People often say that Sybil de Pedrigo is a sycophant. She comes from a noble family. By blood, her father was a cousin of the king who had already been sent to the guillotine. Because of her congenital disability, she was stripped of her right to inherit, and at fifteen she was sent to study at a seminary.
Although she couldn't enjoy the pleasures of the secular nobility, she was fortunate that, after graduating, her family's influence helped her become the abbess of Saint Barry Abbey in Velen at the age of twenty, with an annual salary of eighteen thousand gold ducats. That was enough to hire more than fifty servants to wait on her.
Unfortunately, when Sybil turned twenty-one, revolution broke out!
P.S. This novel, including all names, characters, events, and occurrences, is entirely fictional. Unless explicitly identified as a famous quote, fairy tale, fable, or historical story, any resemblance is purely coincidental. In addition, the content of this work is created solely to serve the story and does not represent the author's endorsement or encouragement of any position depicted herein.
Theme: Draw wisdom from the lessons of history, learn from the past, and move toward a better future.
When people are alive, they have already tried their best, so I often feel that if you want to pursue other things, do your best without worrying about the results, and letting yourself go is just a small corner of comfort. Don't embarrass yourself unless necessary. I said before that time is like a grain of sand for all of us, but there is another saying in Buddha's saying: a grain of sand is a world, a leaf is a Bodhi. Measured by years, we may not have much weight, but in our own world, we hold the power of life and death. This is not inconsistent with it. I often read some articles that have been abandoned for a long time, just because the characters in the articles are very vivid. The life and death of the ending does not represent the life and death of the characters in the readers' hearts. Maybe after many years, I will still remember these two women with extremely distinctive personalities. They are really great. I once read an article that impressed me, but it only has more than 2,000 collections. I wondered why the article with such a good plot was not popular. After thinking about it, it was probably because the plot was too confusing and there was no big fish or meat. Some people said that in Lily Writing about machinations and Western fantasy is asking for trouble. I have been reading articles for many years, and indeed I rarely see such articles that I like. So when I encounter them, I would like to sincerely thank you, the author, and I wish you all the best no matter what your future choices are!
Following along, although there are indeed some parts that I find difficult (mainly because I can't calm down to read or watch things now), overall I think it is a very different article on Lily Channel, with a grand view of history, and the protagonist appears real and vivid in history. I personally very much welcome this different style. I think most of us are ordinary and do not have a magnificent life. Most of us will live like useless people. We can occasionally deny ourselves and then know that we are just one of the many living beings. Since we are here in the world, let's treat it as an experience. Because I only play Baihe channels, I don't know if I will have the opportunity to interact with the author in the future. I wish the author can slowly accept ordinary life and enjoy this experience occasionally. Thank you, the author~
Yes, Sybil's bad taste, her occasional shyness, and the poor Emperor, hahahaha, beautiful love is really joyful!
As long as society exists, there will always be class contradictions; government machinery is always a tool used to maintain rule, and it is a naive illusion to expect it to operate without hurting people.
Throwed it in the wrong place, put it again.
I am just an ordinary senior high school student. The only thing similar to the author, apart from being a liberal arts student, is a little bit of stubbornness and stubbornness. I like history, very much, (even knowing that the future of liberal arts is bleak, I still choose essays. I can study science, but I want to fight and challenge this unfair rule). When I realized it, I had already read the history book. Therefore, when I saw the title "The Crown of History" at the end of the fictional history rankings, my interest was aroused. You know, in the gl circle, no matter whether it is modern or ancient background, there is always a setting of emotional flow between the eldest princess and the fake prince-in-law, or the general, let alone the Qianyuan who can give birth to children. They are so common, they have already become successful examples, everyone is following them, and no one has new ideas. This book is an exception, not to mention where did it come from with the courage to give such a name, and where did it get the honor to get comments about why I didn't read it earlier. So I read it. Even though I had difficulties and incomprehension during the reading process (that is, too much speculation and an unsuitable language style), I couldn't help but feel a little funny that I studied in class during the day and read a novel at night when I went home and thought about looking up information to understand. But I still finished reading it. Because of the name, the comments, and the reluctance that I might never encounter such an article again, I persevered, and I really gained something. (It's a bit long-winded), from not liking injustice at the beginning, to that damn religion, from the Foncharia referendum to Roman's real estate vote, I have gained something of my own, and I feel that my time is worth it.
