[DN] The Game

Wow, a great article. Although they were not together, the heroine returned to her own world in the end, which is quite nice.

I would like to be called the best DNBG fan

Wow, this one is as old as me

Ending with flowers, dear L, it's good to be alive

Since there is a possibility of a sequel, at least Lin Ling is still alive... The good thing is HE hahaha

Although it was written eight years ago, it is really fascinating, and it makes me have the urge to drag the author out and ask for a female protagonist. I was lucky enough to come across this article while browsing through boredom.

The QAQ nest came after the report on high-functioning antisocial disorder... It was the first time in three years that I read BG Xiang's articles... I had already despaired of BG Xiang's articles, but this article was so attractive that I couldn't help crying when I saw Lin die... The long-lost touch and tears are really gratifying. It was a few years ago that I read Death Note. The memory that had been blurred gradually became clear after reading it this time. I remembered that L again, the dead L that I loved - a cute big child. I remember that the moment I saw L die, I almost collapsed and threw the remote control... From now on, I will never touch anything related to Death Note again. Sometimes liking him is such an unreasonable thing, even if he is just a character in the second dimension... Well, I am a legendary fanboy... But I will not hate other characters because of this. I think that the Yagami Yue depicted in DN is actually a child who has not yet grown up. His ideas are too pure and a little paranoid. In the end, such a person is either smoothed by society or chooses a path of self-destruction... He is just unfortunate enough to encounter the Death Note, which can realize the so-called "dream". In fact, I am just writing this review because your character Lin makes me feel very warm... "Go home", how many protagonists in time-travel novels really want to go home? The reason why I can no longer read BG's articles is probably because of this... Next is a digression: Please forgive me, this guy is a child with extremely poor expressive skills. What he wanted to say, I don't know where he went. OTZ. Anyway, I am a legendary patient with depression. Although I have been insisting on treatment for a while, my state is like a 2B coward. You know, so I haven't been able to cry for a long time. Now I am finally reading the article. I'm so touched that I can cry. I can't be violent, but I'm so happy. I can finally cry and watch BG. I can also read BG's good stories when I'm in a literary crisis. I can finally read about the feelings between the opposite sex. I just want to jump up and down. My mother must be very happy. I'm still a good child. No, I want to cry more and more. What the hell am I talking about? Okay, finally, I wish Birdie a smooth filling of the hole and never get stuck. I'll urge you to report on the high-functioning sociopath next door. Come on~

