The General’s Life of Leisure [Ancient to Modern]

The following are all my personal opinions, just laugh at them. I watched it at 5:30 in the morning and finally finished it all night long. How should I put it, in fact, apart from the cheating Mary Sue and the relatively poor writing style, as well as the cliché plot of thunder and lightning at the end, this novel still has a lot to like. I'm not being rude, I'm serious. First of all, the characters are well created. What impressed me most was not Fanfan and Little Peacock, but the cold and extreme Jiang Hanting and the cowardly and naive Lin Qingchuan. To be honest, most people don't like these two images, but the character image is the same as the artist. The controversial image is the real success. In fact, I didn't like Jiang Hanting at the beginning. He was selfish and narrow-minded, like a poisonous snake who secretly told his secrets. As for Lin Qingchuan, I thought he was the male protagonist and liked him at first, but as I went on, I felt more and more that he was just a coward with low self-esteem and cowardice. However, as I watched them, I gradually changed my view of these two characters: the former is very real, because life is not a romance novel. His image is unscrupulous but graceful, cold-blooded and cold-hearted yet deeply affectionate (I don't think he is unwilling to get what he wants from Fanfan, On the contrary, I think he really fell in love with Fanfan), and he is very rational, because in real life love is not everything in life, which is why he attracts me - this character is too real and realistic, and is somewhat out of place in this article of Mary Sue. As for Lin Qingchuan, I thought he was the male protagonist at first, so I automatically and consciously looked at him through the colored glasses of the golden-fingered male protagonist. Even if I later found out that the male protagonist was a little peacock, it was a pity. But things got more and more wrong later on. When he was deliberately guiding public opinion, it was still understandable. It wasn't until he committed suicide after being provoked by Jiang Hanting for a few words. I discovered that this character was not the temperamental god of the Mary Sue novel, but a coward who used a glorious appearance to disguise his cowardice and inferiority. He never thought about what his suicide would bring to the heroine, which was what he kept saying he liked; he was not even as good as Jiang Hanting's unscrupulous fight for her, he only knew how to hide in his own world and sink. But precisely because of this, precisely because of my feelings towards the two of them, I found that these two characters were so successfully created. Let's talk about the plot. In fact, I personally think that the most ingenious idea in the whole story is not the connection between Xia Fan's past and present lives, nor the bloody misunderstanding and escape later on, but Jiang Yufan's script. To be honest, judging from the things the author shows us, this film is a very thought-provoking work that reflects reality. If he can really be made into a big-budget movie, maybe he will actually win a big award. Going back to the full text, except for the nonsense at the end, the plot structure at the front is also very good. Then let's talk about the shortcomings. The first is the writing style that has been criticized by many readers. The detail is not appropriate, the places that should be omitted are omitted, and the places that should be detailed are omitted. Coupled with the frequent changes of scenes, the whole text is not smooth to read. I don't know if the author is lazy or something. There are several big scenes that should focus on pen and ink, so the author of Blue Goose skipped it and directly described the ending... The second thing I want to focus on is the bloody thunder at the back. First of all, I want to apologize to the author. Many people don't like the subsequent plot because they initially read this article as a sweet article, so when Xiaosao couldn't accept it at the beginning, they abandoned it. But in fact, this is what the author did well - she respected the natural development of the character's will. In fact, there was something wrong with the way Fanfan and Peacock got along at the beginning. They didn't communicate much, because Fanfan was a conservative from the ancients, so like Peacock, I could hardly feel her love for him, and I agreed to be a couple out of nowhere. Coupled with the fact that Fanfan can't let go of Dafeng, has not fully integrated into modern society, and cares about her family, the ending she chooses to make peace is destined to be separated from Mr. Peacock and then return to Dafeng. From then on, the two of them are separated and forget each other in the world. As an author, you must not destroy the character in order to forcefully reverse the ending. That will lead to the collapse of the character and even the entire text. But the author is still her biological mother after all, so she chose to set up some external factors to prevent the two from being separated, so there were several years in France and Xuyun's bracelet, and even the connection between Fanfan and Peacock's past and present lives. But why do I still think this is a shortcoming? Because I think the setting of this external force is not clever, and it is quite bloody. There is a novel that is originally unique, fresh and refined, but in the end it cannot avoid the disappointment of falling into a bloody TV series. Whether Peacock thought he slept with Ling Weiwei or Fanfan had his own child in France, it was truly a prime eight o'clock plot. Besides, the image of the peacock I saw at first was not so coy and self-pitying. Overall, I still give this article a positive score. Although the heroine's gold finger was a bit too harsh and she almost turned into a Mary Sue... But the reverse wear was generally done well. I hope to continue to work hard in the future. If the author I mentioned above thinks it makes sense, just refer to it. If not, just ignore it. Thank you for your hard work. I'm going to bed, good night~

It's a very interesting article. The Summer Demon King lives so freely, he is a winner among winners in life! However, the text is a bit jumpy, and there are too many typos and omissions...

I just wanted to say, what about the ancient extras? Thought it was a problem with my phone?_??

I've finished reading it. Two years have passed, and I have probably forgotten all about the extra episode.

:-(, Finished reading...

Damn, have you forgotten your ancient extras?

Hahahahahahahaha I've finished reading~ Let's study~

Baby, what's the extra story you promised?

Looking forward to the follow-up episode😊

As for the ancient extra story that was promised, was the author Jun's face really not swollen?