The next part seems to be my thoughts on the whole story, on Deran and Sybil, but I don't want to say more, it's a bit of a rogue but not without reason. First, I feel that other people's comments about them and the story itself are enough, and I don't have much need to add; second, Deran's historical mission was completed with her life, Sybil's mission was completed with the rest of her life, and my mission (given that I cried and had insomnia until three o'clock the night after reading it, and had to get up at six o'clock the next day to go to school, I think I should (The mission of reviewing) has been almost completed, so I don't want to go into details; the third is that I asked AI about something I didn't quite understand, and its answer satisfied me, but I also don't want to attach a perfunctory AI answer to a work that shines with human thought, and there are a thousand Hamlets for a thousand readers, and unique understanding is rare, so I won't go into it.
In addition, I am really happy that the author has not given up. In this damn fast-paced era, where everyone is pursuing happy emotions, having more leverage and more thoughtfulness will be a great comfort to every thinker caught in this era. I hope to see such good works again (of course it would be better if the flaws are improved)
Of course, I'm scared to post such a comment, and I'm afraid I won't like it, not to mention it's my first long comment (really?), But you have to give the first time a chance, right? So I should post it anyway, and I should write it if I should write it.
Seeing this, I asked myself again: Why did I only see such an article today? But after thinking about it, I don't have the patience to read it all now. I'm afraid I couldn't stand it at all before. Although this makes me look like Vidor and Derain in the article compared to the long reviewers, it also means that I can discover more and dig more every time I revisit it.
By the way, I saw that this article was completed two years ago, and other articles in the author's column have also been locked. It is really a pity. To be honest, the GL articles in recent years have become more and more rigid or stereotyped (in my personal taste). At this time, I can still find your article. This article is really a blessing. Thank you to the author for your contribution. Your writing and thinking logic make me fall in love. At this point, the partition type is no longer important. If you are still willing to write, I ask you to leave some clues and give me a chance to follow the clues.
Thank you again, and your great work!
Although it is very late, maybe the author will not see it, but I still want to say: the author wrote so well!
I must have collected this book a long time ago. I stopped at that time because I didn't want to catch up on updates. A few days ago, I was looking through my favorites and found it that had been gathering dust. I was indirectly attracted to it again, and I stayed up all night and spent four or five days reading it. I was quite touched. Compared to the ending of Chapter 171, I prefer Delan's death in Chapter 172, which has a more historical feel. Plague, high fever, overwork, and forced marches. When I was reading, I was really worried that Delan would die suddenly, but in the end I was afraid that she would not die in her prime. On the one hand, it is because in the 16th century when antibiotics were not yet discovered, it was really easy for people to die from bacteria; on the other hand, because even now, when medical treatment is relatively developed, there are a lot of people who died of overwork in the financial circle. What reason does Delan, a person in the 16th century, have to be an exception? I personally feel that her death sublimated this article, giving it a sense of historical heaviness and destiny rather than the nihilism of a novel; it is as if there is a time and space parallel to ours, in the 16th century a destined person - Delan - was born. She was destined to establish an authoritarian and democratic country, and then die after completing her historical mission.
As for the problem that some people complain about the difficulty of remembering the names of Westerners, I have never experienced it; I personally think that some people's question about not looking at Western backgrounds has nothing to do with the names of the people. It may be because they lack a sense of substitution and comment. This may be related to the historical cultivation of most people. Even for people who are illiterate in history, I believe that most people still have some understanding of the major events and important systems in our country's ancient history; but they may know nothing or only a little about Western history. After all, what we call Western background refers specifically to Western Europe, and its history is very confusing. It is easy to get confused (such as the Hundred Years War between England and France, such as some throne succession relationships), and it should be difficult for ordinary people who are not specialized in history to figure it out - because they don't know, they may not have a sense of involvement, and then they will not have the confidence to comment on what the author has written. I personally don't believe it is because of the name. After all, even if the story is set in an ancient Chinese group portrait novel, few people can immediately realize that this person has appeared in the previous article, including his background. As for the place names and rivers, let alone the names of places and rivers - I believe that even now not everyone can smoothly name the names of all provinces and provincial capitals of the People's Republic of China. All in all, I mean, there's not much difference between a Western setting and an Eastern setting.
According to the content of the full text and what the author of Chapter 172 has to say, I personally think that the author is a thoughtful person who wants to express some thoughts. If the author hopes to find and express his personal life value and meaning through writing, maybe the author can try a non-CP female protagonist article (it would be better if there is a classification of unclear CP articles).