I don't think kindness and justice are synonymous - nor do cruelty and evil. I think neither Yue nor L can be called kind. I can only say that both of them are very rational and can be the kind of people who will risk their lives for the path they believe in. However, it would be too decisive and hasty to say that there are only justice and evil in the world. I think besides that, there are some people who are walking on the edge of black and white, that is the gray area. Absolute justice does not exist! What exists is the moral bottom line in everyone's heart. If you can ask yourself - you can care for your conscience, feel no guilt towards them, and have no regrets after your death, maybe you can call it a kind person, right? If the opposite of justice is evil, then are those who tolerate criminals' reflection and give them a chance to reform considered equally evil? Logically speaking, yes. But if the proposition itself is false, then of course the inference is also false. The overly cruel reality may shatter our young dreams, but everyone - especially those of you who are not mentally and physically mature children like me (anyone who is underage is considered a child anyway, a child is a child, and I am just an inconspicuous member of this huge team) - after watching the cruel hands full of blood and killing to protect the world. Duan, can we not be "being" grown up so quickly, can we not be as "realistic" as they are, the murderer Renheng killed him, but using violence to fight violence is not the best choice, even if it sounds stupid and scary, naive and scary, but please don't be made cynical by such a skinny world, and feel that you want to catch all the evil people. For example, if your parents killed someone accidentally or had a reason to do so (this is just a hypothesis), then as children we should resent them and say without mercy that you deserve to die, that you are evil, and that you are guilty? Do we have the right to sanction them because we are righteous? ! When Yue wrote the pen, did he think that these prisoners had relatives? Did he think that when he deprived them of their lives to prove his justice, did he also deprive those people of the right to love and to give love to others? Why do the current laws largely change the death penalty to life imprisonment or a sentence with a certain buffer time (similar to Qiu Hou Wen Zhan? Laughter XD) instead of direct execution? Would it be of any benefit to the country to raise a group of criminals who committed numerous murders and committed serious crimes to make a living? It's not that I hope that the criminals can repent and that the country can give them a little humane forgiveness - a period of time where they can self-reflect, recognize their mistakes, and even meet their families (this is what I think... Actually I don't know why I keep them, but if my family is arrested for any reason and it is a serious crime If it works, I'd rather they live, even in prison. I hope they live and we bear the pain together. This is a bit of selfishness as a child. Anyway, when I think about it from this perspective, I feel that Fa·lu is really very humane at times. Maybe this is Fa·lu's growth? ——On top of the law, there is social morality. Law and morality are complementary to each other. When trampling on the law and law, people are also trampling on morality and the bottom line of being a human being. This is exactly why I don't agree with Yue. He uses his own ideas to define a person's life and death. What he gives to criminals are all cruel and fatal sentences - the result of the sentence is destined death, bloody and cold, without any emotion. Maybe he has never sympathized with them, but I sympathize with them. I believe that most criminals in the world do not commit suicide because their brains are burned out and they want to die, but out of helplessness, such as not having enough to eat, not wearing warm clothes, social unfairness, this person hurt my self-esteem and trampled on me, etc... I believe that there are relatively few criminals who do it for various reasons, and are truly cold-blooded and lunatic criminals who are not worthy of sympathy at all - because I believe - poor people must be hateful, and vice versa - hateful people must be pitiable - I would find it incredible if a person who has a happy life and a bright future and is satisfied with his life would want to commit a crime... And Yuejun is exactly this kind of person. Overall, everyone around Yuejun loves him very much, whether it is family, classmates or anything else. I think that if I had that kind of life, I would never do the same thing as him. I even think that DN should not exist unless it can be handed over to someone who can represent the absolute fairness of the law. Don't tell me that Yue is such a person. He killed criminals, but he also killed innocent people. He also killed policemen, and he used others to kill others! Criminals are also human beings, so killing is killing. As Feimun said, "A sword is a murder weapon. No matter how beautiful the language is to cover it up, it is always the fact. As for Miss Axun, only those whose hands have never been stained can say... This idea is too naive... But if you compare it with the facts... I still prefer Miss Axun's naive idea..." The unwillingness to admit his murderous behavior is just naivety or self-deception. This motive is ridiculous - killing in the interest of justice. But in fact, it was not his idea alone. Everyone should know Hong Qigong. He righteously told Qiu Qianren, the leader of the Iron Palm Gang, that his men had killed 231 people, and everyone was punished for their crimes. He had never killed anyone by mistake in his life. Because this is what a "xia" should do and it is correct, so he asks himself, he has nothing to be ashamed of and can speak out boldly. Although Hong Qigong's kind of justice is not what I like, when I prefer such a frank and heroic character, at least he has never killed innocent people, and he does things aboveboard. Although this kind of "justice" is not the kind of justice in my heart, it does not make people feel particularly disgusted. At least I think there is a difference between his and Yue's kind of "justice". The "justice" created by wiping out the voices of opponents is too fragile. People just don't dare to resist and hide the dark side in their hearts. Hiding does not mean that there is none. The result of suppression will only brew a more terrifying outbreak. Then - even if he is right - then when he dies, a super-evil force rebound may cause tragedy all over the world. Killers cannot last long. Qin Shihuang is a talented and broad-minded person. His success lies in Shang Yang's reforms that led to the rise of Qin. His failure lies in the harsh laws that led to people's uprising. Are those who rebelled evil? Or is Qin Shihuang, who wanted to use cruel laws to create a peaceful country and people's peace, evil? Does