If the Voice Is Forgotten

I feel like the author is really angry about Yin Chu's long comment reply. In fact, I think her real intention is not to really pick on you, but to see how sharp an author can respond to critical comments. She never imagined that she would make you so angry, and she felt very guilty. Except for the first long review, the others are all tests for you. Therefore, those long reviews are not entirely true words based on facts. You can feel the arrogance in her words. She is happy because her goal was achieved. Because she tried many times and failed to get you to send a truly angry reply, she had no choice but to give her a strong dose of "if the two of you are together". Unexpectedly, you expressed your true thoughts. It's her own fault, and she personally doesn't want to be tolerated. In her eyes, in this case, it would be better for you to contradict her from the beginning, or even despise her. A girl like her who has sharp personal opinions has a habit when writing reviews - she will put a gun and a stick in the first review, and then use the author's reply to judge whether the author is worthy of close friendship. A very clumsy and even criticized method, right? But it works, because I've tried it too. Because she was not very good at distinguishing between her own feelings and those of others, she had to use more effective methods. You know, when people are angry, they will blurt out some words that are true but cannot be known. This is also known as "talking louder than thinking." Because she didn't know if this would happen when typing, she felt a little uneasy before seeing your reply. She must feel very guilty in her heart. After all, she said those words out of her respect and love for this work, but in a way that was a little too extreme. So if you don't like those comments, you can delete them as much as possible. So, author Sang, I'm really sorry!!!

Tsk, is it really too literary and profound? I actually don't understand TAT when I read it