I tried desperately to escape the ending that had been set for me, yet I couldn't avoid meeting you in the end. Under the pull of fate, history quietly slipped off its course.
This story follows a heroine who transmigrates into Bellatrix. She keeps trying to escape the fate laid out in the original story, but by a series of chance mishaps, she meets the very Voldemort she was determined to avoid. Without realizing it, she gradually gives him her heart. In the end, can two people who are both selfish and rational find their way to each other?
Dear readers, I've been putting this story off until today, but now I finally have to make it a paid novel. Thank you for your support over all this time. It should be completed at around 200,000 characters, and reading the whole thing will probably cost about 2 yuan. All I can promise now is that I won't abandon it, and that I'll maintain the quality and update regularly after it becomes paid. I hope I can continue to count on your support (bows).
I've started a new story about Ginny and the diary. I hope I can count on your support~~
Here's my profile. If you like my work, please follow me.
My new original romance, with parallel storylines set in the Republican era and the modern day. It has both angst and laughter. I hope you'll click in and take a look~~
Theme:
Merlin's Pants, a story written 12 years ago. When I was watching the movie, I felt that Bella was the kind of person who crazily criticizes beauties. Is she really crazy and paranoid? I felt like any one member of the Black family could tell a poignant story?
It was the first time I saw a fan of Lao Fu Shengli. It felt so strange, but the ending was very happy. Like
I just feel that the part when V has a child is very OOC. He grew up in an orphanage and was bullied there since he was a child. Will he like children? And he lacks love. Even if he has Bella, he still lacks love. Will he still have two children "standing" between him and Bella?
Never assign professors to big dogs
Is there any extra about the professor?
One book every two days is my highest record hahahahaha
Awesome, perfect ending
Wow! You can get around this! The author's thinking is so strong!
That's fine, everyone has their own happiness and no more regrets. In fact, the dispute between Dumbledore and V was never a racial dispute, but a struggle of interests under the banner of race. In fact, there is never really anyone who is right or wrong.
Lord Voldemort in My Eyes (Part 2)
"Harry Potter" is a children's fairy tale novel, and the story in the text is a pure battle between white and black. Harry, the righteous and passionate savior, Ron, a commoner who is not afraid of power, Hermione, a wise and strong helper, and Dumbledore, the embodiment of complete justice. These are positive characters and the protagonists of the article. The ferocious and violent ugly devil, the groveling and arrogant Death Eater, the wretched betrayer, these are the villains in the article and also cannon fodder. This is a standard fantasy novel in which justice defeats evil.
Not to mention the setting of the storyline, this book initially attracted countless adults and children. Now that there are many authors writing fanfics based on their love for the original characters, I gradually became aware of some things that were ignored when I first read the book.
Auntie Rolling has a strong hatred of the rich - this is a problem that I or we discovered when we confidently analyzed the original work. The nobles with a long heritage are only arrogant in the eyes of Aunt Zhuan, and there is no trace of the cunning and tact that nobles should have. In the eyes of Auntie Rolling, the British's world-famous elegant gentlemanly style has nothing left in the face of the wealth and status accumulated by the times. We don't know whether it was because of his wealth that he lost his proper demeanor in the eyes of Aunt Zhuan, leaving only his arrogant and arrogant side.
But in my opinion, Auntie Chuan's hatred of the rich is not as serious as usual. She ignored the cunning of a noble who grew up in conspiracies, and the double-dealing necessary for people in the upper class. The nobles in the original novel were either arrogant like Lucius, crazy and sharp like Bellatrix, or ignorant like the followers of the Malfoy family. Putting interests first is a characteristic of aristocrats. I admit that in fact this is also our characteristic. But in the original work, what happened to those people in the original novel who madly abandoned their self-respect and self-love for interests? Greedy and vicious, this is the face of the Death Eaters in Auntie Scroll's article. When I first started reading the original work, I always felt dismissive of these people, but now, I only feel a deep sadness.
The Order of the Phoenix is full of hardcore members who are willing to sacrifice everything for justice, while among the Death Eaters, except for the fanatical Baty Crouch and Bellatrix, the rest are basically just grassroots existences. It seems that friendship and loyalty have never been the makeup of the noble souls of Slytherin. Whose fault is it that they are missing that part?
From the first time I read the article, I sneered at Cryffindor's cheap friendship. The power was too cheap, too simple, and too easy to be influenced by the outside world. Only Harry, who has not felt warmth and care since childhood, would long for Cryffindor-like care. Although Slytherin said "Maybe you can make sincere friends here", most of the little snakes were abandoned by Auntie Rolling away from the existence of friendship. Draco, who was ridiculed by his two followers who were barely childhood sweethearts, and the former Slytherin prince who betrayed all his relatives, the Slytherin children's childhood, which was not originally innocent and beautiful, was painted with a bleak color by the rolling aunt.