Sometimes I feel that the biggest disadvantage of having so many kingdoms is that I don't know which pig will take the throne at any time.
Even though the two of them shine in their respective fields and are decisive in killing, they still carefully reserve a soft habitat for each other, which can be called iron-hearted tenderness.
However, there are some words that are not spoken quickly, and the dialogues and inner activities written by the author are sometimes a bit lengthy, resulting in a sense of jumping from novels to speculative prose.
When people are alive, they have already tried their best, so I often feel that if you want to pursue other things, do your best without worrying about the results, and letting yourself go is just a small corner of comfort. Don't embarrass yourself unless necessary. I said before that time is like a grain of sand for all of us, but there is another saying in Buddha's saying: a grain of sand is a world, a leaf is a Bodhi. Measured by years, we may not have much weight, but in our own world, we hold the power of life and death. This is not inconsistent with it. I often read some articles that have been abandoned for a long time, just because the characters in the articles are very vivid. The life and death of the ending does not represent the life and death of the characters in the readers' hearts. Maybe after many years, I will still remember these two women with extremely distinctive personalities. They are really great. I once read an article that impressed me, but it only has more than 2,000 collections. I wondered why the article with such a good plot was not popular. After thinking about it, it was probably because the plot was too confusing and there was no big fish or meat. Some people said that in Lily Writing about machinations and Western fantasy is asking for trouble. I have been reading articles for many years, and indeed I rarely see such articles that I like. So when I encounter them, I would like to sincerely thank you, the author, and I wish you all the best no matter what your future choices are!
Following along, although there are indeed some parts that I find difficult (mainly because I can't calm down to read or watch things now), overall I think it is a very different article on Lily Channel, with a grand view of history, and the protagonist appears real and vivid in history. I personally very much welcome this different style. I think most of us are ordinary and do not have a magnificent life. Most of us will live like useless people. We can occasionally deny ourselves and then know that we are just one of the many living beings. Since we are here in the world, let's treat it as an experience. Because I only play Baihe channels, I don't know if I will have the opportunity to interact with the author in the future. I wish the author can slowly accept ordinary life and enjoy this experience occasionally. Thank you, the author~
Yes, Sybil's bad taste, her occasional shyness, and the poor Emperor, hahahaha, beautiful love is really joyful!
As long as society exists, there will always be class contradictions; government machinery is always a tool used to maintain rule, and it is a naive illusion to expect it to operate without hurting people.
Throwed it in the wrong place, put it again. I am just an ordinary senior high school student. The only thing similar to the author, apart from being a liberal arts student, is a little bit of stubbornness and stubbornness. I like history, very much, (even knowing that the future of liberal arts is bleak, I still choose essays. I can study science, but I want to fight and challenge this unfair rule). When I realized it, I had already read the history book. Therefore, when I saw the title "The Crown of History" at the end of the fictional history rankings, my interest was aroused. You know, in the gl circle, no matter whether it is modern or ancient background, there is always a setting of emotional flow between the eldest princess and the fake prince-in-law, or the general, let alone the Qianyuan who can give birth to children. They are so common, they have already become successful examples, everyone is following them, and no one has new ideas. This book is an exception, not to mention where did it come from with the courage to give such a name, and where did it get the honor to get comments about why I didn't read it earlier. So I read it. Even though I had difficulties and incomprehension during the reading process (that is, too much speculation and an unsuitable language style), I couldn't help but feel a little funny that I studied in class during the day and read a novel at night when I went home and thought about looking up information to understand. But I still finished reading it. Because of the name, the comments, and the reluctance that I might never encounter such an article again, I persevered, and I really gained something. (It's a bit long-winded), from not liking injustice at the beginning, to that damn religion, from the Foncharia referendum to Roman's real estate vote, I have gained something of my own, and I feel that my time is worth it. The next part seems to be my thoughts on the whole story, on Deran and Sybil, but I don't want to say more, it's a bit of a rogue but not without reason. First, I feel that other people's comments about them and the story itself are enough, and I don't have much need to add; second, Deran's historical mission was completed with her life, Sybil's mission was completed with the rest of her life, and my mission (given that I cried and had insomnia until three o'clock the night after reading it, and had to get up at six o'clock the next day to go to school, I think I should (The mission of reviewing) has been almost completed, so I don't want to go into details; the third is that I asked AI about something I didn't quite understand, and its answer satisfied me, but I also don't want to attach a perfunctory AI answer to a work that shines with human thought, and there are a thousand Hamlets for a thousand readers, and unique understanding is rare, so I won't go into it. In addition, I am really happy that the author has not given up. In this damn fast-paced era, where everyone is pursuing happy emotions, having more leverage and more thoughtfulness will be a great comfort to every thinker caught in this era. I hope to see such good works again (of course it would be better if the flaws are improved) Of course, I'm scared to post such a comment, and I'm afraid I won't like it, not to mention it's my first long comment (really?), But you have to give the first time a chance, right? So I should post it anyway, and I should write it if I should write it.
