The Idiot Villain [Infinite]

The first part is really well written... But the ending is a bit too abrupt... Will the author write their extras again? [Poor] [Poor] [Poor]

I understand why it's said to be a mess... But the first and middle stages are really good.

It seems that this may be the first time I have written such an in-depth review. The article is quite decent. My first feeling after reading it was that I have finished reading it? Ah, are you finished reading this? Because I feel that there are still many things that have not been explained, such as the nine gods mentioned by the author at the end of the article. Currently (perhaps because I did not read the article carefully), I only remember the neighbor Brother Tan (00), the brother Yu Lin (01) and the little concubine (08). At most, there is a villain Qin Du. I guess the remaining five may be slices of Tan? But it is impossible for the nine gods to have slices, and I remember that this article should be 1v1, but the protagonist Gong Neighbor Brother seems to have appeared in the last dungeon, 1, and in these dungeons, the author almost did not introduce the trump card of cannon fodder Gong in the author's words, and only explained the identity of Li Zhao, Qin Du Tanlan, at the end. So I would like to ask the author's initial identity of Chi, Yuan's identity, and where is the identity of Bian who concealed the information about his brother and then looking for Xiao Peng? Because they are cannon fodder, there is no need to explain to them? Is he just a tool to show how much Xiaopeng is loved? I hope that the author can consider the problems of these characters when he thinks of this novel that he devoted countless efforts to in the future. 2. It's okay if the author wants to write a heartthrob, and it's okay if he wants to set up hardships, but I want to say two problems. One is the copy in the school. At the beginning, the author seemed to have set up another heartthrob, but he was persuaded to change it by the comments. A good author who listened to the advice. The second is the dungeon of Succubus. I really felt uncomfortable watching it, but no one said anything. I myself made some complaints in the dungeon of Succubus. I want to say that the part where Xiao Peng went back to the source of pollution really made people very angry. Why did it have to be such a stupid plot? It's that everyone can see that it's a trap. Only Xiaopeng is innocent (to put it bluntly, she's stupid) and has no hesitation to save people. I really bother to look at my own situation before saving others. No one can risk their own life to save others when their own safety is not guaranteed, unless they are lovers of life and death. However, in the entire copy and even the full text, Xiaopeng does not know that the source of pollution is Xiaoqin, thinking that he is just an NPC (actually I have also forgotten who the cannon fodder is, whether it is the protagonist attacker or the cannon fodder NPC.) I know that it is impossible to have a plot of selfless love and saving people, because he does not love that character that much. I think he could have been caught in the plot when he turned around and met an angel in the hotel, or after that plot, when he turned around and went out, he thought he had escaped, but was caught by the archangel. No matter which plot, I think it is better than going to save people and being caught in a cage on the spot. 3. This is the problem in the second half of the novel. It is divided into two routes. One is that the temple is looking for relatives. Second, I remember there was a big competition (there seemed to be four life-saving props and several mahjong tiles). I don't know why the author only wrote the family line where the brother recognized Xiao Cheng during the competition, but in the end I didn't see the author writing about the end of the competition, and there was no description of the rewards. Three questions, one is to respect the characters. The author himself must know who the character is in the copy, who the NPC is, who the protagonist is, and who the brother is. Don't throw away the characters after they are used up. As the mother of the novel, you should understand them as you would your own children and explain them clearly. The second is to understand the logical issues and the character settings. Don't write behavior that seems to have a low IQ. He is just not smart but not stupid. The villain must also fit the setting. I think Qin Du's writing is okay. Third, when you dig a hole, you have to fill it. The author must remember some settings. If you set it up and don't write it, are you waiting for the comment area to give you inspiration? ? ? I spent money to see this? I hope the author can think about it when revising the article. It may be that the author is busy in the third dimension and if there is no problem, just change it. In the end, I spent money and read the whole novel with true feelings. It doesn't matter if anyone doesn't read my comments. I just have to say it. If you criticize me, you have to say it with reason. I hope the author can become better, and I hope the novel can be written more fully without any harmful intentions. I have done my best by commenting. Whether the author listens or not is not within my jurisdiction. All I do is to hope that others can have a better experience when they read the novel. [Changed]

The ending is so rushed, I can't even believe it's the last chapter

It ended unexpectedly [fear]

I really want to see the plot of returning to the game world to let players know that the temple is Yu Ling's brother and that system No. 00 Is Qin Lingqi's system [crying loudly], as well as the fate of the bad character Greedy being dealt with by Yu Lin and Qin Lingqi, the follow-up of Yu Ling and the players he met in each copy in the game world, the follow-up of what Yu Lin mentioned in the copy to deal with, and whether Qin Lingqi's body will recover It ended abruptly without being written clearly. Qin Lingqi's confession at the end was also very hasty [crying] The emotional scene was not described at all. I was so broken. I stayed up late to read the article for almost two days. Why did such a good novel end so poorly [crying] Fortunately, the text filled in some details [crying]. Can the author write more extras?

Uncle! It's my uncle!

In fact, the writing is quite good... But why did the ending end so hastily like a comic that was cut in half for no reason...

Ugh, it's really unpleasant to watch. The villain was handled too hastily.

The writing style of DaDa is very smooth and the plot is very attractive, especially the foreshadowing in the previous article is just right. If the ending of the story can be described in more detail and the foreshadowing in the previous article can be used well, this article will be more brilliant. Overall, DaDa is still very good. Looking forward to the next masterpiece of DaDa?