he want to tear his country into pieces? ——Of course not. His ideas and ideals may be right, but he just adopted the wrong method, so he got a devastating blow and inevitable failure. So his empire disintegrated and fell into pieces, but some descendants praised him and some hated him, but would anyone say he was righteous? When those people who had made great achievements in unifying China through his reforms - who had food and clothing because of his series of reforms, and the descendants of those people who decided to revolt after being persecuted, did they feel a little grateful to him in their hearts? So violence cannot solve the problem. Is the world constructed by K really that beautiful? Look at the scene where people went crazy when N dropped the dollars, look at the people who screamed "If you dare to offend me, I will write your names on the Internet, and let K punish you! (To the effect)", look at the other K's who blindly killed people for the sake of the moon. These people may not have committed any crime yet, or they may have been just ordinary people, but their greed People whose greedy nature and stupid behavior indicate that they will do something unforgivable for themselves at any time-perhaps as soon as K ceases to exist-they are one of K's supporters-blind, crazy, self-centered, cruel (even they don't feel that what they are doing is very cruel). Even the self-proclaimed righteous Yue acquiesced in their killing of innocent people. If this is justice, then don't forget this kind of justice! Happiness is something you strive for, and misfortune is something you get. Yue's success and Yue's failure are all his own fault. Whether he succeeds or fails, people still don't know how they will judge him after hundreds of years of success. Will they be grateful? Will they be grateful... Is it interesting? Is it interesting to thank a murderer for creating the so-called utopia for them for decades? Just like I would not be grateful to Qin Shihuang for unifying China, nor would I be grateful to Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty for defeating the Huns. Although I would be proud of this and feel extremely proud, this kind of thing is too far away, hundreds or thousands of years, and there is not enough sense of substitution. Everything about him comes from others, and I don't know the real them. ——I just hope that the people around me are happy and safe, and that the country can become strong as soon as possible. This is my wish. The people are enough, who is the king and the one who is not enough? If the people are not enough, who will be enough for you? We and the motherland have actually been one for a long time - when the motherland is strong, we can live better, and when we live better, the motherland will be stronger. So when I say that I hope the motherland will be strong, it is actually out of my selfish desire to live a better life, but I don't think there is anything shameful about it. And I know that talking about defeating sin is really childish, just as ridiculous as telling someone you should never do a bad thing in your life and never tell any lies. Where there are people, there are not only rivers and lakes, but where there are people there are also disputes - it is only a child's dream to hope that no evil will be done, but when a child dreams, he should not think about the means of killing. The charm of a child lies in his innocence. An innocent person never has a butcher's knife in his hand, and he will not kill people. His weapon is his sincerity, being sincere to others and infecting others, just like an ignorant but serious child standing in front of you and saying a very ridiculous thing to you, "Hey, can we be friends?" "Does it hurt? Let me help you!" I think such a sentence, even if it seems extremely stupid and ridiculous, but in the face of such an innocent childlike face, as long as this criminal still has a little bit of humanity, he will be touched, right? This is the unique power of those precious children. However, the world in a child's life is only about justice and evil, and the two are absolutely opposite - gray things are sometimes difficult to break down for them, maybe because they can't bear it. There is a compromise between justice and evil. Whether such people as completely righteous and completely evil really exist, I don't know. But I hope not, no matter which one it is, it will be very scary--covering evil is evil--not being righteous is evil--the clear-cut camp reminds me of a certain movie version of Digimon (it seems to be the fourth movie version in which the descendants of Firedramon and the descendants of ArmorGarurumon are opposed, anyway, it has a similar feeling) Such rules are extremely cruel. As for L, it cannot represent justice, but what he does can at least be said to have a clear conscience... I can't say that he has more advantages than Yue, because Yue does have many advantages - especially Bai Yue (it can be said that if he is not Kira, but a very capable policeman, in this capacity to capture criminals and punish criminals, I will be more I like him a little more, and agree with him a little more. I like him because he is very smart, very talented, and has many advantages that are worthy of learning - but I also hate his indiscriminate killing of innocent people, playing with emotions, using parents, destroying conscience, and doing whatever it takes to win...) But I can only say that in this aspect - in terms of personal principles - he is better than Yue. It doesn't matter whether they win or lose; I never judge a hero based on his success or failure. I don't think L is a hero. I just think he is of the same kind. It's just that his ideas are a little different from mine. However, he has done so much more than me that I want to study liberal arts instead of science. But I really don't want to do more things that hurt my brain... Orz As for Yue... Forget it, the argument is too big. In short, although I also like him, I don't agree with him. Ah, I seem to have gone off topic again. I'm really sorry. In fact, it's because I just finished reading the author's book yesterday, and I just finished reading dn the day before yesterday and read it immediately - and then I forgot to add points, so I came here to make up for it... If I offend you in my words, please forgive me—— I think if you really like him, it's okay to say something from your heart. To like him is not to regard everything he does as right, but to protect the things about him that are worthy of being liked, to fully understand him, even if it is not comprehensive, and not to say anything to justify his sins. Because I like his strengths, I try my best to tolerate his shortcomings—tolerance, not fanatical forgiveness and neglect—if I could really bring back the three views of these brats! ! ! ! )

Not bad! I didn't realize this was written more than ten years ago.

Thank you to the author for writing this article