The Rise of a Washed-Up Star, Starting with a Web Series

The author writes really well. In fact, what I like most is not just the world view here, but the character of the protagonist. In this real world, the margin of error for women is pitifully small. Once given the opportunity, women have to work very hard to climb up in order to be recognized. The protagonist's lines are not good. In the real world, he has to work hard to improve his lines in order to seize the opportunity. She must work hard to change herself and improve herself in order to be seen. As for the protagonist in the article, her lines have improved a bit and her acting skills are not much better, but she does not have the mentality of women in reality who are eager to change, and she does not feel that she will be doomed if she does not improve. She has a sense of relaxation, even if I am not good, you can't quit me, because this is a society with a surprisingly high fault tolerance rate for women. She does not have to rush to improve and change, everything can be done slowly, and there is no need to seize the woman's youthful age, because in the article, a woman is a teenager until she dies, and her whole life is a good time.

I uninstalled Jinjiang today. I will not come here to watch jokes in the future. Maybe I will continue to watch jokes elsewhere. Many female-loving authors have taken sides, but I don't feel any disappointment or anger. On the contrary, it just makes no sense as it should. Because of this novel, I have finished it, but in reality there will always be a sequel. People are like this, and they don't appear wise just because they express their position. It can only be said that this is what happens when artificial idols are regarded as spiritual leaders and fictitious personalities are regarded as the author's moral character. This is what happens when the result of justice is placed on idol representatives and then attempts to explain some values. Equating fitness and novels with women's rights rather than commodity premiums, trying to cut but insisting on blood transfusions, when black humor becomes a hell joke, are actually of little value. Most women always feel that being worthless is negative, but useless things only exist, and some things have to always exist, so they are useless. Finally, I would like to say goodbye to everyone with a joke from hell: there will be more in the future, and it will continue in the future, as long as people still need illusory slogans of justice and values ​​to whitewash their positions.

In the new year, I wish our enemies become thinner and thinner, and support the freedom of boys! [Shy][shy][shy]

I have been reading it carefully for a long time. So far, the author's writing is really good. I think the worldview and the aspects of fertility and wording have changed very well. In fact, I have also read some demining comments in Chapter 1/3, but I think it is not really important. The point is that these words are not r-female but r-male. The quality of words is usually defined by those in power. I really don't think it is necessary to dwell on that small point). Anyway, the meaning is there. Looking through books and dictionaries shows that the past words are not completely r-female. Is it really important? It's up to us to define it from now on. Apart from these, I think the author also writes very well. What surprises me is that the author does not portray women in a world of "male equality" as bright and upright, as harmonious and friendly between women, and as giving all privileges to any woman. I think women are also human beings, and people have dark sides, which is not very good. I like the saying that women on the Internet are born with the ability to love. Even in a world of female supremacy, there will definitely be swords and swords between women, some are exploitative, some are dark, and some are vicious. The author has established the personalities of many characters in the article. The characters are all plump and stylish, and they are completely natural women, not characters based on "feminine traits". In short, the writing is very, very good. I am not very good at words, so I don't know how to praise it?????? The author will make a fortune and have a healthy life!

The more I asked, could it be a lesbian? Let me take a blind guess.

Support, history is about little boys who can be dressed up by others, women should write women's history

Every time I see my daughter, I want to strangle her to death [question mark]

Sometimes I have similar thoughts to the author. I feel that neither radical women nor moderates can solve existing problems and both have limitations. But I can't think of any more practical possibilities for change, so I'd better support the existing path.

Finished reading. How to say it? The author is indeed a woman who likes black humor and satire, does not identify with groups and slogans, and is very self-centered and sharp. Although I didn't get a new goal after reading this article, and the author didn't intend to lead anything (the opposing comments have no more valuable content), there is only a completed society that the author himself can accept. Even after being ridiculed, I can't fully accept the author's views, but the views on cows and female genitalia are indeed very eye-catching and very realistic speculations, for which I am very grateful. So that's it. This book is just like that. It's not particularly worth reading, nor is it not worth reading. It has good points that make people neither love nor hate it. It's a book with very complicated emotions. Lesbians who are very similar to the author should love to read it. I will probably read the next book written by the author, hahaha, unless the author changes gender and becomes someone who likes to abuse women.

After seeing this, I suddenly want to watch a female channel with an equal world view. Do you have any recommendations? [A Dog's Head Holds a Rose]