Throwing the Doting Wife and the Overbearing CEO into a New World of Gender Equality

Due to some accidental events, I found that most people know very little about outstanding female figures. For example, everyone can name the first shot against the rule of the Qin Dynasty, Chen Sheng Wu Guang, Daze Township Uprising. But few people can tell about the first shot against Wang Mang's tyranny, Lu Mu's uprising. Some people may say that it was because Lu's mother was not the final winner. But Chen Sheng and Wu Guang are not the same, but their popularity is much higher than that of Lu Mu. Furthermore, Lu's mother could not be considered a failure in the strict sense. She fell ill and died. After her death, most of her troops were absorbed by the Red Eyebrow Army. It can be said that she was the one who finally overthrew Wang Mang, and she still had a piece of the military medal. But few people know her name. Is there a piece of work that can be used to promote these characters that are very little known, but are obviously very exciting?

I just checked a set of data. In 2024, the national male population will be approximately 720.32 Million. In 2024, there will be 1.6 Million criminal offenders in the country, of which approximately 1.43 Million will be male. Converted, it's about 0.2%. His father, the rate of dog bites in China is only 0.00542%.

Mythical character, I have always liked Nezha. So it has always been a pity that no author with good writing skills has written about Nezha's sex. I saw an analysis video today that made me feel inexplicably reasonable. Nezha, as a beloved little boy in the feudal society, was actually forced by his own father to cut off his bones to return to his father and cut off his flesh to return to his mother. It seems logically unreasonable. But if Nezha was the youngest daughter, would the story be like this: The Dragon King asked for the sacrifice of a virgin. As the youngest daughter who was not valued, she was forced to marry Ao Bing. On the day of her wedding, she skinned Ao Bing and suffered cramps, and was held accountable by the Dragon King and Heaven. After cutting off the bones to return to his father and returning the flesh to his mother, he was rescued by Taiyi Zhenren and reshaped his body. But because she didn't want to be a wife and mother, Master Taiyi gave her a male body... Although this is also the up owner's own speculation, it really feels inexplicably reasonable.

I saw a video two days ago, an up owner's thoughts on the preference for boys over girls. The reason is that there is a puppy park near the home of the up owner, and many families with dogs go there to walk their dogs together. But the owner discovered that all the dogs playing there were male dogs. After asking a few owners, I probably got the idea. To put it bluntly, the owner of the bitch was worried that she might have gotten pregnant without noticing. At that time, whether she clenches her teeth to give birth or undergoes induction of labor, it will cause damage to the female dog's body and cost a lot of money. So, I decided not to bring my dog ​​here to play. Male dog owners don't have this concern. So, the bitch just lost the park. Up mainly associates with people. In early human society, there was no marriage and no concept of chastity. When a woman and a man become pregnant together, whether it is "birth leading to population death" or "pregnancy leading to a reduction in the labor force", these risks are borne by the woman's tribe, and the man's tribe has almost zero risk. So, like the owner of a bitch, the tribal leader simply refused to let the girl enter the "park". This also reminded me of the short article I read before, about a certain rural teacher. The principal did not allow the female teacher to go out alone, but the male teacher did as he pleased. Of course, the principal had good intentions and really protected the female teachers who were teaching as volunteers, but at the same time, the female teachers lost the "world outside the school." Going back to the beginning, there may be another version of the story about the puppy park. For example, the owners of female dogs are strong enough to occupy the park and not allow male dogs to enter. But if this is the case, they are obviously at fault. After all, the park is public property and anyone can enter. But if anyone can enter, in the end they have no choice but to prevent the female dog from entering in order to protect the female dog. It's an endless loop.

I recently studied history and discovered a point that surprised me very, very much, and I wanted to discuss it with you girls. At present, China's earliest document on the mourning system comes from the Confucian "Etiquette: Mourning Clothes", which clearly establishes the hierarchical differences in mourning for mothers and fathers. The core stipulation is "the period of the wand is one year for the father to be the mother, the wand is to be wilted for the father to die for three years, and the wand to be wrenched for the father is three years." In layman's terms, if the father dies, regardless of whether the mother dies, the child will have to mourn for three years (the heaviest mourning dress, burlap without hems, will last for 25 or 27 months). But if the mother dies and the father is still alive at this time, he only needs to wear the wand for one year (the next step is to wear mourning clothes, burlap hems, and hold the wand). The reason is that "the Supreme Being is here, but I dare not extend my personal dignity." But if the father is already dead when the mother dies, he will have to mourn for the mother for three years (the period of mourning is the same as that of the father, but the mourning level is still lower than the mourning ceremony). In other words, at least during the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, the concept that "father" is more noble than "mother" has already been formed. (There is really no way to study the Xia, Shang and Western Zhou dynasties) During the Han Dynasty, the Confucian etiquette system gradually became official, and the provisions of "Rituals" became the mainstream. Although there are some changes in practice, the system of "the father serves the mother for a term of one year, and the father's death serves the mother for three years" is basically still used. Later, Wu Zetian asked her father to serve her mother for three years, and Gaozong agreed. However, it caused widespread controversy and was not actually implemented. During the Wu and Zhou Dynasties, "the father served his mother for three years" was not officially incorporated into the law. Later, during the Kaiyuan period, the ancient rituals were temporarily restored, and it was not until the 20th year of Kaiyuan that they were finally established as a system. But at this time, although both parents served for three years, one was "off for three years" and the other was "for three years together", and there was still a difference in grade. Who proposed the system of "parents equal favor"? It may be difficult for everyone to believe that it was Zhu Yuanzhang who restored the burial system and killed more than forty concubines. He used the funeral of Sun Guifei to promote fundamental reforms, and finally stipulated in "Xiaoci Lu": ​ "A son is his parent, and a concubine is his mother, and both will decline for three years." (Promote the status of mother's service and realize the kindness of parents) "Legendary sons and other sons are concubines, and they are all in the same period of mourning." (The system of mourning for concubines was established) Since then, the ethical order of "equal kindness to parents" continued until the late Qing Dynasty, affecting many aspects. From our perspective now, we definitely find it unreasonable. Why should a gamete donor be "equal" with the mother? But compared with the "father respects mother and mother is inferior" that started in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, "parents are equal to each other" is obviously progressive. Of course, I cannot think that Zhu Yuanzhang was trying to improve the status of women (the fact that he buried more than 40 concubines was enough to prove that he did not regard women as human beings), but why did he do this thing that obviously had great resistance?

