Transmigrate into Harry Potter: I Am Draco Malfoy

A en GABADE~~~!!!

GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOO

In this article, I am DH/HD!!!

It seems that BZ has an idea for little D... = = By the way, I firmly support DH or HD!!!_+

This article is GJ!!! Although Little D has become more considerate, he is still as arrogant as the original. The character has not lost shape and is more vivid~~~~ Super GJ!!! [Thumbs up]

Both DH and HD are supported!!! However, judging from the way Little H is treated in this article, HD has no hope. = =

Yeah Is that gone?

Ah um Come on big

That Pippi classmate, do you need to keep attacking others like this?" Even if you don't like Slytherin or Big V, "Those who like Voldemort really can't understand! What's so good about that evil slicer with psoriasis?" "What's good about V being that perverted slicer?" But don't you think you're going too far when you say that? Even if we don't like Harry, we're not saying he's a pervert or anything! Or maybe you don't like Big V just because he was later disfigured and turned into a snake face, so you like Harry's face. This behavior of belittling a character you hate and elevating a character you like is too childish. Even if the late-stage V-Da is indeed a bit stupid, you can't deny the greatness of the main soul V-Da in the early stage. Otherwise, how could he have so many people following him? With strength alone, it would be impossible to get those nobles to follow him. And just like what you said to Yaoyao, "If it were you, you would do worse." So if you were in a position with a large V, would you be able to do better? In that kind of dark forest, you can possess a snake and survive by eating mice, bugs, etc., And it's still as long as 11 years. Can you do it? Can you persevere? Even Harry, whom you like, can't do it! If one were to sympathize with Harry when he was a child, there were many more bad people who had been abused since he was a child than Harry. Especially among Slytherins, V and Professor, who didn't have a worse childhood than Harry. Didn't say anything. Moreover, the divisions between the four previous houses were not that serious. The relationship between Slytherin and the other three houses was only divided after Dumbledore took office. And since Harry entered Hogwarts, hasn't he been causing trouble every day? While the people in Slytherin were working hard to earn points for their own house, what was Harry doing, "thinking about how to deduct points for his own house?" In the end, they were given so many points just because of the Philosopher's Stone. Why did Dumbledore have to deny all Slytherin's efforts over the past year with just one sentence, just because he was the principal? And as the principal, shouldn't Dumbledore try to make good relations between the various colleges? But they allowed the other three houses to treat Slytherin unfairly. Don't forget that when we first entered school, we were all 11-year-old brats. Even the Slytherin nobles were just a group of children who had never left their parents. Doesn't anyone think this behavior is excessive? Especially Ron, keep your mouth shut, you are a child of a Death Eater, you are an evil wizard, your whole family should be in Azkaban. I think no matter who you put this kind of thing on, they will not look good on them. And Xiaolong didn't laugh at him at first, he was the one who made rude remarks to Xiaolong first. Can such a vicious person be forgiven just because he is a Gryffindor? It is undeniable that the Gryffindor of thousands of years ago may be worthy of respect, but the Gryffindor that was indulged by Dumbledore has nothing to do with courage. It is just foolhardy. Even after thousands of years of changes, Slytherin's original characteristics are no longer so obvious, and they are much stronger than the fake and fragile friendship of Gryffindor. Today, they can be friends with you, but tomorrow they may stab you in the back due to jealousy or the like. Even the loyal and upright Hufflepuff is much better than Gryffindor Perhaps Dumbledore was a successful politician, but he was a failed professor and principal. After the conflict between him and Grindelwald happened, he felt that ambitious children were bad, just like Big V. Of course, that doesn't mean that Big V became like that only because of Dumbledore. If TOM's personality wasn't so extreme, he wouldn't be able to become a big V. And there was no evidence to prove that the person who killed Dumbledore's sister was Greenwald! Each of the three people present at the time was suspected. If you use a pensieve, you can easily understand it! Aren't Gryffindors very courageous?" Then why didn't he dare to look at it? He was afraid that he was the one who killed his sister, so he couldn't accept it! Then he just kept escaping and blaming all the mistakes on Greenwald. I can continue to escape with peace of mind. Is this Gryffindor? I don't even have the courage to face the truth. The original work was too twisted and had too many contradictions after JK wrote it, so after watching the fourth part, I couldn't stand it at all. Because I was angry when I wrote it, I didn't check it, so there should be many typos. Come on!

How about assigning Blaise to Severus? I love you so much Deha~~