HP: A Researcher's Guide

One thing I don't agree with is that although Snape had conflicts with the Marauders, most of them were 1v1 between James and Snape. In the original book, Sirius was a malicious onlooker who just wanted to see Snape's misfortune. Lupine was unwilling to take action (also because he was a prefect), and Wormtail only watched and cheered. I think James/Sirius/Snape are similar geniuses. Deer Dog mentioned that they didn't study hard but were still the best batch. James and Lily were the best graduates of that class. They also taught themselves the very dangerous animagus and made the Marauder's Map (there should be other prank props or spells, such as Lupine's spell to deal with Peeves). There are really many geniuses in this generation.

Harry and Ron are really not scumbags. Just because they can't talk to Tom doesn't mean they are scumbags. How could Ron become a prefect if his grades are not good? Their grades are really good. Moreover, there are only ten people in OWLs every year who have ten O's and few people have the status of Lao Deng and Lao Fu. Xiao Ha looks bad because this book is from his perspective. From the first person point of view, everyone is actually a mortal, but my view of Xiao Ha is completely the same as Lao Deng...

According to the original text, Snape is indeed very powerful. He is a master of Occlumency, a master of potions, he is also proficient in black magic, and his fighting ability is not bad. However, I still think that he is more than a little worse than Old Deng and Old Fu. This difference is not only in talent, but also in ambition and social skills. The three of them showed amazing talents and social talents when they were in school. All of them All the professors loved Xiaotang, and the young AD had already corresponded with the current master before he graduated. As for Snape, to be honest, no professor in the book mentioned what he was like when he was in school, including Slughorn, who loved Lily. He obviously had such a talent, but no professor valued him and was even bullied in school. Doesn't this prove that he lacked social skills? And ambition... Snape's whole life seems to be lived for Lily. His paranoia makes him destined to be insulated from ambition. To be honest, Old Dungg wanted to rule the world at the age of 17, and Snape became a Death Eater at 17 years old. In my opinion, Snape can become a master of the world, but it is impossible to have an adgglv-like status... How should I put it, the difference between a chess piece and a player.

If you have a teacher who is eyeing you, your grades will not be very good.

I have never been Dunhei. I don't like or hate him, but I agree that he is a great person. I agree with the person above that it is impossible for Dumbledore to trust Snape from the beginning. To be honest, I don't like Snape very much, but I also recognize his greatness. However, it would be too prejudiced and narrow-minded to criticize Snape because Dumbledore did not trust Snape in the beginning. I think the reason is the same as above. To be honest, apart from readers like us who have a God's perspective, no one would trust him. A person who agrees to follow the hostile forces at the beginning, betrays and joins you because the person you have a crush on is in danger... I just want to know how many people can believe it. Distrust is natural.

They are all Slytherins. Just think about the profit aspect. I think they must know that Voldemort's personal charm must be great.

In the original book, Harry was clearly compared to Harry Riddle and Snape, both of whom were poor people who were persecuted by Muggles.

In fact, this is normal. If someone from your hostile force joins you because he has a crush on a woman, and if the leader believes it immediately, then he should go home and sleep. Many people don't understand politics and what it takes to be a leader. Responsibility cannot be easily assumed. When facing the devil, you can only deal with it in the devil's way. Dumbledore is a good man, but he is definitely far from a saint. On the one hand, it is his position and on the other hand, it is his original character. People who criticize him are really naive and hope that they read more history, and so are those who think he is a saint. We are all mortal and contradictory. Dumbledore is someone I admire for his talent, hard work, the way he faced mistakes, and the fight against darkness, what he did as a leader, and so on. His strengths and weaknesses coexist. I admire his good side, but I don't shy away from his bad side. It's really meaningless to separate people. Neutrality and objectivity are the most basic attitudes for evaluating a person. What era he was born in and where he is must be considered. It's really pity the way many people look at people. They don't see what's really interesting about people. If you were to make a list of the most underused things in the world, brains and eyes would definitely be on it.

Anyway, it probably means pure blood. Over time, the family will be rich, haha.

So it's a fairy tale. If there really is such a leader, I don't believe that when he conducts black magic experiments, such as slicing souls, he won't try it on others and just perform the surgery on himself.