Superhero Damage Control [Crossover]

This is the only author among so many comprehensive British and American novels that I have read that can perfectly replicate the movie characters. By establishing an original heroine, he has created a complete and logical novel universe. He is simply the Moriarty of the comprehensive British and American novel authors, the king of IQ and logic.

Well, as a reader who loves trivia, I haven't finished reading this article. Just out of curiosity, I read the entire article to the end. I very much agree. The article is also a kind of three views promoted by the author. A kind of three views does not mean that you have special abilities and privileges, nor is it a set of three views that you can get by paying for it. But after seeing this extra, I have to say that I strongly disagree. Well, maybe the author himself has thought of this and is very clearly aware of this. What I want to say is that no matter what superheroes like Iron Man and Captain America have done, it doesn't matter whether their impact on the future or on that society is good or bad. But you can't deny that they are a group of good people, or that their intentions are good. You can say that they have done many things wrong, and there are also many things that are so-called good intentions but bad things. But without them at that time, the earth would have been destroyed so many times. The protagonist Lucy in the article is indeed very powerful. He has done many things that we cannot imagine, but in any case, I do not agree with the existence of the Suicide Squad. In any case, no matter how many things they missed, they did save many people. In fact, many people died for them, or they missed many things. But as far as the end of the matter is concerned, what we are focusing on now is the most basic interest relationship, which is the simplest balance. Their contribution must be greater than their losses. Then they cannot be treated like the guilty. That woman Amanda is a lunatic. He has enough love for the United States, but he does not have enough of the so-called public morality problems we have. Your author said at the end that we cannot be sure whether Hydra is good or evil, but we can at least be sure that what Hydra does is evil. We cannot be sure whether superheroes are good or evil because they have done many wrong things in the name of good. But in most cases they do good things. They don't have the right to decide many things, so they can't help themselves. But because they can't help themselves, they pay a lot, make a lot of mistakes, lose a lot, and make many people hate them. As we said before, people are never satisfied, but why should we let those who are capable pay for us? What did they get, just like Iron Man in the article, he has so many things, why should he devote himself to saving others, he is conceited and proud. He is a playboy, but he is also a genius. He gives far more than what he gets. In other words, according to the thinking of ordinary people and the selfishness of ordinary people, he should get far more than what he has now, but he didn't do that, so why? Because why should their efforts be wiped out because of their kindness and not perfect in doing good things, let alone handing them over to a madman? Do they really have the right to do that? Maybe, but why are they suicidal? They are willing to sacrifice everything for national security, including their names, but only if they are willing. We can order soldiers to sacrifice everything for national security, including their lives, dignity and even souls, but they are not soldiers. Everything they do is because they are willing. Just like us, we have the ability to do charity, we have the ability to donate, and we have the ability to help many people who can help, but we do all this because we are willing, not because I have this responsibility or this obligation. People who have no obligation to protect, and to do so, they obey the orders of a madman and pay everything for it. I said before that whether Hydra is good or evil is just a stereotype in our minds, but in most cases, Hydra behaves evil. You can talk about human evolution or human autonomy and other issues. But my final conclusion is that superheroes are not their responsibility, but only their own willingness. Just like if one day Iron Man is unwilling to save people, Spider-Man is unwilling to save people, or even Captain America is unwilling to save people, will they not be them? No, they are still themselves, they are just not the superheroes they thought they were, but Captain America actually has less power because his powers originally came from the United States. But in fact, after 90 years of dust, is he really obligated to give everything for the United States? I don't think so. Some of the three views in the whole article are agreed, some are not, but this episode really stimulated me a little. I mean kindness, not an obligation, not a responsibility, she is just because they are willing, just because this person or this group of people are a group of responsible people who are willing to give to others. They are willing to dedicate and are willing to dedicate, but this perseverance, their dedication is taken for granted, and even used as a tool. So why not turn everyone into tools? When the will is no longer the focus of people's behavior, when the will cannot make the decision, if this group of people are not in the army, then their existence is no longer equal to existence. Living is equal to death. They might as well pile tools together, but they are human beings, why should they be other people's tools? Did humans evolve? Everything human beings originate from desire. Because we want to live better, because we want to live, we start planting and hunting, so we start building houses, and start researching on food, clothing, housing and transportation. All of these are desires. When will or desire is not the direction of human behavior, but only the direction of the collective, or their existence is to protect the collective and become a shield or spear for the collective, then their existence is meaningless, because it is meaningless to protect those behind. People say that only by controlling desires can we gain more freedom, but there are no suitable desires or the right amount of desires. The so-called people are just a bunch of walking zombies, so is it their right to turn these people into walking zombies? Are they willing? Even if they are willing, how is this different from the one who trains the last party in the sadomasochism we watch? Maybe the difference is that these people are so-called voluntary, and those people are not voluntary? I insist that this is not the view of right and wrong that should exist.

I have a bad feeling, Steve, are you going to find the female junior of your former lover again?

What about Deadpool? ! The deadpool in this article is the most authentic QAQ I have ever seen, and it always feels like Wonder Woman and Batman are in a political marriage...

(The ending chapter is locked) I took Zhuo

Granddaughter(?_?), Steve you...

Wow... Life is infinite... But isn't there still Thanos in this world... Loki said The one on the heroine's head is still a hidden danger... And in a world without superheroes in the future, which former superhero friends will be left? It should be possible for Superman... As long as he stays in the sun Thor... He still has thousands of years to live Diana... She also has unlimited life after all... Who else?

DaDa's article is really very good-looking (??ω??)??, I have read a lot of fanfics, but DaDa's article is very close to their own characters, and the plot is also very compact and reasonable. Many of my views are the same as DaDa's. The reasons why Marvel heroes have problems are related to their methods of dealing with them. I look forward to other articles from DaDa!

I finished reading this great novel in one sitting, and I have a few extra chapters left to read sparingly. This novel can be said to be the most serious and addictive book I have read in the past year or two. The development of the plot and the use of various professionalisms are quite exciting. Lucy is an ordinary person, but also a great person trained by time and destiny. Such a strong heroine who has grown up little by little is really the cutest girl in my heart. Sometimes, like us, she has a God's perspective and has a preliminary understanding of everything, but she has never looked down upon the world she lives in as a false two-dimensional world. It feels like I can enter this world through her taking on the role. In short, this story is the most satisfying comprehensive British and American novel I have read in the past year! Thank you to the author for creating such a wonderful story for us. I am completely lost in your writing.

This article really surprised me. I like Zongyingmei because I was really moved by the characters in movies or comics at that time. However, fans rarely describe the essential aspects of these characters. Most of them are only one-sided or OOC. But when I read my wife's article, I felt like I was seeing another parallel universe Rose. I really like my wife's article. Does anyone have an answer? I've tried it many times but it never works right ORZ I really want to see my wife's other ideas, please beg me In September, you are the only one in my heart. I really want to be with you. I give you one!