Seeing this, I asked myself again: Why did I only see such an article today? But after thinking about it, I don't have the patience to read it all now. I'm afraid I couldn't stand it at all before. Although this makes me look like Vidor and Derain in the article compared to the long reviewers, it also means that I can discover more and dig more every time I revisit it. By the way, I saw that this article was completed two years ago, and other articles in the author's column have also been locked. It is really a pity. To be honest, the GL articles in recent years have become more and more rigid or stereotyped (in my personal taste). At this time, I can still find your article. This article is really a blessing. Thank you to the author for your contribution. Your writing and thinking logic make me fall in love. At this point, the partition type is no longer important. If you are still willing to write, I ask you to leave some clues and give me a chance to follow the clues. Thank you again, and your great work!
Although it is very late, maybe the author will not see it, but I still want to say: the author wrote so well! I must have collected this book a long time ago. I stopped at that time because I didn't want to catch up on updates. A few days ago, I was looking through my favorites and found it that had been gathering dust. I was indirectly attracted to it again, and I stayed up all night and spent four or five days reading it. I was quite touched. Compared to the ending of Chapter 171, I prefer Delan's death in Chapter 172, which has a more historical feel. Plague, high fever, overwork, and forced marches. When I was reading, I was really worried that Delan would die suddenly, but in the end I was afraid that she would not die in her prime. On the one hand, it is because in the 16th century when antibiotics were not yet discovered, it was really easy for people to die from bacteria; on the other hand, because even now, when medical treatment is relatively developed, there are a lot of people who died of overwork in the financial circle. What reason does Delan, a person in the 16th century, have to be an exception? I personally feel that her death sublimated this article, giving it a sense of historical heaviness and destiny rather than the nihilism of a novel; it is as if there is a time and space parallel to ours, in the 16th century a destined person - Delan - was born. She was destined to establish an authoritarian and democratic country, and then die after completing her historical mission. As for the problem that some people complain about the difficulty of remembering the names of Westerners, I have never experienced it; I personally think that some people's question about not looking at Western backgrounds has nothing to do with the names of the people. It may be because they lack a sense of substitution and comment. This may be related to the historical cultivation of most people. Even for people who are illiterate in history, I believe that most people still have some understanding of the major events and important systems in our country's ancient history; but they may know nothing or only a little about Western history. After all, what we call Western background refers specifically to Western Europe, and its history is very confusing. It is easy to get confused (such as the Hundred Years War between England and France, such as some throne succession relationships), and it should be difficult for ordinary people who are not specialized in history to figure it out - because they don't know, they may not have a sense of involvement, and then they will not have the confidence to comment on what the author has written. I personally don't believe it is because of the name. After all, even if the story is set in an ancient Chinese group portrait novel, few people can immediately realize that this person has appeared in the previous article, including his background. As for the place names and rivers, let alone the names of places and rivers - I believe that even now not everyone can smoothly name the names of all provinces and provincial capitals of the People's Republic of China. All in all, I mean, there's not much difference between a Western setting and an Eastern setting. According to the content of the full text and what the author of Chapter 172 has to say, I personally think that the author is a thoughtful person who wants to express some thoughts. If the author hopes to find and express his personal life value and meaning through writing, maybe the author can try a non-CP female protagonist article (it would be better if there is a classification of unclear CP articles).
Sometimes I feel that the biggest disadvantage of having so many kingdoms is that I don't know which pig will take the throne at any time.
Even though the two of them shine in their respective fields and are decisive in killing, they still carefully reserve a soft habitat for each other, which can be called iron-hearted tenderness.
However, there are some words that are not spoken quickly, and the dialogues and inner activities written by the author are sometimes a bit lengthy, resulting in a sense of jumping from novels to speculative prose.