Not to mention the nobles who were born with superior conditions, as for the biggest cannon fodder in the article - Lord Voldemort, our Highness the Dark Lord, you can feel the oppression that Auntie Rolling has had on the little snakes from the beginning. I don't know what Auntie Rolling was thinking when setting up the plot. As the biggest villain in the novel and the boss that the protagonist must defeat on his way forward, Auntie Rolling did not choose a noble among nobles with a good background and a high-end education since childhood to play the role. On the contrary, the current Lord Voldemort and the former Tom Riddle have nothing but a respected bloodline.
I am the Villain Boss Controller and I control the appearance, so I have had a deep affection for Voldemort from the very beginning. As I grow older and more experienced, this favorable impression has not weakened, but has become stronger and stronger. In the first few parts of the original novel, I only saw a cruel and unpopular Dark Lord. Even his name was feared by people. Even after he disappeared for ten years, they did not even dare to mention it. This fear also spread smoothly to the next generation. It can be said that except for his demeanor of possessing a snake and enduring ten years in the dark virgin forest, he has almost no redeeming qualities. However, after reading Dumbledore's memories of Voldemort, I began to feel sorry for him.
Yes, I feel worthless for him. Tom Riddle was born in 1927, just in time for the Great Depression that swept the entire capitalist world. Even today, we cannot say that every orphan in all orphanages is living well, let alone an era when even adults could not feed themselves. He was actually very lucky, at least he managed to survive and survived in that era of lack of supplies. But it is precisely because he successfully survived that he admires strength and longs for rebirth more than anyone else. Just like his name "Voldemort" flies away from death, but is always in the shadow of death.
From his life in the orphanage, he learned to use strength to suppress others and gave him enough supplies to survive. He learned to please others, which allowed him to get more from the nuns. Disguise and the desire for power have almost become his instinct. For the first time, he tried to accept it and show his true self, but what he got was a humiliating lesson from Dumbledore. In this way, he also strengthened his determination to control powerful power.
He is smart and can master all magics as soon as he gets started; he is strong and has grown from nothing to being respected by everyone in the complex Slytherin; he is tolerant and can sleep alone in the primeval forest for ten years with no one but no ghosts; he knows the current affairs and pleases others cautiously but not humbly before his wings are full; he is far-sighted and firmly grasps the psychology of the nobles and proposes goals that make people move; he is charming and can persuade those cunning and wise nobles to work for him. He has all the qualities a successful person should have, and is even better than most of them. If he were in China, he would be a world-famous king and an inspiring role model in textbooks, but he is just cannon fodder like a clown in the original work.
From a boy with nothing to the leader of the nobility, he took one step after another cautiously and extremely boldly. Cautiousness, cunning, and suspicion have become his habits and something ingrained into his bones. But Tom, who was only sixteen years old, tore his soul apart without any doubt. His tragic life began.
Not to mention how the "Horcrux" that many nobles had never heard of was learned about by Tom in school, and why the Potions Professor happened to know the existence of the "Horcrux" (please forgive my impure mind for doubting this coincidence), just because he tore his own soul so casually without verification, I can't imagine how that outstanding young man persuaded the cunning and cunning nobles to work for him.
From glory to decline, it's just a matter of Auntie Rolling's thoughts. In this moment, his intelligence, tolerance, and strength all became the stepping stones for him to become the crazy villain Boss and the savior.
Harry's childhood experience is the object of pity from others, and Voldemort's miserable childhood is the basis for others to affirm his cruelty. Is this an acceptable favoritism for the protagonist, or is it an inheritance of JK's resentment towards Slytherin, the aristocratic academy? My heart aches for them, for the unequal treatment, and for the incomprehensible looks from others, even if they don't need it. Real Slytherins don't need the sympathy and pity of others. No matter how deeply hurt they are, they will stand up straighter in the eyes of others' suspicion and rejection. Although, their pride became an excuse for them to be hurt.
The superior innate conditions of the nobles have become the reason why they are hated, and their efforts in glory are ignored by others. As for Voldemort, who came from a humble background, his success came entirely from his own efforts, but obviously, success itself was the beginning of disaster. When all the soul pieces and main souls were dramatically wiped out by the savior, the farce finally ended. At this moment, the elite education that those failed nobles had received since childhood seemed like a joke, and Voldemort's efforts and sacrifices were the joke within the joke.
Cryffindor won, Slytherin failed. Harry, the savior who couldn't even master spells, defeated the talented Voldemort. "Weapon of You" defeated "Avatar". I was no longer innocent and I just felt deeply tired. This was like a farce. And then the farce finally ended.
I heard someone say, "JK's writing is full of bugs, and Slytherin is a big sieve, full of holes." Was it those incomprehensible bugs that caused the appearance of the ferocious and cruel brainless Voldemort, or was it the author's inadvertent partiality?
