants must be large, otherwise they may die soon) PS: If you don't like my personal opinion, please don't criticize it. Otherwise, I will order it all if it is put on the shelves.

Author, please update...

It feels like updates are so slow. . . . Raise it first

Come on＾0＾~, this book will be a big hit!

Does the author know about the "Prisoner's Dilemma"? Hope it can appear in future games. I really like this type of book and hope the author will keep up the good work! The story of the Prisoner's Dilemma is that two suspects were caught by the police after committing a crime and were locked in different rooms for interrogation. The police knew the two men were guilty but lacked sufficient evidence. The police told everyone: If both deny, each will be sentenced to one year; if both confess, each will be sentenced to eight years; if one of the two confesses and the other denies, the one who confesses will be released, and the one who denies will be sentenced to ten years. Therefore, each prisoner faces two choices: confess or deny. However, no matter what the accomplice chooses, the best choice for each prisoner is to confess: if the accomplice denies, he will be released if he confesses. If he denies, he will be sentenced to one year, and confessing is better than not confessing; As a result, both suspects chose to confess and were each sentenced to eight years in prison. If both of them deny it, each will be sentenced to one year, which is obviously a good result. But this Pareto improvement cannot be achieved because it cannot satisfy the individual rational requirements of human beings. The profound problem reflected in the Prisoner's Dilemma is that human beings' individual rationality can sometimes lead to collective irrationality - smart humans will get trapped in a cocoon due to their own intelligence, or harm the interests of the collective. Single multiple Single and multiple prisoner's dilemmas have different outcomes. In an iterated prisoner's dilemma, the game is played over and over again. Each player thus has the opportunity to "punish" the other player for his uncooperative behavior in the previous round. At this point, cooperation may emerge as a balancing act. The motivation to cheat may then be overcome by the threat of punishment, which may lead to a better, cooperative outcome. When the number of repetitions is close to infinite, the Nash equilibrium tends to Pareto optimality, from mutual betrayal to mutual loyalty. Purpose Although the prisoners cooperate with each other and do not tell the truth, it can bring the best interests to everyone (acquittal), but when the performance of the other party is unknown, because betraying their accomplices can bring benefits to themselves (shortening the sentence), and also because the accomplices can bring benefits to him by recruiting themselves, so betraying each other is against the best common interests, but is in his own best interests. But in fact, it is impossible for law enforcement agencies to set up such a situation to induce all prisoners to confess, because the prisoners must consider factors other than the prison term (retaliation for betraying accomplices, etc.), And cannot completely use the interests (sentence period) set by law enforcement as the only factor to consider.

What the hell is the latest chapter about? Can the author determine the character of the protagonist before writing it? What are the various self-contradictions about? Rarely, I thought it was a good book, and the previous poisonous points could understand the needs of plot development, but in the end, the latest chapter was really poisonous. If the author is in a bad state and cannot write a reasonable plot for a while, then it is better to stop updating and sort out the plot before writing, so as not to fool us readers.

I'm just here to get activity points. Leave me alone 233

Chapter 9 I felt so embarrassed watching it

Daily tasks Daily tasks Daily tasks

Think about it, if the boss thinks that the protagonist thinks he will take action, then the protagonist will use scissors, then the boss himself will... Use rocks.

"Infinite Death Trial" decryption infinite stream. Fist is the last word, but wisdom can get you to the end. The first dungeon world that the protagonist enters is the end of the world, but the protagonist does not know it and begins his infinite road. The author of this book likes foreshadowing, and there are foreshadowings in many places, and the plot turns are very good and always unexpected. The author is a newcomer, and his writing style was a bit immature at the beginning. Later, he wrote better and better, and his imagination became bigger and bigger. Recommend! Friends who like it can find out by reading the introduction.

It seems like this book has ended just like the last chapter.

Daily tasks Daily tasks Daily tasks

If you don't have enough IQ, you shouldn't write this kind of article. It makes me very embarrassed.

Daily tasks Daily tasks Daily tasks

What did you write before? This is stupid, right?

Are you sick of your IQ, a primary school student?

That's not quite right. When players look back at the game records of the last game, they will find that No. 4 Did not die but No. 3 Died in Qiye, causing the game to end. However, no other players used the ghost sealing card to successfully escape. At the same time, Qiye will definitely choose to kill No. 4, So it is obvious that in that situation, No. 4 Killed No. 3. As for the method used, it must be related to the title of Greedy. The Greedy One has hidden this ability, and any normal person's IQ can guess the Greedy One's ability to graft death, as well as the rules for adjacent positions to spread. So isn't there any doubt in Taotie's request to form a team? I feel like there's something wrong

This book is very good. I've given you seven recommendation votes. Keep up the good work!

The author Da Da has a new book called "Choose Death" that is suspected of plagiarism. Death multiple choice question

In fact, the boss thought that if he wanted Lin Ling to die, he would definitely use paper. If I showed paper, he would definitely have thought that Lin Ling would use scissors. I still used rocks and killed him in the same way. Who knows that cleverness will be misled by cleverness, and Lin Ling showed paper 😁 But when I saw this, I gave up. I didn't feel any pressure to kill more than a dozen people, but I killed the boss. That's all the shit happened