Preview

As far as I'm concerned, The first version is indeed better, and the ending makes readers want to read on, but it is obvious that this kind of beginning is a test of skill. It is necessary not only to ensure that no one is OOC in the brain battle (and other conflicts) among a group of strong people, but also to preserve the protagonist's strong character and not let him stretch his hips too much. In the beginning, which is a relatively important period of attracting customers, if the plot is well told, it will be NB, but if it is not well told, it will be a pity. I personally think that the second version is the most undesired version among the three versions. It has a whole chapter of foreshadowing and no antecedents. Unless the settings are quickly completed later, it will be meaningless (to be honest, I didn't know that the dog was the protagonist before I saw the ending. I thought he was a passerby who was forced to unlock new abilities due to the protagonist's power... Yes, I thought that the enemy the dog faced was the protagonist. This was a side foil) And it may correspondingly reduce the number of readers who don't read Hunter, because if they are not interested at the beginning, they will not understand it in depth. This concern will not be there in the first edition. The third version has a very satisfactory beginning, with no mistakes and is concise and clear with a lot of laughter. It is a very standard beginning of a derivative article. The antecedents have also been explained. This kind of beginning relies heavily on the interest of the subsequent plot, because it is very ordinary. And just like the second edition, there are fewer readers who are not interested in looking at hunters. Above

So half a year has passed, when can we see Wen Ya?

I really like the first version. The beginning of the first version has a lofty feeling, and there is an inexplicable feeling like a round table roll call in the summons. To be honest, if the sentence structure becomes the kind of sentence with a strong rhyming rhythm, it may be ignited [jpg added for the strange ignition points.] However, the structure of the first version is too big and it is easy to lose control, so if you want to write more relaxedly, I personally think the first version is not suitable. The second version (the one with the dancing one) has more laughs and distinct characteristics of the Happy Fountain. You can tell at a glance that it is a big text, and the opening plot line is relatively simple, and the pace is not too fast, but the main line is not very clear. Ps. Of course, this is the first chapter, so you don't have to jump in so quickly. So the second version is more suitable for the classification of simple cookies. The third version is relatively average. The element of joy also has a relatively clear small goal, and the plot purpose can also be roughly written. If we want to use metaphors, the first version is like a social animal, the second version is like a tourist on a journey, and the third version is like a child who is still in school [jpg added for weird metaphors.] In short, that's it. These three editions all have their own merits. You can start with any one, but of course I still like the first edition the most (?>ω<*?)

The first version of the Tiankeng opening was difficult to write. In comparison, the second version explains more about the background of the protagonist. We know that the protagonist is reincarnated into a god from another world (haha, reincarnation into another world is so popular in Japanese comics now), and the protagonist is an ordinary person at the beginning. In short, it is recommended to start with the second edition. There is no need to waste the Sanmao dancing plot in the third edition. It can be used directly as the beginning of the second chapter.

Half a year has almost passed (crying)

I feel that both the first and second editions are quite good, and I am very excited about it. However, I feel that the first edition is quite difficult to write, so it will be easier to develop the second edition.

The first version felt a bit difficult to write. Later, the main reason was that the people summoned felt difficult to control. I mean the character description, especially the hanging man. Mr. Sen, Qi Shen, and 5t5 have relatively distinct personalities.

Moreover, I feel like Sanmao will be killed soon if there is a problem...

Wuwuwuwu, author, I am going to college. I really want to see you publish a new article in 2022, waiting for you!!! There's no need to put a lot of pressure on it, just write whatever you want!

The university notification letters have come out. My favorite author has not yet written a QAQ article.