Her congenitally favorable living conditions and good family background were rejected by JK; her acquired efforts and success achieved through unremitting struggle were destroyed by JK. What she finally chose was the success of a savior who represented justice and did not put in much effort. But in reality, is there really such absolute justice and such success? Even, in my eyes, the justice that Harry and the others represent is just a manifestation of one party's interests.
(PS: There are typos, please imagine the correct ones. I really don't want to fix it, and I felt so panicked after I finished writing it.)
I thought the professor's CP was Sirius. . . . . . . . . . . .
Merlin's Pants, a story written 12 years ago. When I was watching the movie, I felt that Bella was the kind of person who crazily criticizes beauties. Is she really crazy and paranoid? I felt like any one member of the Black family could tell a poignant story?
It was the first time I saw a fan of Lao Fu Shengli. It felt so strange, but the ending was very happy. Like
I just feel that the part when V has a child is very OOC. He grew up in an orphanage and was bullied there since he was a child. Will he like children? And he lacks love. Even if he has Bella, he still lacks love. Will he still have two children "standing" between him and Bella?
Never assign professors to big dogs Is there any extra about the professor?
One book every two days is my highest record hahahahaha
Awesome, perfect ending
Wow! You can get around this! The author's thinking is so strong!
That's fine, everyone has their own happiness and no more regrets. In fact, the dispute between Dumbledore and V was never a racial dispute, but a struggle of interests under the banner of race. In fact, there is never really anyone who is right or wrong.
Lord Voldemort in My Eyes (Part 2) "Harry Potter" is a children's fairy tale novel, and the story in the text is a pure battle between white and black. Harry, the righteous and passionate savior, Ron, a commoner who is not afraid of power, Hermione, a wise and strong helper, and Dumbledore, the embodiment of complete justice. These are positive characters and the protagonists of the article. The ferocious and violent ugly devil, the groveling and arrogant Death Eater, the wretched betrayer, these are the villains in the article and also cannon fodder. This is a standard fantasy novel in which justice defeats evil. Not to mention the setting of the storyline, this book initially attracted countless adults and children. Now that there are many authors writing fanfics based on their love for the original characters, I gradually became aware of some things that were ignored when I first read the book. Auntie Rolling has a strong hatred of the rich - this is a problem that I or we discovered when we confidently analyzed the original work. The nobles with a long heritage are only arrogant in the eyes of Aunt Zhuan, and there is no trace of the cunning and tact that nobles should have. In the eyes of Auntie Rolling, the British's world-famous elegant gentlemanly style has nothing left in the face of the wealth and status accumulated by the times. We don't know whether it was because of his wealth that he lost his proper demeanor in the eyes of Aunt Zhuan, leaving only his arrogant and arrogant side. But in my opinion, Auntie Chuan's hatred of the rich is not as serious as usual. She ignored the cunning of a noble who grew up in conspiracies, and the double-dealing necessary for people in the upper class. The nobles in the original novel were either arrogant like Lucius, crazy and sharp like Bellatrix, or ignorant like the followers of the Malfoy family. Putting interests first is a characteristic of aristocrats. I admit that in fact this is also our characteristic. But in the original work, what happened to those people in the original novel who madly abandoned their self-respect and self-love for interests? Greedy and vicious, this is the face of the Death Eaters in Auntie Scroll's article. When I first started reading the original work, I always felt dismissive of these people, but now, I only feel a deep sadness. The Order of the Phoenix is full of hardcore members who are willing to sacrifice everything for justice, while among the Death Eaters, except for the fanatical Baty Crouch and Bellatrix, the rest are basically just grassroots existences. It seems that friendship and loyalty have never been the makeup of the noble souls of Slytherin. Whose fault is it that they are missing that part? From the first time I read the article, I sneered at Cryffindor's cheap friendship. The power was too cheap, too simple, and too easy to be influenced by the outside world. Only Harry, who has not felt warmth and care since childhood, would long for Cryffindor-like care. Although Slytherin said "Maybe you can make sincere friends here", most of the little snakes were abandoned by Auntie Rolling away from the existence of friendship. Draco, who was ridiculed by his two followers who were barely childhood sweethearts, and the former Slytherin prince who betrayed all his relatives, the Slytherin children's childhood, which was not originally innocent and beautiful, was painted with a bleak color by the rolling aunt. Not to mention the nobles who were born with superior conditions, as for the biggest cannon fodder in the article - Lord Voldemort, our Highness the Dark Lord, you can feel the oppression that Auntie Rolling has had on the little snakes from the beginning. I don't know what Auntie Rolling was thinking when setting up the plot. As the biggest villain in the novel and the boss that the protagonist must defeat on his way forward, Auntie Rolling did not choose a noble among nobles with a good background and a high-end education since childhood to play the role. On the contrary, the current Lord Voldemort and the former Tom Riddle have nothing but a respected bloodline. I am the Villain Boss Controller and