This book is a milestone in my thinking on the road to feminism. The author is really great. It made me realize what I didn't realize before, and gave me a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of what I was vaguely aware of. I really want to read the next chapters. Today, I almost discovered that sis has been discussing real-life problems in the comments, and I couldn't help but join in. In fact, I haven't had such an in-depth thinking output for a long time, and my current life is affected by the environment. I will firmly go further and further on the road to women's rights

In the past two days, I have learned in detail about the Shenlong Coup during Wu Zetian's period (the one that forced Wu Zetian to abdicate). To be honest, my mood is a bit complicated. Of course I know that Wu Zetian cannot be entirely blamed. After all, she has reached the highest point in a patriarchal society. But I still feel that it is a pity. It would be nice if it could be better... First of all, when Wu Zetian ascended the throne, hidden dangers had actually been laid. Because she "inherited" Li Tang's empire, the ministers in the court were basically the team left over from Li Tang's period. Many of these people had served as officials during the Taizong and Gaozong periods, and their hearts were toward Li Tang. When Wu Zetian was a little younger, it might have been better, she could suppress them. But as she grew old and became seriously ill, her control over the court weakened, and problems arose. In the final analysis, she lacked a core force that could swear allegiance to her, and almost no one stood up to defend Wu Zhou when the coup occurred. Here you can compare Zhao Kuangyin. Although Zhao Kuangyin usurped the Later Zhou Dynasty, he "led his own team to usurp the Later Zhou Dynasty." Zhao Kuangyin became one of the "Ten Brothers of the Righteous Society" in his early years and served as the supreme commander of the Forbidden Army. The core military power was all in the hands of his cronies. The Chenqiao Mutiny was originally a "collective ascendancy" planned by this group of people. Wu Zetian was different. She "usurped the country of Li Tang by herself" and was a loner. The group of people in the court were left by Li Tang. The children of the Wu family were mediocre and incompetent and could not support the core power; Li Tang's old ministers loved Li Tang, but were forced to surrender; Er Zhang, whom he favored in his later years, had no real power, but intensified conflicts. She was never able to replace the "own group" of the old team. In other words, she has always been "a loner." She was able to become emperor only because of her own skills. As she aged and frail, her personal control over the court also declined. Wu Zetian had very tight control over the Forbidden Army in her early years, but in her later years due to serious illness and neglect, Zhang Jianzhi successfully instigated the rebellion against the Forbidden Army general Li Duozuo, directly losing the core military support, allowing the coup army to easily invade Xuanwu Gate. Returning to the topic of "personal team", in fact, Wu Zetian personally may not be unaware of the importance of this issue. In his later years, in order to maintain the rule of Wu and Zhou, he suppressed a group of old officials of Li and Tang. However, many of the Wu family's children were mediocre and incompetent, and could not form a stable political core. On the other hand, the core figures in the coup such as Zhang and Cambodia were mostly veterans of the Taizong and Gaozong periods. They had deep foundations and could respond to everything when launching a coup. Again, if you can call yourself emperor, you have already done a great job. But the more I understand, the more uncomfortable it becomes. If only we could do a little better, a little better... The first question is, how should she train her core team?

Is this article still updated? I've been reading it for 24 years.

Today in Dy, I was frightened by a feminist. (The traditional saying is Dapo Cult, but some people say it is an insult to women, so I changed it to another one) Feminists are really scary. They will label women as "mistresses" on their own initiative based on their own standards. After posting it, he sentenced them to death on behalf of the court, and he felt from the bottom of his heart that it was right. Even if the court imposes a death sentence, there is still a chance for "defense". Even if someone commits murder and betrays his country, he has the right to defend himself, but the "Wife's Rights Court" does not. Don't listen to the cause and effect, don't talk about the truth, don't care about the timeline, as long as someone is sentenced to be a mistress, that person deserves to die, and the murderer is just. What a terrible feminist

Can Jinjiang still use "God's milk", "Yiji" and "Mother"?