Two Words (Crossover)

It's very well written, why hasn't it been updated yet? Are you still updating? Is it not difficult to give me an answer?

What about the author? Where are you? Your readers are calling you!

It took me an hour to read all the chapters, and I found that the author's writing style is very good. The first part is very vivid, and expresses the protagonist's mood vividly, which is very good. But in the second half, the author's focus seems not to be on the plot development of the novel, but on the protagonist's language. In the second half of the novel, the author uses a lot of gorgeous rhetoric, seemingly to highlight the protagonist. But remember, the accumulation and use of idioms and allusions is good, but excessive use will only make people feel redundant. The protagonist uses two or three idioms in a sentence that is no longer than one line. This does not make people think that the speaker is very literary, but rather boring. What readers want to read is the plot of the novel, and what they want to understand is the mood of the characters in the novel. They don't want to read something profound and boring after work, and they don't want to read the truths that everyone obviously knows. Writing online articles is about embodying things that don't often happen in ordinary life in novels, so that readers who want them to happen but are powerless will be hooked after reading them. Magic can appear in online articles, revenge can appear, all kinds of handsome guys and beauties can appear, and there can be anything you can imagine or imagine. But if you want to write a novel that is popular with everyone, then the author must figure out the psychology of readers. What kind of articles readers like to read and what kind of articles readers don't like are all the authors have to think about. There are so many great principles that even later people felt that this was not a novel, but a textbook on ideological and moral character. In any case, online articles do not need gorgeous rhetoric, vivid descriptions, or writing style, but the only thing that is indispensable is the plot. In short, I am very optimistic about this article, otherwise I would not give you advice. However, the author should be careful not to have too complex character dialogue in the article. As long as the reader can understand and see it thoroughly, there is no need to add too many idioms to modify it. As for what you said about normal people saying so many things, I disagree. Think about it, in life, unless it's a debate, who would have enough to eat and nothing to do but spend time thinking about the idioms used to modify every sentence? And it's okay for a person to be like this, which can appropriately highlight his character. However, the author added these complicated words to everyone's language in the following text, which will inevitably make people feel that the tasks in the text are all the same and have no personal characteristics. Speaking in the same tone often covers the character's original personality. In novels, character development is very important. The villain should have his own unique evil or cruelty, while the positive character is generally the kind of justice or upright who follows through to the end, while the neutral character generally gives people an ambiguous feeling. That's it. I hope the author can make some improvements after reading it. If you don't agree with it, there's nothing I can do about it. Just ignore it if you want. . .

Why? It's a trap...

It's very well written, why hasn't it been updated yet?

Wow, why are you being fooled? I really want to see what happens next.

How can this good article be so bad?

It turned out to be a pit... Burst into tears

E is a trap. . . Such a good article is a trap. . Tear

I just thought it looked pretty good... I found out that it had become a big pit... 5