I control the appearance, so I have had a deep affection for Voldemort from the very beginning. As I grow older and more experienced, this favorable impression has not weakened, but has become stronger and stronger. In the first few parts of the original novel, I only saw a cruel and unpopular Dark Lord. Even his name was feared by people. Even after he disappeared for ten years, they did not even dare to mention it. This fear also spread smoothly to the next generation. It can be said that except for his demeanor of possessing a snake and enduring ten years in the dark virgin forest, he has almost no redeeming qualities. However, after reading Dumbledore's memories of Voldemort, I began to feel sorry for him. Yes, I feel worthless for him. Tom Riddle was born in 1927, just in time for the Great Depression that swept the entire capitalist world. Even today, we cannot say that every orphan in all orphanages is living well, let alone an era when even adults could not feed themselves. He was actually very lucky, at least he managed to survive and survived in that era of lack of supplies. But it is precisely because he successfully survived that he admires strength and longs for rebirth more than anyone else. Just like his name "Voldemort" flies away from death, but is always in the shadow of death. From his life in the orphanage, he learned to use strength to suppress others and gave him enough supplies to survive. He learned to please others, which allowed him to get more from the nuns. Disguise and the desire for power have almost become his instinct. For the first time, he tried to accept it and show his true self, but what he got was a humiliating lesson from Dumbledore. In this way, he also strengthened his determination to control powerful power. He is smart and can master all magics as soon as he gets started; he is strong and has grown from nothing to being respected by everyone in the complex Slytherin; he is tolerant and can sleep alone in the primeval forest for ten years with no one but no ghosts; he knows the current affairs and pleases others cautiously but not humbly before his wings are full; he is far-sighted and firmly grasps the psychology of the nobles and proposes goals that make people move; he is charming and can persuade those cunning and wise nobles to work for him. He has all the qualities a successful person should have, and is even better than most of them. If he were in China, he would be a world-famous king and an inspiring role model in textbooks, but he is just cannon fodder like a clown in the original work. From a boy with nothing to the leader of the nobility, he took one step after another cautiously and extremely boldly. Cautiousness, cunning, and suspicion have become his habits and something ingrained into his bones. But Tom, who was only sixteen years old, tore his soul apart without any doubt. His tragic life began. Not to mention how the "Horcrux" that many nobles had never heard of was learned about by Tom in school, and why the Potions Professor happened to know the existence of the "Horcrux" (please forgive my impure mind for doubting this coincidence), just because he tore his own soul so casually without verification, I can't imagine how that outstanding young man persuaded the cunning and cunning nobles to work for him. From glory to decline, it's just a matter of Auntie Rolling's thoughts. In this moment, his intelligence, tolerance, and strength all became the stepping stones for him to become the crazy villain Boss and the savior. Harry's childhood experience is the object of pity from others, and Voldemort's miserable childhood is the basis for others to affirm his cruelty. Is this an acceptable favoritism for the protagonist, or is it an inheritance of JK's resentment towards Slytherin, the aristocratic academy? My heart aches for them, for the unequal treatment, and for the incomprehensible looks from others, even if they don't need it. Real Slytherins don't need the sympathy and pity of others. No matter how deeply hurt they are, they will stand up straighter in the eyes of others' suspicion and rejection. Although, their pride became an excuse for them to be hurt. The superior innate conditions of the nobles have become the reason why they are hated, and their efforts in glory are ignored by others. As for Voldemort, who came from a humble background, his success came entirely from his own efforts, but obviously, success itself was the beginning of disaster. When all the soul pieces and main souls were dramatically wiped out by the savior, the farce finally ended. At this moment, the elite education that those failed nobles had received since childhood seemed like a joke, and Voldemort's efforts and sacrifices were the joke within the joke. Cryffindor won, Slytherin failed. Harry, the savior who couldn't even master spells, defeated the talented Voldemort. "Weapon of You" defeated "Avatar". I was no longer innocent and I just felt deeply tired. This was like a farce. And then the farce finally ended. I heard someone say, "JK's writing is full of bugs, and Slytherin is a big sieve, full of holes." Was it those incomprehensible bugs that caused the appearance of the ferocious and cruel brainless Voldemort, or was it the author's inadvertent partiality? Her congenitally favorable living conditions and good family background were rejected by JK; her acquired efforts and success achieved through unremitting struggle were destroyed by JK. What she finally chose was the success of a savior who represented justice and did not put in much effort. But in reality, is there really such absolute justice and such success? Even, in my eyes, the justice that Harry and the others represent is just a manifestation of one party's interests. (PS: There are typos, please imagine the correct ones. I really don't want to fix it, and I felt so panicked after I finished writing it.)
I thought the professor's CP was Sirius. . . . . . . . . . . .